Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Burns Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.007
J. Nicolaas Dijkshoorn , Margriet E. van Baar , Anouk Pijpe , Marianne Nieuwenhuis , Harold Goei , Cornelis H. van der Vlies , Inge Spronk
{"title":"Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study","authors":"J. Nicolaas Dijkshoorn ,&nbsp;Margriet E. van Baar ,&nbsp;Anouk Pijpe ,&nbsp;Marianne Nieuwenhuis ,&nbsp;Harold Goei ,&nbsp;Cornelis H. van der Vlies ,&nbsp;Inge Spronk","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Burn scar maturation can take several years but is generally studied shortly after injury. Therefore, we investigated patient-reported scar quality up to 5–7 years post-burn.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with ≤ 20 % total body surface area burned completed the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 2.0) on the same scar at 3, &gt; 18 months (median 28 months) and 5–7 years (median 63 months) post-burn.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-eight patients (21 children; 37 adults) with a median total body surface area burned (TBSA) of 6.3 % participated. Average patient-reported scar quality (POSAS score) was generally worst at 3 months (median score: 4.2), best at 28 months (median score: 2.2) and intermediate at 63 months post-burn (median score: 3.4) (p &lt; 0.001). Many patients (66 %) reported a median 1.8 point higher (worse) POSAS score at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn, whereas 14 % reported an identical, and 21 % a lower (better) score. At any assessment, largest differences with normal skin were reported for scar colour. Univariate predictive factors of long-term patient-reported scar quality were scar quality at 3 months (p = 0.002) and 28 months post-burn (p &lt; 0.001), full-thickness burn size (p = 0.033), length of hospital stay (p = 0.003), and number of surgeries (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Two-thirds of patients with burns up to 20 % TBSA scored the quality of their scars worse at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn. Whether this corresponds to increased dissatisfaction with scars in the long term should be further investigated. These new insights add to the body of knowledge on scar maturation and underscores the importance of discussing patients’ expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"50 9","pages":"Article 107203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924002031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Burn scar maturation can take several years but is generally studied shortly after injury. Therefore, we investigated patient-reported scar quality up to 5–7 years post-burn.

Methods

Patients with ≤ 20 % total body surface area burned completed the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 2.0) on the same scar at 3, > 18 months (median 28 months) and 5–7 years (median 63 months) post-burn.

Results

Fifty-eight patients (21 children; 37 adults) with a median total body surface area burned (TBSA) of 6.3 % participated. Average patient-reported scar quality (POSAS score) was generally worst at 3 months (median score: 4.2), best at 28 months (median score: 2.2) and intermediate at 63 months post-burn (median score: 3.4) (p < 0.001). Many patients (66 %) reported a median 1.8 point higher (worse) POSAS score at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn, whereas 14 % reported an identical, and 21 % a lower (better) score. At any assessment, largest differences with normal skin were reported for scar colour. Univariate predictive factors of long-term patient-reported scar quality were scar quality at 3 months (p = 0.002) and 28 months post-burn (p < 0.001), full-thickness burn size (p = 0.033), length of hospital stay (p = 0.003), and number of surgeries (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Two-thirds of patients with burns up to 20 % TBSA scored the quality of their scars worse at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn. Whether this corresponds to increased dissatisfaction with scars in the long term should be further investigated. These new insights add to the body of knowledge on scar maturation and underscores the importance of discussing patients’ expectations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科和成人烧伤患者的患者报告疤痕质量:长期多中心随访研究
背景:烧伤疤痕成熟可能需要数年时间,但通常在受伤后不久进行研究。因此,我们调查了烧伤后5-7年患者报告的疤痕质量。方法烧伤面积≤20%的患者,于3、5、7、8时对同一疤痕分别填写患者和观察者疤痕评定量表(POSAS 2.0);烧伤后18个月(中位28个月)和5-7年(中位63个月)。结果58例患者(儿童21例;37名成人),烧伤总体表面积(TBSA)中位数为6.3%。患者报告的平均疤痕质量(POSAS评分)通常在烧伤后3个月最差(中位评分:4.2),28个月最佳(中位评分:2.2),63个月中等(中位评分:3.4)(p <;0.001)。与烧伤后28个月相比,许多患者(66%)报告63个月时POSAS评分中位数高1.8分(较差),而14%报告相同,21%报告较低(较好)。在任何评估中,疤痕颜色与正常皮肤的差异最大。患者报告的长期疤痕质量的单因素预测因素为烧伤后3个月(p = 0.002)和28个月(p <;0.001)、全层烧伤大小(p = 0.033)、住院时间(p = 0.003)和手术次数(p <;0.001)。结论三分之二的烧伤患者在烧伤后63个月的疤痕质量评分较烧伤后28个月差。这是否与长期对疤痕的不满增加有关,还有待进一步调查。这些新的见解增加了关于疤痕成熟的知识体系,并强调了讨论患者期望的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
期刊最新文献
The diagnostic pitfall of Marjolin's ulcer in old burn scars: When negative biopsy is misleading - A cautionary report. Effects of socioeconomic status on outcomes in <15% TBSA pediatric burn injuries: A single-institution retrospective study. Plasma metabolomics and scar pathogenesis: Insights from Mendelian randomization analysis. Comment on: "The role of anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography in predicting outcomes of acute ocular burns". Comment on: "Skin grafting as a preventive strategy against infections in children with deep burns".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1