Smartphones and video as security articulation infrastructures: evidencing Black Lives Matter

IF 4.7 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ia/iiae170
Rune Saugmann Andersen
{"title":"Smartphones and video as security articulation infrastructures: evidencing Black Lives Matter","authors":"Rune Saugmann Andersen","doi":"10.1093/ia/iiae170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Smartphone videos can co-constitute security reality. As smartphones spread in the 2010s, videos of deadly police violence against Black United States citizens became common, and over time these videos co-constituted anti-Black police violence as a security issue, which found its expression as Black Lives Matter (BLM). This article questions the role that smartphones and video play for BLM, and argues that security theory needs a better grasp of security articulation. Mapping the mediation of BLM's first decade, the article documents that smartphones are security articulation infrastructures as bystanders routinely rely on smartphone video to articulate security. The epistemic authority of video enables BLM videos to act as infrastructural gateways connecting established mass media to new vernacular media. Video mediation denies recognized figures of authority interpretive monopoly and enables non-elites to participate in constituting security reality, creating a room for non-elite Black Americans' articulation of insecurity. The article shows that still images and videos are different in this respect, and calls for security theory to take articulation formats and infrastructures seriously. When leaving ‘communication’ to other disciplines or enacting government responses as constitutive of (visual) security, scholarship risks overlooking the epistemic racism limiting security articulation in ‘old’ mass media, and risks making security theory complicit in epistemically silencing the voices of common, marginalized and racialized people.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smartphone videos can co-constitute security reality. As smartphones spread in the 2010s, videos of deadly police violence against Black United States citizens became common, and over time these videos co-constituted anti-Black police violence as a security issue, which found its expression as Black Lives Matter (BLM). This article questions the role that smartphones and video play for BLM, and argues that security theory needs a better grasp of security articulation. Mapping the mediation of BLM's first decade, the article documents that smartphones are security articulation infrastructures as bystanders routinely rely on smartphone video to articulate security. The epistemic authority of video enables BLM videos to act as infrastructural gateways connecting established mass media to new vernacular media. Video mediation denies recognized figures of authority interpretive monopoly and enables non-elites to participate in constituting security reality, creating a room for non-elite Black Americans' articulation of insecurity. The article shows that still images and videos are different in this respect, and calls for security theory to take articulation formats and infrastructures seriously. When leaving ‘communication’ to other disciplines or enacting government responses as constitutive of (visual) security, scholarship risks overlooking the epistemic racism limiting security articulation in ‘old’ mass media, and risks making security theory complicit in epistemically silencing the voices of common, marginalized and racialized people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能手机和视频作为安全衔接基础设施:证明黑人生命的重要性
智能手机视频可以共同构成安全现实。随着智能手机在 2010 年代的普及,警察对美国黑人公民实施致命暴力的视频变得很常见,随着时间的推移,这些视频共同构成了反黑人警察暴力这一安全问题,并以 "黑人生命至上"(Black Lives Matter,BLM)的形式表现出来。本文对智能手机和视频在 BLM 中扮演的角色提出质疑,并认为安全理论需要更好地把握安全表达。文章对 BLM 第一个十年的调解过程进行了描绘,记录了智能手机是安全表述的基础设施,因为旁观者通常依靠智能手机视频来表述安全。视频的认识权威使 BLM 视频成为连接既有大众媒体和新的方言媒体的基础设施网关。视频媒介剥夺了公认的权威人士的解释垄断权,使非精英人士能够参与构成安全现实,为非精英美国黑人表达不安全创造了空间。文章指出,静态图像和视频在这方面有所不同,并呼吁安全理论认真对待表述形式和基础设施。如果将 "交流 "留给其他学科处理,或将政府的应对措施作为(视觉)安全的构成要素,那么学术界就有可能忽视限制 "旧 "大众媒体安全表述的认识论种族主义,并有可能使安全理论成为在认识论上压制普通人、边缘人和种族化人群声音的同谋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric. Indexed/​Abstracted: Web of Science SCIE Scopus CAS INSPEC Portico
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Reconfiguration of van der Waals-like Interface in Superlattice Phase Change Material for Data Storage and Computing Skin-Inspired Flexible Dual-Mode Tactile Sensor for Material and Hardness Perception Structure–Function Coupling in Pyridyl Triazole Copolymers for Neuromorphic Synaptic Transistors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1