ESG rating uncertainty and institutional investment—evidence from China

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Borsa Istanbul Review Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bir.2024.07.001
Miao Zeng , Xiaoyu Zhu , Xin Deng , Jiang Du
{"title":"ESG rating uncertainty and institutional investment—evidence from China","authors":"Miao Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xin Deng ,&nbsp;Jiang Du","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using panel data on China's A-share listed enterprises from 2015 to 2022, this study applies a fixed effects model of the year, industry, and region to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings and ESG rating uncertainty on institutional investment. The results of this study find that: (1) ESG ratings significantly and positively affect institutional investment, but the existence of ESG rating uncertainty significantly and negatively affects institutional investment. Meanwhile, ESG rating uncertainty weakens the influence of ESG ratings on institutional investment. (2) Institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty of enterprises that are government-related (state-owned and politic connected), executive-right-expanded, loss-making, non-heavy-polluting, non-high-tech, and in the eastern region. Meanwhile, passive institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty. (3) The number of institutional investors, government subsidies, and securities market performance are the channels through which ESG rating uncertainty affects institutional investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 1166-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024001078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using panel data on China's A-share listed enterprises from 2015 to 2022, this study applies a fixed effects model of the year, industry, and region to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings and ESG rating uncertainty on institutional investment. The results of this study find that: (1) ESG ratings significantly and positively affect institutional investment, but the existence of ESG rating uncertainty significantly and negatively affects institutional investment. Meanwhile, ESG rating uncertainty weakens the influence of ESG ratings on institutional investment. (2) Institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty of enterprises that are government-related (state-owned and politic connected), executive-right-expanded, loss-making, non-heavy-polluting, non-high-tech, and in the eastern region. Meanwhile, passive institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty. (3) The number of institutional investors, government subsidies, and securities market performance are the channels through which ESG rating uncertainty affects institutional investment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境、社会和治理评级的不确定性与机构投资--来自中国的证据
本研究采用2015年至2022年中国A股上市企业的面板数据,运用年份、行业和地区的固定效应模型,实证检验了ESG评级和ESG评级不确定性对机构投资的影响。研究结果发现(1)ESG 评级对机构投资有显著的正向影响,但 ESG 评级不确定性的存在对机构投资有显著的负向影响。同时,ESG 评级的不确定性削弱了 ESG 评级对机构投资的影响。(2)机构投资者对政府相关企业(国有企业、政企关联企业)、行政权利扩张型企业、亏损企业、非重污染企业、非高科技企业、东部地区企业的ESG评级不确定性更为敏感。同时,被动型机构投资者对 ESG 评级的不确定性更为敏感。(3)机构投资者数量、政府补贴和证券市场表现是 ESG 评级不确定性影响机构投资的渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
130
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How does green investment respond to ICT and financial development? From global tensions to regional integration: An analysis of bond market convergence in East Asia Do institutional environment and corporate governance structures determine Islamic Banks’ sustainability performance? Evidence across key jurisdictions in Islamic finance industry Do subsidized export credits affect firms’ behavior in the FX market? Micro evidence from Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1