Controversia en el uso y en la financiación de SYSADOA para la osteoartritis en España: un análisis del debate científico-social en los medios de comunicación

IF 1.3 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Reumatologia Clinica Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.reuma.2024.05.002
Pedro Alfonso Domínguez Vera , Luis Carrasco Páez
{"title":"Controversia en el uso y en la financiación de SYSADOA para la osteoartritis en España: un análisis del debate científico-social en los medios de comunicación","authors":"Pedro Alfonso Domínguez Vera ,&nbsp;Luis Carrasco Páez","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>The use of SYmptomatic Slow-Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) has been a topic of debate in the scientific community and public entities regarding their public financing in Spain. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze the main positions of media outlets, public entities, regarding the use and financing of SYSADOA in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the content regarding the use and financing of SYSADOA was conducted in general media outlets (<em>El País</em>, <em>El Mundo, La Vanguardia, ABC,</em> and <em>20minutos</em>), public statements, and Twitter® publications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 15 articles in general media outlets, 872 tweets, and 7 public entity statements were identified. Mostly, media outlets (91%) and social media platforms (78%) exhibited a favorable trend towards funding.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><div>The use of SYSADOA in OA patients continues to be controversial in the scientific community. However, there is consensus among patient associations in favor of public funding and use as a treatment for OA patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":"20 8","pages":"Pages 416-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X24000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

The use of SYmptomatic Slow-Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) has been a topic of debate in the scientific community and public entities regarding their public financing in Spain. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze the main positions of media outlets, public entities, regarding the use and financing of SYSADOA in Spain.

Methods

A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the content regarding the use and financing of SYSADOA was conducted in general media outlets (El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia, ABC, and 20minutos), public statements, and Twitter® publications.

Results

A total of 15 articles in general media outlets, 872 tweets, and 7 public entity statements were identified. Mostly, media outlets (91%) and social media platforms (78%) exhibited a favorable trend towards funding.

Discussion and conclusions

The use of SYSADOA in OA patients continues to be controversial in the scientific community. However, there is consensus among patient associations in favor of public funding and use as a treatment for OA patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙骨关节炎使用和资助 SYSADOA 的争议:媒体社会科学辩论分析
背景和目的在西班牙,骨关节炎慢作用药物 SYSADOA(SYmptomatic Slow-Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis)在治疗骨关节炎(OA)方面的应用一直是科学界和公共实体就其公共融资问题争论不休的话题。本研究旨在描述和分析媒体、公共实体对西班牙使用和资助 SYSADOA 的主要立场。研究方法对一般媒体(El País、El Mundo、La Vanguardia、ABC 和 20minutos)、公共声明和 Twitter® 出版物中有关 SYSADOA 使用和资助的内容进行了定性和定量分析。结果共发现 15 篇一般媒体文章、872 条微博和 7 份公共实体声明。大多数媒体(91%)和社交媒体平台(78%)对资助表现出了积极的趋势。讨论与结论在 OA 患者中使用 SYSADOA 在科学界仍存在争议。然而,患者协会已达成共识,赞成公共资助并将其用作治疗 OA 患者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Clinical validation of video DASH for upper limb disorders in rheumatic patients Causas de retiro del tratamiento biológico en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas: estudio de cohorte observacional del sureste de México Factors associated with the perception of body image in patients with psoriatic disease Coexistence of systemic lupus erythematosus and sarcoidosis: A case-based review Anti-Mi-2-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis unveiled by a V-sign
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1