Alex T. Price , Joshua P. Schiff , Alice Silberstein , Robbie Beckert , Tianyu Zhao , Geoffrey D. Hugo , Pamela P. Samson , Eric Laugeman , Lauren E. Henke
{"title":"Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow","authors":"Alex T. Price , Joshua P. Schiff , Alice Silberstein , Robbie Beckert , Tianyu Zhao , Geoffrey D. Hugo , Pamela P. Samson , Eric Laugeman , Lauren E. Henke","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an <em>in silico</em> study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm<sup>3</sup> between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812/pdfft?md5=fb856b62ebccaf8ffa345fd98e38c826&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000812-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an in silico study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).
Materials and Methods
Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.
Results
The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm3 between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.
Conclusion
The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.