New Phoenix criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock: the strengths and the future of a comprehensive perspective

Vanessa Soares Lanziotti, Andrea Ventura, S. Kache, Jaime Fernández-Sarmiento
{"title":"New Phoenix criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock: the strengths and the future of a comprehensive perspective","authors":"Vanessa Soares Lanziotti, Andrea Ventura, S. Kache, Jaime Fernández-Sarmiento","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240058-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Greek mythology, the phoenix bird symbolizes life that overcomes death and the strength that accompanies transformation. Therefore, Phoenix is an appropriate name for the new Pediatric Sepsis Score owing to both the mythological reference and the location where it was first presented (Society of Critical Care Medicine – SCCM - Conference in Phoenix, Arizona). (1) The Phoenix Pediatric Sepsis (PPS) criteria for sepsis and septic shock are intended to identify children (1 month to <18 years) with life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection, and the score was developed based on more than three million pediatric electronic health encounters, (2) which is a remarkable achievement considering pediatric and adult sepsis studies. The previous pediatric sepsis criteria were published in 2005 by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC), and sepsis was defined as a suspected or confirmed infection in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (Figure 1). (3) Although these criteria are broadly used in daily practice, limitations to this definition have been identified since its inception. (4) Specific limitations of concern include a lack of consideration of a global context, leading to challenges in the applicabiblity of these criteria in limited-resource settings where the highest sepsis burden lies; variability in application at the bedside, which leads to delay in patient diagnosis; and the inability to","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"92 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240058-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Greek mythology, the phoenix bird symbolizes life that overcomes death and the strength that accompanies transformation. Therefore, Phoenix is an appropriate name for the new Pediatric Sepsis Score owing to both the mythological reference and the location where it was first presented (Society of Critical Care Medicine – SCCM - Conference in Phoenix, Arizona). (1) The Phoenix Pediatric Sepsis (PPS) criteria for sepsis and septic shock are intended to identify children (1 month to <18 years) with life-threatening organ dysfunction due to infection, and the score was developed based on more than three million pediatric electronic health encounters, (2) which is a remarkable achievement considering pediatric and adult sepsis studies. The previous pediatric sepsis criteria were published in 2005 by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC), and sepsis was defined as a suspected or confirmed infection in the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (Figure 1). (3) Although these criteria are broadly used in daily practice, limitations to this definition have been identified since its inception. (4) Specific limitations of concern include a lack of consideration of a global context, leading to challenges in the applicabiblity of these criteria in limited-resource settings where the highest sepsis burden lies; variability in application at the bedside, which leads to delay in patient diagnosis; and the inability to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凤凰城小儿败血症和脓毒性休克新标准:全面视角的优势与未来
在希腊神话中,凤凰鸟象征着战胜死亡的生命和伴随转变的力量。因此,凤凰城是新的儿科脓毒症评分标准的恰当名称,这既与神话有关,也与该评分标准首次发布的地点有关(美国亚利桑那州凤凰城召开的重症医学会(Society of Critical Care Medicine - SCCM))。(1)凤凰城儿科败血症(PPS)败血症和脓毒性休克标准旨在识别因感染导致器官功能障碍而危及生命的儿童(1 个月至小于 18 岁),该评分是基于 300 多万次儿科电子健康会诊制定的,(2)考虑到儿科和成人败血症研究,这是一项了不起的成就。之前的儿科败血症标准由国际儿科败血症共识会议(IPSCC)于 2005 年发布,败血症被定义为存在全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的疑似或确诊感染(图 1)。(3)尽管这些标准在日常实践中得到了广泛应用,但自该定义提出以来,已发现了其局限性。(4)值得关注的具体局限性包括:缺乏对全球背景的考虑,导致这些标准在资源有限的环境中的适用性面临挑战,而这些环境正是败血症负担最重的地方;床旁应用的可变性,导致患者诊断的延迟;以及无法在全球范围内使用这些标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1