Comparative analysis of FinTech adoption among Islamic and conventional banking users with moderating effect of education level: A UTAUT2 perspective

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100343
Muhammad Abdullah Idrees , Saif Ullah
{"title":"Comparative analysis of FinTech adoption among Islamic and conventional banking users with moderating effect of education level: A UTAUT2 perspective","authors":"Muhammad Abdullah Idrees ,&nbsp;Saif Ullah","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to examine the consumer behavior with regards to the FinTech services in the context of Pakistan and identify the consumers’ driver and detractors to adopt FinTech firm. Tapping into an area yet un-explored, it seeks to propose a conceptual framework based on the UTAUT2 model and extend the FinTech adoption model by determining the effect of performance expectancy and effort expectancy based on educational segmentation. In a similar vein, it aims at examining the gaps in the adoption of FinTech services in both Islamic banking as well as the conventional competing banks of Pakistan. This paper employed a quantitative research design; data were collected from 382 subjects in Karachi, Pakistan Convenience sampling and random number generation were employed to minimize biased. This study sought participants’ responses to the survey questionnaire of 22 items, distinguishing the seven constructs of the UTAUT2 and a new one, education level, on a five-point Likert scale. Concerning the sample size and the research methods that were used, the rationale was given in line with the available guidelines and the results of empirical research in the field of behavioral sciences. As the research hypothesis postulated, the study revealed performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions as independent factors influencing behavioral intention to use FinTech, although the moderating effect of education level only affected the relationship between the performance expectancy and behavioral intention to use FinTech influenced by it. They also found differences between Islamic and conventional banking users, and the enhancing/attenuating impacts of the constructs on the behavioral intention alertly. This research underscores the essential factors that influence the behavioral intention of the users towards FinTech services – performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions – with implications for promoting positive service experiences. Financial technology firms must heed these insights to create simple and secure applications to increase the adoption of FinTech innovations that are sensitive to the anglophone African cultures. Besides, the focus on deploying rather diverse local initiatives for comprehending and constantly improving the FinTech services based on people’s feedback can increase consumers’ trust and expectations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124001379/pdfft?md5=fe3bb968563b8eb5889dddcc8bce06c0&pid=1-s2.0-S2199853124001379-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124001379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the consumer behavior with regards to the FinTech services in the context of Pakistan and identify the consumers’ driver and detractors to adopt FinTech firm. Tapping into an area yet un-explored, it seeks to propose a conceptual framework based on the UTAUT2 model and extend the FinTech adoption model by determining the effect of performance expectancy and effort expectancy based on educational segmentation. In a similar vein, it aims at examining the gaps in the adoption of FinTech services in both Islamic banking as well as the conventional competing banks of Pakistan. This paper employed a quantitative research design; data were collected from 382 subjects in Karachi, Pakistan Convenience sampling and random number generation were employed to minimize biased. This study sought participants’ responses to the survey questionnaire of 22 items, distinguishing the seven constructs of the UTAUT2 and a new one, education level, on a five-point Likert scale. Concerning the sample size and the research methods that were used, the rationale was given in line with the available guidelines and the results of empirical research in the field of behavioral sciences. As the research hypothesis postulated, the study revealed performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions as independent factors influencing behavioral intention to use FinTech, although the moderating effect of education level only affected the relationship between the performance expectancy and behavioral intention to use FinTech influenced by it. They also found differences between Islamic and conventional banking users, and the enhancing/attenuating impacts of the constructs on the behavioral intention alertly. This research underscores the essential factors that influence the behavioral intention of the users towards FinTech services – performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions – with implications for promoting positive service experiences. Financial technology firms must heed these insights to create simple and secure applications to increase the adoption of FinTech innovations that are sensitive to the anglophone African cultures. Besides, the focus on deploying rather diverse local initiatives for comprehending and constantly improving the FinTech services based on people’s feedback can increase consumers’ trust and expectations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰银行用户和传统银行用户采用金融科技的比较分析与教育水平的调节效应:UTAUT2视角
本研究旨在考察巴基斯坦消费者对金融科技服务的行为,并确定消费者采用金融科技公司的驱动因素和阻碍因素。在一个尚未探索的领域,本研究试图提出一个基于UTAUT2 模型的概念框架,并通过确定基于教育细分的绩效预期和努力预期的影响来扩展金融科技采纳模型。同样,本文旨在研究巴基斯坦伊斯兰银行和传统竞争银行在采用金融科技服务方面存在的差距。本文采用了定量研究设计;从巴基斯坦卡拉奇的 382 名受试者中收集数据 采用了方便抽样和随机数生成的方法,以尽量减少偏差。本研究通过 22 个项目的调查问卷,以五点李克特量表区分了UTAUT2 的七个构念和一个新的构念--教育水平,并寻求受试者的回答。关于所使用的样本量和研究方法,根据现有的指导原则和行为科学领域的实证研究结果给出了合理的解释。正如研究假设所推测的那样,研究揭示了绩效预期、努力预期、社会影响和便利条件是影响使用金融科技行为意向的独立因素,但教育水平的调节作用仅影响绩效预期与受其影响的使用金融科技行为意向之间的关系。他们还发现了伊斯兰银行用户和传统银行用户之间的差异,以及构建因素对行为意向警觉性的增强/减弱影响。这项研究强调了影响用户对金融科技服务行为意向的基本因素--绩效预期、努力预期、社会影响和便利条件--对促进积极的服务体验具有重要意义。金融科技公司必须重视这些见解,创建简单安全的应用程序,以提高对非洲英语国家文化敏感的金融科技创新的采用率。此外,重点部署相当多样化的本地举措,以理解并根据人们的反馈不断改进金融科技服务,可以提高消费者的信任度和期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
期刊最新文献
The synergy between human factors, public digitalization and public administration in the European context Substitution of workforce with robotics in the construction industry: A wise or witless approach Predicting the intention to install solar photovoltaic panels in emerging market: The role of consumer innovativeness, knowledge, and support for government incentives Logistics business management of provider in Thailand with smart logistics Open innovation between university-industry: A review of research trends and practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1