Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of sustainable development goals and their interactions and linkages in the Eurasian continent

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.007
Qian Liu , Fujia Li , Suocheng Dong , Hao Cheng , Longwu Liang , Bing Xia
{"title":"Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of sustainable development goals and their interactions and linkages in the Eurasian continent","authors":"Qian Liu ,&nbsp;Fujia Li ,&nbsp;Suocheng Dong ,&nbsp;Hao Cheng ,&nbsp;Longwu Liang ,&nbsp;Bing Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comprehending the complex interactions and linkages among Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is fundamental to prioritizing and advancing progress. However, studies on the regional-scale SDGs and their interactions and linkages are limited. Here, an aggregated approach would allow for progress, trade-offs, synergies, modularity, and prioritization to reveal the relationship between different SDGs. And then, homogeneity and heterogeneity were considered from a comparative regional perspective, that means we used homogeneity and heterogeneity to analyze differences between regions. The results highlight that the synergistic effect among the Eurasian SDGs was greater than the trade-offs. The trade-offs were concentrated in SDG12(Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG13(Climate Action). As for linkages, between 2000 and 2010, the modularity of the Eurasian SDGs increased from 0.2095 to 0.2189, indicating a weakening of inter-module linkages and a strengthening of intra-module linkages. However, it tended to stabilize between 2010 and 2020. SDG3 (Good Health and Well-Being), SDG4 (Quality Education), and SDG1 (No Poverty) were the prioritized SDGs. In addition, there were spatial homogeneity and heterogeneity in the progress, interactions, and linkages of the SDGs. Our study highlights spatial homogeneity and heterogeneity to focus on regions with SDGs progress networks and may help to fix prioritization to achieve as many SDGs as possible by 2030.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 151-165"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924001672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehending the complex interactions and linkages among Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is fundamental to prioritizing and advancing progress. However, studies on the regional-scale SDGs and their interactions and linkages are limited. Here, an aggregated approach would allow for progress, trade-offs, synergies, modularity, and prioritization to reveal the relationship between different SDGs. And then, homogeneity and heterogeneity were considered from a comparative regional perspective, that means we used homogeneity and heterogeneity to analyze differences between regions. The results highlight that the synergistic effect among the Eurasian SDGs was greater than the trade-offs. The trade-offs were concentrated in SDG12(Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG13(Climate Action). As for linkages, between 2000 and 2010, the modularity of the Eurasian SDGs increased from 0.2095 to 0.2189, indicating a weakening of inter-module linkages and a strengthening of intra-module linkages. However, it tended to stabilize between 2010 and 2020. SDG3 (Good Health and Well-Being), SDG4 (Quality Education), and SDG1 (No Poverty) were the prioritized SDGs. In addition, there were spatial homogeneity and heterogeneity in the progress, interactions, and linkages of the SDGs. Our study highlights spatial homogeneity and heterogeneity to focus on regions with SDGs progress networks and may help to fix prioritization to achieve as many SDGs as possible by 2030.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧亚大陆可持续发展目标的时空异质性及其相互作用和联系
理解可持续发展目标(SDGs)之间复杂的相互作用和联系对于确定优先次序和推动进展至关重要。然而,对区域范围的可持续发展目标及其相互作用和联系的研究十分有限。在此,采用综合方法可以取得进展、权衡利弊、协同增效、模块化和确定优先次序,从而揭示不同可持续发展目标之间的关系。然后,从地区比较的角度来考虑同质性和异质性,即利用同质性和异质性来分析地区之间的差异。结果表明,欧亚可持续发展目标之间的协同效应大于权衡效应。权衡主要集中在 SDG12(负责任的消费和生产)和 SDG13(气候行动)。在联系方面,2000 年至 2010 年间,欧亚可持续发展目标的模块化程度从 0.2095 增至 0.2189,表明模块间联系减弱,模块内联系加强。然而,在 2010 年至 2020 年期间,该指数趋于稳定。可持续发展目标 3(良好的健康和福祉)、可持续发展目标 4(优质教育)和可持续发展目标 1(消除贫困)是优先考虑的可持续发展目标。此外,在可持续发展目标的进展、互动和联系方面存在空间同质性和异质性。我们的研究强调了空间同质性和异质性,以关注具有可持续发展目标进展网络的地区,并可能有助于确定优先次序,以便在 2030 年之前实现尽可能多的可持续发展目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic and substitutive pathways for sustainable production and consumption in China's passenger vehicle transition: A dynamic multi-life-cycle assessment Dynamic optimization of the implementation of circular economy options for global sustainability Prospective life cycle assessment of typical electrical and electronic equipment Coupled water-energy‑carbon footprints in intensifying agriculture: Mechanisms and spatial dynamics Decoding sustainability: The effect of eco-labels and textual cues on consumers' spontaneous recall and interpretation of environmental claims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1