{"title":"The postulated role of brain pulsations and arachnoid membranes in cerebrospinal fluid circulation, ventriculomegaly and related CSF disorders","authors":"Muhammad Hasan Raza","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Hydrocephalus can be obstructive or communicating. In cases of communicating hydrocephalus, patients will typically have enlarged brain ventricles. It has long been thought that the reason for this is obstruction to the outflow of cerebrospinal fluid from the </span>subarachnoid space, which also results in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, there are several clinical and anatomic observations that are not well explained by this idea. These are for example, the conditions of Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) which has normal ICP but ventriculomegaly, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) which has raised ICP but normal sized ventricles. This hypothesis states that the mechanism for raised ICP and large ventricles seen in communicating hydrocephalus (ventriculomegaly) are different and seeks to explain the cause of ventriculomegaly using illustrative examples. It also suggests explanations for why ventriculomegaly occurs in NPH, infectious or carcinomatous meningitis, but is absent in IIH, or dural venous sinus thrombosis. Based on operative neurosurgical observations it states that the arachnoid membranes in the basal cisterns serve as part of a directional CSF flow mechanism consisting of fluid diodes, or “Tesla valves” of arachnoid membrane, containing CSF that is propelled by brain pulsations from the point of exit from the 4th ventricle to its points of absorption. This hypothesis suggests explanations for the physiologic appearance of a near uniform subarachnoid space, as well as the occurrence of the syndrome of the trephined and external hydrocephalus seen following a decompressive craniectomy. Also suggested are avenues of further research testing with MRI phase contrast CSF flow studies, classification of anatomic and </span><em>peri</em>-operative observations and rationale for creation of novel experiments to test the hypothesis, and aid diagnosis and treatment of a number of cranial CSF disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 111424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724001671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hydrocephalus can be obstructive or communicating. In cases of communicating hydrocephalus, patients will typically have enlarged brain ventricles. It has long been thought that the reason for this is obstruction to the outflow of cerebrospinal fluid from the subarachnoid space, which also results in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, there are several clinical and anatomic observations that are not well explained by this idea. These are for example, the conditions of Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) which has normal ICP but ventriculomegaly, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) which has raised ICP but normal sized ventricles. This hypothesis states that the mechanism for raised ICP and large ventricles seen in communicating hydrocephalus (ventriculomegaly) are different and seeks to explain the cause of ventriculomegaly using illustrative examples. It also suggests explanations for why ventriculomegaly occurs in NPH, infectious or carcinomatous meningitis, but is absent in IIH, or dural venous sinus thrombosis. Based on operative neurosurgical observations it states that the arachnoid membranes in the basal cisterns serve as part of a directional CSF flow mechanism consisting of fluid diodes, or “Tesla valves” of arachnoid membrane, containing CSF that is propelled by brain pulsations from the point of exit from the 4th ventricle to its points of absorption. This hypothesis suggests explanations for the physiologic appearance of a near uniform subarachnoid space, as well as the occurrence of the syndrome of the trephined and external hydrocephalus seen following a decompressive craniectomy. Also suggested are avenues of further research testing with MRI phase contrast CSF flow studies, classification of anatomic and peri-operative observations and rationale for creation of novel experiments to test the hypothesis, and aid diagnosis and treatment of a number of cranial CSF disorders.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.