Long-term outcomes of patients affected by Guillain-Barré syndrome in Colombia after the Zika virus epidemic

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123140
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of patients affected by Guillain-Barré syndrome in Colombia after the Zika virus epidemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) can lead to significant functional impairments, yet little is understood about the recovery phase and long-term consequences for patients in low- and medium-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the functional status and identify factors influencing outcomes among patients with GBS in Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Telephone interviews were conducted with GBS patients enrolled in the Neuroviruses Emerging in the Americas Study between 2016 and 2020. The investigation encompassed access to health services and functional status assessments, utilizing the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), GBS Disability Score (GDS), Barthel Index (BI), and International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Univariate analysis, principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, and linear regression were employed to explore factors influencing functional status.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-five patients (mean age = 50[±22] years) with a median time from diagnosis of 28 months (IQR = 9–34) were included. Notably, 22% and 16% of patients did not receive rehabilitation services during the acute episode and post-discharge, respectively. Most patients demonstrated independence in basic daily activities (median BI = 100, IQR = 77.5–100), improvement in disability as the median mRS at follow-up was lower than at onset (1 [IQR = 0–3] vs. 4.5 [IQR = 4–5], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and most were able to walk without assistance (median GDS = 2, IQR = 0–2). A shorter period from disease onset to interview was associated with worse mRS (<em>p</em> = 0.015) and ICF (<em>p</em> = 0.019). Negative outcomes on GDS and ICF were linked to low socioeconomic status, ICF to the severity of weakness at onset, and BI to an older age.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study underscores that the functional recovery of GBS patients in Colombia is influenced not only by the natural course of the disease but also by socioeconomic factors, emphasizing the crucial role of social determinants of health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24002752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) can lead to significant functional impairments, yet little is understood about the recovery phase and long-term consequences for patients in low- and medium-income countries.

Objective

To evaluate the functional status and identify factors influencing outcomes among patients with GBS in Colombia.

Methods

Telephone interviews were conducted with GBS patients enrolled in the Neuroviruses Emerging in the Americas Study between 2016 and 2020. The investigation encompassed access to health services and functional status assessments, utilizing the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), GBS Disability Score (GDS), Barthel Index (BI), and International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Univariate analysis, principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, and linear regression were employed to explore factors influencing functional status.

Results

Forty-five patients (mean age = 50[±22] years) with a median time from diagnosis of 28 months (IQR = 9–34) were included. Notably, 22% and 16% of patients did not receive rehabilitation services during the acute episode and post-discharge, respectively. Most patients demonstrated independence in basic daily activities (median BI = 100, IQR = 77.5–100), improvement in disability as the median mRS at follow-up was lower than at onset (1 [IQR = 0–3] vs. 4.5 [IQR = 4–5], p < 0.001), and most were able to walk without assistance (median GDS = 2, IQR = 0–2). A shorter period from disease onset to interview was associated with worse mRS (p = 0.015) and ICF (p = 0.019). Negative outcomes on GDS and ICF were linked to low socioeconomic status, ICF to the severity of weakness at onset, and BI to an older age.

Conclusions

This study underscores that the functional recovery of GBS patients in Colombia is influenced not only by the natural course of the disease but also by socioeconomic factors, emphasizing the crucial role of social determinants of health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚吉兰-巴雷综合征患者在寨卡病毒流行后的长期治疗效果
背景吉兰-巴雷综合征(Guillain-Barré Syndrome,GBS)可导致严重的功能障碍,但人们对中低收入国家患者的康复阶段和长期后果知之甚少。方法在 2016 年至 2020 年期间,对参加美洲新发神经病毒研究的 GBS 患者进行了电话访谈。调查内容包括获得医疗服务的情况和功能状态评估,评估采用改良兰金量表(mRS)、GBS 残疾评分(GDS)、巴特尔指数(BI)和国际功能分类(ICF)。采用单变量分析、主成分分析、线性判别分析和线性回归等方法探讨影响功能状态的因素。值得注意的是,分别有22%和16%的患者在急性期和出院后未接受康复服务。大多数患者在基本日常活动方面表现出独立性(中位数 BI = 100,IQR = 77.5-100),残疾情况有所改善,因为随访时的 mRS 中位数低于发病时(1 [IQR = 0-3] vs. 4.5 [IQR = 4-5],p <0.001),而且大多数患者能够在没有帮助的情况下行走(中位数 GDS = 2,IQR = 0-2)。从发病到接受访谈的时间越短,mRS(p = 0.015)和 ICF(p = 0.019)越差。GDS 和 ICF 的负面结果与社会经济地位低下有关,ICF 与发病时虚弱的严重程度有关,而 BI 则与年龄较大有关。结论这项研究强调,哥伦比亚 GBS 患者的功能恢复不仅受到疾病自然病程的影响,还受到社会经济因素的影响,从而强调了健康的社会决定因素的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Importance of focusing on subjective symptoms to maintain quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease for over 5 years. Bridging transdisciplinary in medical education: A pathway to achieve SDG 3 in Global Health. Response to letter from Catamo, Costa, Buque & Nzwalo (2024) titled "Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome" regarding Spencer, Valdes Angues & Palmer's paper titled "Nodding syndrome: A role for environmental biotoxins that dysregulate MECP2 expression?" JNS. 2024;462:123077. Doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123077. Response to the letter “Acute stroke care inequities: Cross-cultural insights and the need for multi-ethnic research” Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1