Effect of Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Composite to Dentin

Y. El-Bouhi
{"title":"Effect of Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Composite to Dentin","authors":"Y. El-Bouhi","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟髓内压对自粘树脂复合材料与牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响
背景/目的:这项体外研究旨在评估自粘性可流动树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow)在模拟龈内压 IPP 下的微张力粘结强度(µTBS),并将其与传统粘合剂和可流动复合材料组合进行比较。材料和方法:使用 30 颗人类臼齿。施加 15 cm H 2 O 的 IPP。第一组(对照组):第二组:蚀刻 + Adeper Easy One + Z 250;第三组:Adeper Easy One + 可流动复合材料 + Z 250;第四组:蚀刻 + Adeper Easy One + 可流动复合材料 + Z 250;第五组:Vertise Flow + Z 250;第六组:蚀刻 + Vertise Flow + Z 250。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验进行组间比较(P < 0.05)。结果在使用 Adeper Easy One 进行粘接之前对牙本质进行蚀刻,可将 µTBS 显著提高至 25.12 兆帕(标准偏差:5.78 兆帕)。使用可流动复合材料后,µTBS 为 13.62 兆帕(标准差 = 5.50 兆帕),无统计学差异。第四组的平均 µTBS 值最高(31.26 兆帕,S.D. = 6.04 兆帕)。第五组的平均 µTBS 值最低(8.89 兆帕,标准差 = 0.97 兆帕)。第六组在使用 Vertise Flow 前进行的蚀刻显示 µTBS 显著增加到 13.83 兆帕(S.D. = 1.33 兆帕):在使用 Vetise Flow 之前有必要对牙本质进行调节,以获得与传统自酸蚀粘合剂方法相当的 µTBS 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Of Smartphone Application In Improving Oral Hygiene Compared To Oral Instructions In Patients With Plaque-induced Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Histopathological Evaluation of Cholecalciferol Overdose on Tongue Structure of Albino Rats (Immunohistochemical Study) EFFECT OF EXTERNAL COLD AND VIBRATION (BUZZY DEVICE) VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINSTRATION IN CHILDREN: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICALTRIAL STUDY Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND COLOR STABILITY OF MILLED VERSUS 3D PRINTED INTERIM RESTORATION AFTER IMMERSION IN TWO PH MEDIA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1