Mitigating policies for pollutant emissions in a DSGE for the Brazilian economy

IF 1.3 Latin American Journal of Central Banking Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.latcb.2024.100145
Marcos Valli Jorge, Angelo M Fasolo, Silvio Michael de Azevedo Costa
{"title":"Mitigating policies for pollutant emissions in a DSGE for the Brazilian economy","authors":"Marcos Valli Jorge,&nbsp;Angelo M Fasolo,&nbsp;Silvio Michael de Azevedo Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.latcb.2024.100145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the dynamic behavior of the Brazilian economy under policy regimes aimed at controlling pollutant emissions and limiting environmental damage. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are assumed to be of two types: carbon from fossil resources burning for energy generation (i.e., thermoelectric) or carbon and non-carbon outputs from production processes (i.e., methane from cattle). Firms optimally decide on the demand for fossil and green energy, as the level of effort dedicated to abating emissions coming from production processes. Two alternative policies for emissions, which include emissions taxation (fixed cost) and emission permits trade (quantity caps), are introduced into an open-economy DSGE model for the Brazilian economy. Departing from the estimated parameters of the original version of the model, ratios in the new block of equations for the energy and emissions are calibrated using sectoral data, and some elasticities are set to reproduce the sensibility to some shocks implicit in the NGFS<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> scenarios (Net Zero 2050). Simulations indicate neither of the emissions policies can induce transition in the energy matrix without a green investment policy. The approach adopted here is a first step in building a macroeconomic model capable of challenging scenarios from more specialized models dedicated to energy and emissions by better assessing possible effects and feedback related to the iterations with macroeconomic dynamics. Despite the difficulties concerning the limited availability of data in higher frequency, results indicate those modeling approaches are sufficiently flexible to incorporate the main aspects of energy and emission, serving as valuable tools for policy analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100867,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143824000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamic behavior of the Brazilian economy under policy regimes aimed at controlling pollutant emissions and limiting environmental damage. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are assumed to be of two types: carbon from fossil resources burning for energy generation (i.e., thermoelectric) or carbon and non-carbon outputs from production processes (i.e., methane from cattle). Firms optimally decide on the demand for fossil and green energy, as the level of effort dedicated to abating emissions coming from production processes. Two alternative policies for emissions, which include emissions taxation (fixed cost) and emission permits trade (quantity caps), are introduced into an open-economy DSGE model for the Brazilian economy. Departing from the estimated parameters of the original version of the model, ratios in the new block of equations for the energy and emissions are calibrated using sectoral data, and some elasticities are set to reproduce the sensibility to some shocks implicit in the NGFS1 scenarios (Net Zero 2050). Simulations indicate neither of the emissions policies can induce transition in the energy matrix without a green investment policy. The approach adopted here is a first step in building a macroeconomic model capable of challenging scenarios from more specialized models dedicated to energy and emissions by better assessing possible effects and feedback related to the iterations with macroeconomic dynamics. Despite the difficulties concerning the limited availability of data in higher frequency, results indicate those modeling approaches are sufficiently flexible to incorporate the main aspects of energy and emission, serving as valuable tools for policy analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西经济 DSGE 中的污染物排放缓解政策
本文考察了旨在控制污染物排放和限制环境破坏的政策制度下巴西经济的动态行为。温室气体(GHG)排放被认为有两种类型:为发电而燃烧化石资源产生的碳(即热电)或生产过程产生的碳和非碳输出(即牛产生的甲烷)。企业最优地决定对化石能源和绿色能源的需求,作为致力于减少生产过程中排放的努力水平。两种可供选择的排放政策,包括排放税(固定成本)和排放许可交易(数量上限),被引入到巴西经济的开放经济DSGE模型中。与模型原始版本的估计参数不同,使用部门数据校准了能源和排放新方程中的比率,并设置了一些弹性,以再现NGFS1情景(2050年净零)中隐含的对某些冲击的敏感性。模拟结果表明,如果没有绿色投资政策,这两种排放政策都无法诱导能源矩阵的转变。本文采用的方法是构建宏观经济模型的第一步,通过更好地评估与宏观经济动态迭代相关的可能影响和反馈,该模型能够挑战来自更专门的能源和排放模型的情景。尽管高频率数据的可得性有限存在困难,但结果表明,这些建模方法足够灵活,可以纳入能源和排放的主要方面,作为政策分析的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Policy Uncertainty in Central America and the Dominican Republic The hierarchy of critical participants: A clustering approach utilising network-based indicators for payment systems Beyond carry-trading: New insights into the uses of foreign-denominated bond issuances by Latin American firms The finances of Chilean households during the pandemic: an assessment from the 2021 Household Financial Survey Comparison of inflation expectations from surveys and markets across different horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1