From inclusion to indigenisation: Māori methodologies for diversity scholarship

N. Staniland, Diane Ruwhiu, Kiri Dell
{"title":"From inclusion to indigenisation: Māori methodologies for diversity scholarship","authors":"N. Staniland, Diane Ruwhiu, Kiri Dell","doi":"10.1108/edi-09-2022-0248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper argues for the inclusion of Indigenous research methodologies in diversity scholarship to (1) adequately account for and value the identity, lived experiences and concerns of Indigenous Peoples and (2) to enrich diversity theorising and scholarship by proposing new ways to think about and conduct research on difference, inclusion and belonging. We further highlight the roles non-Indigenous researchers can play in supporting Indigenous methodologies.Design/methodology/approachWe introduce EDI readers to Indigenous research methodologies through explicating two Indigenous (Maori) methodologies from Aotearoa New Zealand and demonstrating points of convergence and divergence from existing methodologies evident in diversity scholarship.FindingsThe application of Eurocentric methodologies, including postcolonial approaches, can inaccurately theorise Indigenous experience through a Western lens compounding the ongoing impacts of colonialism. Conversely, drawing primarily from cultural knowledge and traditions, Indigenous methodologies place considerable value on people and place, relationships and relational accountabilities, each underpinned by an explicit intent to produce research with positive transformative potential for participant communities. Using Kaupapa Maori and Mana Wahine research as examples, we highlight how elements of “resistance” aligns with critical theories, but the “difference” inherent in Indigenous methodologies enables a more authentic engagement with people and place that is critical to understanding issues of significance to Indigenous Peoples.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the lack of engagement with Indigenous research methodologies and priorities of Indigenous communities within diversity scholarship. We argue that Indigenous priorities make broader contributions to the diversity agenda by attributing deeper meaning to difference and resistance as enacted through the context specificity of the Indigenous world. We contend Indigenous methodologies illuminate unique perspectives and priorities that can make powerful contributions to broader discussions of equity, inclusion and belonging.","PeriodicalId":503114,"journal":{"name":"Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-09-2022-0248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper argues for the inclusion of Indigenous research methodologies in diversity scholarship to (1) adequately account for and value the identity, lived experiences and concerns of Indigenous Peoples and (2) to enrich diversity theorising and scholarship by proposing new ways to think about and conduct research on difference, inclusion and belonging. We further highlight the roles non-Indigenous researchers can play in supporting Indigenous methodologies.Design/methodology/approachWe introduce EDI readers to Indigenous research methodologies through explicating two Indigenous (Maori) methodologies from Aotearoa New Zealand and demonstrating points of convergence and divergence from existing methodologies evident in diversity scholarship.FindingsThe application of Eurocentric methodologies, including postcolonial approaches, can inaccurately theorise Indigenous experience through a Western lens compounding the ongoing impacts of colonialism. Conversely, drawing primarily from cultural knowledge and traditions, Indigenous methodologies place considerable value on people and place, relationships and relational accountabilities, each underpinned by an explicit intent to produce research with positive transformative potential for participant communities. Using Kaupapa Maori and Mana Wahine research as examples, we highlight how elements of “resistance” aligns with critical theories, but the “difference” inherent in Indigenous methodologies enables a more authentic engagement with people and place that is critical to understanding issues of significance to Indigenous Peoples.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the lack of engagement with Indigenous research methodologies and priorities of Indigenous communities within diversity scholarship. We argue that Indigenous priorities make broader contributions to the diversity agenda by attributing deeper meaning to difference and resistance as enacted through the context specificity of the Indigenous world. We contend Indigenous methodologies illuminate unique perspectives and priorities that can make powerful contributions to broader discussions of equity, inclusion and belonging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从包容到本土化:毛利人的多样性学术研究方法
目的本文主张将土著研究方法纳入多样性学术研究,以便:(1) 充分考虑和重视土著人民的身份、生活经历和关切;(2) 通过提出思考和开展差异、包容和归属研究的新方法,丰富多样性理论和学术研究。我们通过阐释新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的两种土著(毛利人)研究方法,向电子数据交换读者介绍了土著研究方法,并展示了与多样性学术研究中现有方法的汇合点和分歧点。研究结果以欧洲为中心的方法论(包括后殖民主义方法)的应用,可能会通过西方视角对土著经验进行不准确的理论分析,从而加剧殖民主义的持续影响。与此相反,土著方法论主要从文化知识和传统中汲取营养,非常重视人与地方、人与人之间的关系以及人与人之间的责任。我们以考帕帕毛利人(Kaupapa Maori)和马纳瓦欣人(Mana Wahine)的研究为例,强调了 "抵制 "元素如何与批判性理论相吻合,但土著方法论中固有的 "差异 "能够更真实地与人和地方接触,这对于理解对土著人民具有重要意义的问题至关重要。我们认为,土著社区的优先事项可为多样性议程做出更广泛的贡献,因为它们通过土著世界的特定背景,为差异和抵抗赋予了更深刻的意义。我们认为,土著研究方法揭示了独特的视角和优先事项,可以为有关公平、包容和归属的更广泛讨论做出有力贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The only daughters effect: examining the relationship between child gender and a CEO’s hiring decisions “They kill us mentally”: exploring microaggression towards LGBTQIA+ employees in Indian workplaces From mandate to co-create: leading the development of inclusive performance evaluation criteria Leader responses to a pandemic: the interaction of leader gender and country collectivism predicting pandemic deaths Do dominant groups respond negatively to diversity policies? The impact of modern racism beliefs on organizational citizenship behavior intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1