814 If You Want to Go Far, Go Together: Student Perception of Joint Medical and Surgical Education Programmes

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae163.173
N. Kerdegari, D. Sunder Bala Sundaram, R. Kirby, G. Leng
{"title":"814 If You Want to Go Far, Go Together: Student Perception of Joint Medical and Surgical Education Programmes","authors":"N. Kerdegari, D. Sunder Bala Sundaram, R. Kirby, G. Leng","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae163.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Medical students have varied specialty interests which acts as a barrier to undergraduate engagement at specialty-specific conferences. The Tomorrow's Doctors 2023 conference, hosted at The Royal Society of Medicine, aimed to improve students’ understanding of current innovations across multiple medical and surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to determine student perception of a combined medical and surgical conference.\n \n \n \n The two-day conference consisted of 8 talks and 8 workshops. Feedback was collected following each day using online questionnaires. Each questionnaire was specific to the agenda of that day. Quantitative and qualitative feedback was collected on students’ perception of combined medical and surgical conferences for undergraduate students. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis.\n \n \n \n There were 90 delegates on day one and 85 delegates on day two from 16 medical schools. Post-conference feedback was completed by 45 (50.0%) and 42 (49.4%) attendees for days one and two respectively. 82.2% of day one and 88.1% of day two respondents agreed that joint medical and surgical conferences were beneficial for medical students. Thematic analysis of post-conference free-text responses revealed the commonest themes for favouring joint medical and surgical conferences were ability to explore both medical and surgical interests (52.5%), supports career progression (27.5%) and practical application of knowledge gained (17.5%).\n \n \n \n Our feedback demonstrates that joint medical and surgical conferences are perceived as beneficial by current medical students. Future undergraduate conferences should adopt a combined approach to allow students to explore their varied interests and subsequently facilitate informed specialty selection.\n","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae163.173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical students have varied specialty interests which acts as a barrier to undergraduate engagement at specialty-specific conferences. The Tomorrow's Doctors 2023 conference, hosted at The Royal Society of Medicine, aimed to improve students’ understanding of current innovations across multiple medical and surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to determine student perception of a combined medical and surgical conference. The two-day conference consisted of 8 talks and 8 workshops. Feedback was collected following each day using online questionnaires. Each questionnaire was specific to the agenda of that day. Quantitative and qualitative feedback was collected on students’ perception of combined medical and surgical conferences for undergraduate students. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis. There were 90 delegates on day one and 85 delegates on day two from 16 medical schools. Post-conference feedback was completed by 45 (50.0%) and 42 (49.4%) attendees for days one and two respectively. 82.2% of day one and 88.1% of day two respondents agreed that joint medical and surgical conferences were beneficial for medical students. Thematic analysis of post-conference free-text responses revealed the commonest themes for favouring joint medical and surgical conferences were ability to explore both medical and surgical interests (52.5%), supports career progression (27.5%) and practical application of knowledge gained (17.5%). Our feedback demonstrates that joint medical and surgical conferences are perceived as beneficial by current medical students. Future undergraduate conferences should adopt a combined approach to allow students to explore their varied interests and subsequently facilitate informed specialty selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
814 如果你想走得更远,就一起走:学生对联合医学和外科教育计划的看法
医科学生的专业兴趣各不相同,这阻碍了本科生参与专业会议。由英国皇家医学会主办的 "明日医生 2023 "会议旨在提高学生对多个内外科专业当前创新的了解。本研究旨在确定学生对内外科联合会议的看法。 为期两天的会议包括 8 个讲座和 8 个研讨会。每天会议结束后都会通过在线问卷收集反馈意见。每份问卷都针对当天的议程。就学生对本科生内外科联合会议的看法收集了定量和定性反馈。对自由文本回复进行了主题分析。 来自 16 所医学院的 90 名代表参加了第一天的会议,85 名代表参加了第二天的会议。第一天和第二天分别有 45 名(50.0%)和 42 名(49.4%)参会者填写了会后反馈。82.2%的第一天和88.1%的第二天受访者都认为内外科联合会议对医学生有益。对会后自由文本回复的主题分析表明,赞成联合医学和外科会议的最常见主题是能够探索医学和外科兴趣(52.5%)、支持职业发展(27.5%)和实际应用所学知识(17.5%)。 我们的反馈表明,在校医学生认为内外科联合会议是有益的。未来的本科生会议应采用联合的方式,让学生探索自己的不同兴趣,进而促进明智的专业选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
413
期刊介绍: ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics: Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture
期刊最新文献
Bifunctional Analgesic-Pro-Healing Hydrogel Dressing for Postoperative Analgesia and Wound Healing in Mice. Correction to "Human-Derived Scaffold Components and Stem Cells Creating Immunocompatible Dermal Tissue Ensuing Regulated Nonfibrotic Cellular Phenotypes". Thermo-Transitioning Core-Shell Microgels Combine Cohesive Reinforcement and Noncohesive Reconfigurability to Enable 3D Bioprinting and Stabilize Tissues During Incubation. Molecular Weight-Driven Tunable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels Modulate Immune Polarization in Three-Dimensional Microenvironments. A Rat Model of Lateral Ankle Sprain Induced by Manual Manipulation, with Controlled Force and Angle: An Experimental Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1