A comprehensive approach for evaluating lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer: Leveraging multimodal MRI findings, radiomics, and deep learning analysis of intra- and peritumoral regions

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102415
Wen Liu , Li Li , Jiao Deng , Wei Li
{"title":"A comprehensive approach for evaluating lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer: Leveraging multimodal MRI findings, radiomics, and deep learning analysis of intra- and peritumoral regions","authors":"Wen Liu ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Jiao Deng ,&nbsp;Wei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast cancer by comparing the diagnostic performance of preoperative multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics and deep-learning (DL) models.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 262 patients with breast cancer—183 in the training cohort (144 LVI-negative and 39 LVI-positive cases) and 79 in the validation cohort (59 LVI-negative and 20 LVI-positive cases). Radiomics features were extracted from the intra- and peritumoral breast regions using multimodal MRI to generate gross tumor volume (GTV)_radiomics and gross tumor volume plus peritumoral volume (GPTV)_radiomics. Subsequently, DL models (GTV_DL and GPTV_DL) were constructed based on the GTV and GPTV to determine the LVI status. Finally, the most effective radiomics and DL models were integrated with imaging findings to establish a hybrid model, which was converted into a nomogram to quantify the LVI risk.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic efficiency of GPTV_DL was superior to that of GTV_DL (areas under the curve [AUCs], 0.771 and 0.720, respectively). Similarly, GPTV_radiomics outperformed GTV_radiomics (AUC, 0.685 and 0.636, respectively). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed an association between imaging findings, such as MRI-axillary lymph nodes and peritumoral edema (AUC, 0.665). The hybrid model achieved the highest accuracy by combining GPTV_DL, GPTV_radiomics, and imaging findings (AUC, 0.872).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The diagnostic efficiency of the GPTV-derived radiomics and DL models surpassed that of the GTV-derived models. Furthermore, the hybrid model, which incorporated GPTV_DL, GPTV_radiomics, and imaging findings, demonstrated the effective determination of LVI status prior to surgery in patients with breast cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50631,"journal":{"name":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102415"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611124000922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast cancer by comparing the diagnostic performance of preoperative multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics and deep-learning (DL) models.

Methods

This retrospective study included 262 patients with breast cancer—183 in the training cohort (144 LVI-negative and 39 LVI-positive cases) and 79 in the validation cohort (59 LVI-negative and 20 LVI-positive cases). Radiomics features were extracted from the intra- and peritumoral breast regions using multimodal MRI to generate gross tumor volume (GTV)_radiomics and gross tumor volume plus peritumoral volume (GPTV)_radiomics. Subsequently, DL models (GTV_DL and GPTV_DL) were constructed based on the GTV and GPTV to determine the LVI status. Finally, the most effective radiomics and DL models were integrated with imaging findings to establish a hybrid model, which was converted into a nomogram to quantify the LVI risk.

Results

The diagnostic efficiency of GPTV_DL was superior to that of GTV_DL (areas under the curve [AUCs], 0.771 and 0.720, respectively). Similarly, GPTV_radiomics outperformed GTV_radiomics (AUC, 0.685 and 0.636, respectively). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed an association between imaging findings, such as MRI-axillary lymph nodes and peritumoral edema (AUC, 0.665). The hybrid model achieved the highest accuracy by combining GPTV_DL, GPTV_radiomics, and imaging findings (AUC, 0.872).

Conclusion

The diagnostic efficiency of the GPTV-derived radiomics and DL models surpassed that of the GTV-derived models. Furthermore, the hybrid model, which incorporated GPTV_DL, GPTV_radiomics, and imaging findings, demonstrated the effective determination of LVI status prior to surgery in patients with breast cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估浸润性乳腺癌淋巴管侵犯的综合方法:利用多模态磁共振成像结果、放射组学和深度学习分析瘤内和瘤周区域
目的通过比较基于术前多模态磁共振成像(MRI)的放射组学模型和深度学习(DL)模型的诊断性能,评估乳腺癌的淋巴管侵犯(LVI)。方法这项回顾性研究纳入了262例乳腺癌患者--其中183例为训练队列(144例LVI阴性,39例LVI阳性),79例为验证队列(59例LVI阴性,20例LVI阳性)。利用多模态磁共振成像从乳腺瘤内和瘤周区域提取放射组学特征,生成肿瘤总体积(GTV)_放射组学和肿瘤总体积加瘤周体积(GPTV)_放射组学。随后,根据 GTV 和 GPTV 建立 DL 模型(GTV_DL 和 GPTV_DL),以确定 LVI 状态。结果 GPTV_DL 的诊断效率优于 GTV_DL(曲线下面积 [AUC],分别为 0.771 和 0.720)。同样,GPTV_放射组学也优于 GTV_放射组学(AUC 分别为 0.685 和 0.636)。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析显示,MRI-腋窝淋巴结和瘤周水肿等成像结果之间存在关联(AUC,0.665)。结论 GPTV 导出的放射组学模型和 DL 模型的诊断效率超过了 GTV 导出的模型。此外,融合了 GPTV_DL、GPTV_放射组学和成像结果的混合模型证明了在乳腺癌患者手术前确定 LVI 状态的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
3.50%
发文量
71
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics is to act as a source for the exchange of research results concerning algorithmic advances, development, and application of digital imaging in disease detection, diagnosis, intervention, prevention, precision medicine, and population health. Included in the journal will be articles on novel computerized imaging or visualization techniques, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, augmented reality for surgical planning and guidance, big biomedical data visualization, computer-aided diagnosis, computerized-robotic surgery, image-guided therapy, imaging scanning and reconstruction, mobile and tele-imaging, radiomics, and imaging integration and modeling with other information relevant to digital health. The types of biomedical imaging include: magnetic resonance, computed tomography, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, X-ray, microwave, optical and multi-photon microscopy, video and sensory imaging, and the convergence of biomedical images with other non-imaging datasets.
期刊最新文献
Exploring transformer reliability in clinically significant prostate cancer segmentation: A comprehensive in-depth investigation. DSIFNet: Implicit feature network for nasal cavity and vestibule segmentation from 3D head CT AFSegNet: few-shot 3D ankle-foot bone segmentation via hierarchical feature distillation and multi-scale attention and fusion VLFATRollout: Fully transformer-based classifier for retinal OCT volumes WISE: Efficient WSI selection for active learning in histopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1