{"title":"Faire is the Heaven: Action and Utopia in Simone de Beauvoir’s Pyrrhus et Cinéas","authors":"Thomas Chesworth","doi":"10.3366/nfs.2024.0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that Simone de Beauvoir’s early essay Pyrrhus et Cinéas (1944) can be read as an articulation of a critically utopian ethics. It suggests that the ontology of action developed in Pyrrhus et Cinéas is an early case of Beauvoir’s critical engagement with Hegel and, in particular, the Kojèvian reading popular among her existentialist contemporaries. Unlike Kojève, whose Marxist reading of Hegel suggested that he was theorising a teleological model of History, Beauvoir develops a critique of utopian models of History wherein freedom is an ultimate finality, arguing instead that freedom is to be found in action, and thus must be persistently renewed. This article closes by suggesting that the existential ethics Beauvoir develops from this model of freedom implies an account of utopia which is critical of orthodox socialist philosophies of history.","PeriodicalId":19182,"journal":{"name":"Nottingham French Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nottingham French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2024.0409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article argues that Simone de Beauvoir’s early essay Pyrrhus et Cinéas (1944) can be read as an articulation of a critically utopian ethics. It suggests that the ontology of action developed in Pyrrhus et Cinéas is an early case of Beauvoir’s critical engagement with Hegel and, in particular, the Kojèvian reading popular among her existentialist contemporaries. Unlike Kojève, whose Marxist reading of Hegel suggested that he was theorising a teleological model of History, Beauvoir develops a critique of utopian models of History wherein freedom is an ultimate finality, arguing instead that freedom is to be found in action, and thus must be persistently renewed. This article closes by suggesting that the existential ethics Beauvoir develops from this model of freedom implies an account of utopia which is critical of orthodox socialist philosophies of history.
本文认为,西蒙娜-德-波伏娃(Simone de Beauvoir)的早期散文《Pyrrhus et Cinéas》(1944 年)可被解读为一种批判乌托邦伦理学的阐述。文章认为,《Pyrrhus et Cinéas》中提出的行动本体论是波伏娃批判黑格尔的早期案例,尤其是波伏娃同时代存在主义者中流行的科耶夫式解读。科耶夫对黑格尔进行了马克思主义的解读,认为黑格尔在理论上提出了一种目的论的历史模式,而波伏娃则不同,她对乌托邦式的历史模式进行了批判,认为自由是一种终极的终结,相反,自由可以在行动中找到,因此必须持续不断地更新。本文最后指出,波伏娃从这一自由模式中发展出的存在主义伦理学意味着对乌托邦的一种解释,而这种解释是对正统社会主义历史哲学的批判。
期刊介绍:
Nottingham French Studies is an externally-refereed academic journal which, from Volume 43, 2004, appears three times annually, with at least one special and one general issue each year. Its Editorial Board is drawn from members of the Department of French and Francophone Studies of the University of Nottingham, with the support of an International Advisory Board.