Exploring pet rat care: A comprehensive survey of husbandry, health, behavior, and the associations between caretaker attitudes, attachment, and husbandry practices

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jveb.2024.06.009
Stephanie Schneidewind , Raffaela Lesch , Veronika Heizmann , Ines Windschnurer
{"title":"Exploring pet rat care: A comprehensive survey of husbandry, health, behavior, and the associations between caretaker attitudes, attachment, and husbandry practices","authors":"Stephanie Schneidewind ,&nbsp;Raffaela Lesch ,&nbsp;Veronika Heizmann ,&nbsp;Ines Windschnurer","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pet rats are still understudied in terms of animal welfare and human-animal interaction research. An extensive online survey targeting German-speaking rat caretakers was conducted (n = 978). One of the study's goals was to investigate husbandry practices, health indicators, rat behaviors that suggest either good or compromised welfare, as well as elements of the human-animal relationship, including interactions between humans and animals, caretaker attitudes, and attachment. The second aim was to explore the associations between caretaker attitudes and attachment, and caretaker behavior, encompassing routine health checks, interactions between humans and animals, as well as the activities and enrichment provided to rats. In some instances, welfare issues were identified: insufficient space (evident in 10.6% of rats), provision of unhealthy snacks (14.6%). The vast majority of rats enjoyed a variety of enrichment objects, e.g., huts/houses (98.4%), nesting material (92.7%), hammocks (91.7%), and tunnels/tubes (83.7%). The average amount of space and time provided for roaming in case of no permanent roaming possibility (13.9 m<sup>2</sup> and 2.5 h per day) was positive in terms of welfare. About 79.0% of rats did not suffer from a disease diagnosed by a veterinarian. Repetitive behaviors, which may represent stereotypies, were uncommon (plucking out own fur and cage bar chewing occurred “never” in 99.1% and 81.5%). Indicators of good welfare (e.g., self-grooming, rearing, eye-boggling) were observed several times/day in 89.6%, 46.7%, and 11.6% respectively. Caretakers who formed strong bonds with their rats tended to express positive general attitudes (such as finding rats ‘‘lovable’’ and ‘‘fun’’), while showing little agreement with statements reflecting negative attitudes (like considering rats ‘‘dirty’’). About 84.4% reported stroking their rat, 94.9% reported talking to it, and 70.9% mentioned hand-feeding their rat several times per day. Caretaker attitudes and attachment and human-animal interactions and caretaker behaviors correlated weakly but consistently (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01): respondents who felt more comfortable during positive interactions, stroked, hand-fed their rats, offered rat-friendly enrichment and performed health checks more often. In contrast, higher agreement to rats being ‘‘dirty’’ related to less frequent health checks and less frequent positive human-animal interactions. The identified relationships between caretaker attitudes and behaviors can help design interventions to promote caretaker behavior that is beneficial for rat welfare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"75 ","pages":"Pages 1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787824000510/pdfft?md5=e3480043395837dfee7ee992606846d6&pid=1-s2.0-S1558787824000510-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787824000510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pet rats are still understudied in terms of animal welfare and human-animal interaction research. An extensive online survey targeting German-speaking rat caretakers was conducted (n = 978). One of the study's goals was to investigate husbandry practices, health indicators, rat behaviors that suggest either good or compromised welfare, as well as elements of the human-animal relationship, including interactions between humans and animals, caretaker attitudes, and attachment. The second aim was to explore the associations between caretaker attitudes and attachment, and caretaker behavior, encompassing routine health checks, interactions between humans and animals, as well as the activities and enrichment provided to rats. In some instances, welfare issues were identified: insufficient space (evident in 10.6% of rats), provision of unhealthy snacks (14.6%). The vast majority of rats enjoyed a variety of enrichment objects, e.g., huts/houses (98.4%), nesting material (92.7%), hammocks (91.7%), and tunnels/tubes (83.7%). The average amount of space and time provided for roaming in case of no permanent roaming possibility (13.9 m2 and 2.5 h per day) was positive in terms of welfare. About 79.0% of rats did not suffer from a disease diagnosed by a veterinarian. Repetitive behaviors, which may represent stereotypies, were uncommon (plucking out own fur and cage bar chewing occurred “never” in 99.1% and 81.5%). Indicators of good welfare (e.g., self-grooming, rearing, eye-boggling) were observed several times/day in 89.6%, 46.7%, and 11.6% respectively. Caretakers who formed strong bonds with their rats tended to express positive general attitudes (such as finding rats ‘‘lovable’’ and ‘‘fun’’), while showing little agreement with statements reflecting negative attitudes (like considering rats ‘‘dirty’’). About 84.4% reported stroking their rat, 94.9% reported talking to it, and 70.9% mentioned hand-feeding their rat several times per day. Caretaker attitudes and attachment and human-animal interactions and caretaker behaviors correlated weakly but consistently (P < 0.01): respondents who felt more comfortable during positive interactions, stroked, hand-fed their rats, offered rat-friendly enrichment and performed health checks more often. In contrast, higher agreement to rats being ‘‘dirty’’ related to less frequent health checks and less frequent positive human-animal interactions. The identified relationships between caretaker attitudes and behaviors can help design interventions to promote caretaker behavior that is beneficial for rat welfare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宠物鼠护理探究:关于饲养、健康、行为以及饲养者态度、依恋和饲养方法之间关系的全面调查
在动物福利和人与动物互动研究方面,对宠物鼠的研究仍然不足。我们针对讲德语的大鼠饲养者进行了一次广泛的在线调查(n = 978)。研究的目标之一是调查饲养方法、健康指标、表明大鼠福利良好或受损的行为,以及人与动物关系的要素,包括人与动物之间的互动、饲养者的态度和依恋关系。第二个目的是探索看护人的态度和依恋关系与看护人行为之间的关联,包括日常健康检查、人与动物之间的互动以及为大鼠提供的活动和丰富内容。在某些情况下,还发现了一些福利问题:空间不足(10.6% 的老鼠明显存在)、提供不健康的零食(14.6%)。绝大多数老鼠喜欢各种丰富的物品,如小屋/房屋(98.4%)、筑巢材料(92.7%)、吊床(91.7%)和隧道/管道(83.7%)。在没有永久漫游可能的情况下,提供的平均漫游空间和时间(13.9 平方米和每天 2.5 小时)对大鼠的福利具有积极意义。约 79.0% 的老鼠没有患过兽医诊断的疾病。可能代表刻板印象的重复行为并不常见(99.1% 和 81.5%的老鼠 "从不 "拔自己的毛和啃咬笼栏)。每天多次观察到良好福利指标(如自我梳理毛发、饲养、瞪眼)的比例分别为 89.6%、46.7% 和 11.6%。与老鼠建立了深厚感情的饲养者倾向于表达积极的一般态度(如认为老鼠 "可爱 "和 "有趣"),而对反映消极态度的陈述(如认为老鼠 "肮脏")则很少表示同意。约 84.4% 的人说他们抚摸过老鼠,94.9% 的人说他们和老鼠说过话,70.9% 的人说他们每天亲手喂过老鼠几次。看护人的态度和依恋与人与动物的互动和看护人的行为之间存在微弱但一致的相关性(P < 0.01):在积极互动中感觉更舒适的受访者更经常地抚摸、亲手喂养他们的大鼠,提供对大鼠友好的富集物和进行健康检查。相反,对老鼠 "脏 "的认同度越高,健康检查的频率就越低,人与动物之间积极互动的频率就越低。所确定的看护者态度和行为之间的关系有助于设计干预措施,促进看护者的行为,从而有利于大鼠的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
期刊最新文献
Survey on the importance of different traits for medical detection dogs Cardiovascular effects of dog-appeasing pheromone in the hospital environment Behavior and reactivity during milking of Holstein, Gyr, and Girolando-F1 cows at the beginning of lactation Inclined treadmill short-duration exercise for walk regularity of recreation horses Pet parenting: A systematic review of its characteristics and effects on companion dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1