Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy followed by mastectomy and breast reconstruction—A systematic review of clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes

{"title":"Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy followed by mastectomy and breast reconstruction—A systematic review of clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pre-operative radiotherapy (PRT) and pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) prior to mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer have the potential to reduce radiation late-effects and expedite oncologic treatment. Recent feasibility work indicates that PCRT is safe and technically possible. Here, we present a systematic review of currently available data on clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospectively registered search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), EMCARE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases was performed in August 2023. Clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes were appraised with risk of bias (ROBINS-I) and methodological quality determined (STROBE checklist) for each study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-two published articles (19 journal articles and 3 abstracts) were identified reporting the outcomes of 1258 patients with median follow-up between 19.0–212.4 months. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 20 studies. Rates of locoregional recurrence and overall survival ranged between 0–21.7% and 82.0%−98.3% respectively. Rates of flap loss or necrosis ranged from 0–7.6%. Rates of revisional procedures ranged between 1.9–35.3%. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 7 studies and were mostly ‘good’ or ‘excellent’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PRT and PCRT preceding mastectomy and breast reconstruction produce acceptable oncological outcomes with rates of surgical complication and reconstructive outcomes within normal limits, however, the majority of available studies are of low methodological quality and at high risk of bias. A pragmatic randomised trial comparing PRT versus PMRT in the setting of breast reconstruction is now urgently required to guide surgical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524003954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pre-operative radiotherapy (PRT) and pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) prior to mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer have the potential to reduce radiation late-effects and expedite oncologic treatment. Recent feasibility work indicates that PCRT is safe and technically possible. Here, we present a systematic review of currently available data on clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes.

Methods

A prospectively registered search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), EMCARE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases was performed in August 2023. Clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes were appraised with risk of bias (ROBINS-I) and methodological quality determined (STROBE checklist) for each study.

Results

Twenty-two published articles (19 journal articles and 3 abstracts) were identified reporting the outcomes of 1258 patients with median follow-up between 19.0–212.4 months. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 20 studies. Rates of locoregional recurrence and overall survival ranged between 0–21.7% and 82.0%−98.3% respectively. Rates of flap loss or necrosis ranged from 0–7.6%. Rates of revisional procedures ranged between 1.9–35.3%. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 7 studies and were mostly ‘good’ or ‘excellent’.

Conclusion

PRT and PCRT preceding mastectomy and breast reconstruction produce acceptable oncological outcomes with rates of surgical complication and reconstructive outcomes within normal limits, however, the majority of available studies are of low methodological quality and at high risk of bias. A pragmatic randomised trial comparing PRT versus PMRT in the setting of breast reconstruction is now urgently required to guide surgical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前化疗放疗后乳房切除和乳房重建--临床、肿瘤学、重建和美学效果的系统回顾
背景局部晚期乳腺癌患者在接受乳房切除术和即刻乳房重建术之前进行术前放疗(PRT)和术前化疗(PCRT)有可能减少放射晚期效应并加快肿瘤治疗。最近的可行性研究表明 PCRT 是安全的,在技术上也是可行的。方法2023年8月,我们对Medline(Ovid)、EMBASE(Ovid)、EMCARE(Ovid)和CINAHL(EBSCO)数据库进行了前瞻性检索。对每项研究的临床、肿瘤、整形和美容结果进行了评估,并确定了偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)和方法学质量(STROBE检查表)。结果共发现22篇已发表的文章(19篇期刊文章和3篇摘要),报告了1258例患者的治疗结果,中位随访时间为19.0-212.4个月。20项研究中的患者接受了新辅助化疗。局部复发率和总生存率分别为0-21.7%和82.0%-98.3%。皮瓣脱落或坏死率为0-7.6%。翻修率介于1.9%-35.3%之间。7项研究报告了患者报告的结果,结果大多为 "良好 "或 "优秀"。结论乳房切除术和乳房重建术前的PRT和PCRT可产生可接受的肿瘤学结果,手术并发症发生率和重建结果均在正常范围内,但大多数现有研究的方法学质量较低,偏倚风险较高。现在急需一项实用的随机试验,对乳房重建中的 PRT 和 PMRT 进行比较,以指导手术实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Trends in advanced practice providers in plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013–2021 Editorial Board Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: A retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study Taps, wicks, bridges and LIFTs: Clarification on the origins of lymphatic flaps The curious case of medical advisor: The house of cards in aesthetic medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1