Improving building natural ventilation simulation accuracy: calibration of standard k − ε closure coefficients using design of experiment

Q. Li, V. C. Tai, L. K. Moey, T. F. Go, N. F. A. Rahman
{"title":"Improving building natural ventilation simulation accuracy: calibration of standard k − ε closure coefficients using design of experiment","authors":"Q. Li, V. C. Tai, L. K. Moey, T. F. Go, N. F. A. Rahman","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this study is to improve the accuracy of the standard k − ε (SKE) turbulence model for natural ventilation simulation, a critical component in the analysis and design of energy-efficient buildings. The methodology involves generating 17 design points for the four closure coefficients (C\n \n ɛ\n \n 1,C\n \n ɛ\n \n 2,C\n \n µ\n ,σ\n \n k\n ) for the SKE model using 2k full-factorial design of experiment (DOE) with a centre point. A sheltered single storey-building with windward and leeward openings is modelled and simulated using computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to obtain the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Factor of two observation (FAC2) for each design point. Response models for RMSE and FAC2 are then generated, and optimization is employed to maximize FAC2, minimize RMSE, and the combination of both. The results are validated and compared with experimental and simulation data reported in existing literature. The findings indicate that the indoor velocity profiles with closure coefficients obtained by maximizing FAC2 are better aligned with the actual experimental results. Compared with the existing calibration method, the proposed calibration method can yield superior results with fewer sampling points, highlighting the efficiency of the proposed approach. The calibration framework developed in this study can be extended to other simulation scenarios, contributing to the robust and efficient modelling of natural ventilation systems in various contexts. This research presents a novel calibration method for the SKE model in natural ventilation simulation, providing a more accurate and efficient approach compared to existing methods. The results have important implications for researchers and practitioners working in the field of building energy simulation and sustainability.","PeriodicalId":506254,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","volume":"30 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to improve the accuracy of the standard k − ε (SKE) turbulence model for natural ventilation simulation, a critical component in the analysis and design of energy-efficient buildings. The methodology involves generating 17 design points for the four closure coefficients (C ɛ 1,C ɛ 2,C µ ,σ k ) for the SKE model using 2k full-factorial design of experiment (DOE) with a centre point. A sheltered single storey-building with windward and leeward openings is modelled and simulated using computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to obtain the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Factor of two observation (FAC2) for each design point. Response models for RMSE and FAC2 are then generated, and optimization is employed to maximize FAC2, minimize RMSE, and the combination of both. The results are validated and compared with experimental and simulation data reported in existing literature. The findings indicate that the indoor velocity profiles with closure coefficients obtained by maximizing FAC2 are better aligned with the actual experimental results. Compared with the existing calibration method, the proposed calibration method can yield superior results with fewer sampling points, highlighting the efficiency of the proposed approach. The calibration framework developed in this study can be extended to other simulation scenarios, contributing to the robust and efficient modelling of natural ventilation systems in various contexts. This research presents a novel calibration method for the SKE model in natural ventilation simulation, providing a more accurate and efficient approach compared to existing methods. The results have important implications for researchers and practitioners working in the field of building energy simulation and sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高建筑自然通风模拟精度:利用实验设计校准标准 k - ε 闭合系数
本研究的目的是提高标准 k - ε(SKE)湍流模型在自然通风模拟中的精度,自然通风是分析和设计节能建筑的重要组成部分。该方法包括为 SKE 模型的四个闭合系数(C ɛ 1、C ɛ 2、C µ、σ k)生成 17 个设计点,使用 2k 全因子实验设计(DOE),并以一个点为中心。使用计算流体动力学(CFD)对一栋具有迎风和背风开口的单层遮蔽建筑进行建模和模拟,以获得每个设计点的均方根误差(RMSE)和两观测因子(FAC2)。然后生成 RMSE 和 FAC2 的响应模型,并采用优化方法使 FAC2 最大化、RMSE 最小化以及两者的组合最大化。结果得到了验证,并与现有文献中报告的实验和模拟数据进行了比较。研究结果表明,通过最大化 FAC2 得到的带有闭合系数的室内速度曲线与实际实验结果更加吻合。与现有的校准方法相比,所提出的校准方法能以更少的采样点获得更优的结果,凸显了所提出方法的高效性。本研究开发的校准框架可扩展到其他模拟场景,有助于在各种情况下对自然通风系统进行稳健高效的建模。本研究为自然通风模拟中的 SKE 模型提出了一种新的校准方法,与现有方法相比,提供了一种更准确、更高效的方法。研究结果对建筑能源模拟和可持续发展领域的研究人员和从业人员具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation on solidification process of molten salt-based phase change material as thermal energy storage medium for application in Stirling engine Hydrogen adsorption on titanium-decorated carbyne C12 ring: a DFT study Experimental investigation into the effects of endplate designs for a Savonius turbine Development of zwitterion-functionalized graphene oxide/polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane and fouling evaluation using solutes of varying charges Wind resource assessment for turbine class identification in Bayanzhaganxiang, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1