British Journal of Surgery最新文献

Background: Postoperative complications after colorectal cancer surgery have been linked to the gut microbiome. However, the impact of mechanical bowel preparation using oral preparation agents or rectal enema on postoperative infections remains poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the impact of oral preparation and rectal enema on the gut microbiome and postoperative complications.

Methods: This open-label pilot RCT was conducted at the National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania. Patients with left-side colorectal cancer scheduled for elective resection with primary anastomosis were randomized 1 : 1 to preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with either oral preparation or rectal enema. Stool samples were collected before surgery, and on postoperative day 6 and 30 for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. The primary outcome was difference in β-diversity between groups on postoperative day 6.

Results: Forty participants were randomized to oral preparation (20) or rectal enema (20). The two groups had similar changes in microbiome composition, and there was no difference in β-diversity on postoperative day 6. Postoperative infections occurred in 12 patients (32%), without differences between the study groups. Patients with infections had an increased abundance of bacteria from the Actinomycetaceae family, Actinomyces genus, Sutterella uncultured species, and Enterococcus faecalis species.

Conclusion: Mechanical bowel preparation with oral preparation or rectal enema resulted in similar dysbiosis. Patients who experienced postoperative infections exhibited distinct gut microbiome compositions on postoperative day 6, characterized by an increased abundance of bacteria from the Actinomycetaceae family, Actinomyces genus, Sutterella uncultured species, and Enterococcus faecalis species.

Registration number: NCT04013841 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Background: With the increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, the availability of different treatment options remains essential. Studies comparing the outcomes of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists with those of metabolic bariatric surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity are lacking.

Methods: Using propensity score matching, based on data from several nationwide clinical registries, patients who underwent primary metabolic bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) were matched with patients who received glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Outcome measures included the occurrence of major cardiovascular events, microvascular complications, and potential side effects (alcohol/substance abuse, self-harm, and fractures).

Results: Over a mean follow-up of 7 years, major cardiovascular events occurred in 191 of 2039 patients (cumulative incidence 14.5%) in the surgery group compared with 247 of 2039 patients (19.6%) in the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist group (HR 0.75 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 0.91), P = 0.003). Patients in the surgery group had lower haemoglobin A1c values 5 years after treatment (mean difference 9.82 (95% c.i. 8.51 to 11.14) mmol/mol, P < 0.001) and fewer microvascular complications (retinopathy HR 0.88 (95% c.i. 0.79 to 0.99), P = 0.039; nephropathy HR 0.72 (95% c.i. 0.66 to 0.80), P < 0.001; and neuropathy or leg ulcers HR 0.82 (95% c.i. 0.74 to 0.92), P < 0.001), but a higher risk of alcohol/substance abuse (HR 2.56 (95% c.i. 1.87 to 3.50), P < 0.001), self-harm (HR 1.41 (95% c.i. 1.17 to 1.71), P < 0.001), and fractures (HR 1.86 (95% c.i. 1.11 to 3.12), P = 0.019).

Conclusion: Compared with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist treatment, metabolic bariatric surgery is associated with superior metabolic outcomes and a lower risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity, but a higher risk of alcohol/substance abuse, self-harm, and fractures.

Background: Resection of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PanNETs) is curative in most patients. The potential benefits of neoadjuvant treatments have, however, never been explored. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of neoadjuvant 177Lu-labelled DOTA0-octreotate (177Lu-DOTATATE) followed by surgery in patients with NF-PanNETs.

Methods: NEOLUPANET was a multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with sporadic, resectable or potentially resectable NF-PanNETs at high-risk of recurrence; those with positive 68Ga-labelled DOTA PET were eligible. All patients were candidates for neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE followed by surgery. A sample size of 30 patients was calculated to test postoperative complication rates against predefined cut-offs. The primary endpoint was safety, reflected by postoperative morbidity and mortality within 90 days. Secondary endpoints included rate of objective radiological response and quality of life.

Results: From March 2020 to February 2023, 31 patients were enrolled, of whom 26 completed 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. A partial radiological response was observed in 18 of 31 patients, and 13 patients had stable disease. Disease progression was not observed. Twenty-four R0 resections and 4 R1 resections were performed in 29 patients who underwent surgery. One tumour was unresectable owing to vascular involvement. There was no postoperative death. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 of 29 patients. Severe complications were observed in seven patients. Quality of life remained stable after 177Lu-DOTATATE and decreased after surgery.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE is safe and effective for patients with NF-PanNETs.

Background: Several ablation confirmation software methods for minimum ablative margin assessment have recently been developed to improve local outcomes for patients undergoing thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Previous assessments were limited to single institutions mostly at the place of development. The aim of this study was to validate the previously identified 5 mm minimum ablative margin (A0) using autosegmentation and biomechanical deformable image registration in a multi-institutional setting.

Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective study including patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing CT- or ultrasound-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation during 2009-2022, reporting 3-year local disease progression (residual unablated tumour or local tumour progression) rates by minimum ablative margin across all institutions and identifying an intraprocedural contrast-enhanced CT-based minimum ablative margin associated with a 3-year local disease progression rate of less than 1%.

Results: A total of 400 ablated colorectal liver metastases (median diameter of 1.5 cm) in 243 patients (145 men; median age of 62 [interquartile range 54-70] years) were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 26 (interquartile range 17-40) months. A total of 119 (48.9%) patients with 186 (46.5%) colorectal liver metastases were from international institutions B, C, and D that were not involved in the software development. Three-year local disease progression rates for 0 mm, >0 and <5 mm, and 5 mm or larger minimum ablative margins were 79%, 15%, and 0% respectively for institution A (where the software was developed) and 34%, 19%, and 2% respectively for institutions B, C, and D combined. Local disease progression risk decreased to less than 1% with an intraprocedurally confirmed minimum ablative margin greater than 4.6 mm.

Conclusion: A minimum ablative margin of 5 mm or larger demonstrates optimal local oncological outcomes. It is proposed that an intraprocedural minimum ablative margin of 5 mm or larger, confirmed using biomechanical deformable image registration, serves as the A0 for colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation.