Robinhood, Reddit, and the news: The impact of traditional and social media on retail investor trading

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Markets Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.finmar.2024.100929
Markus Münster , Felix Reichenbach , Martin Walther
{"title":"Robinhood, Reddit, and the news: The impact of traditional and social media on retail investor trading","authors":"Markus Münster ,&nbsp;Felix Reichenbach ,&nbsp;Martin Walther","doi":"10.1016/j.finmar.2024.100929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the impact of social media posts and news articles on retail trading on Robinhood by analyzing the net buying activity before and after a (social) media publication. Our findings indicate that both publication types lead to an increase of holders. However, both effects are short-lived, and the effect of social media posts on retail trading is significantly higher. Furthermore, investors buy stocks that are recommended on Reddit regardless of text sentiment. However, they act as contrarians by selling stocks with positive news coverage and vice versa. We thus find evidence for both attention- and information-driven trading behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Markets","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418124000478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the impact of social media posts and news articles on retail trading on Robinhood by analyzing the net buying activity before and after a (social) media publication. Our findings indicate that both publication types lead to an increase of holders. However, both effects are short-lived, and the effect of social media posts on retail trading is significantly higher. Furthermore, investors buy stocks that are recommended on Reddit regardless of text sentiment. However, they act as contrarians by selling stocks with positive news coverage and vice versa. We thus find evidence for both attention- and information-driven trading behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robinhood、Reddit 和新闻:传统媒体和社交媒体对散户投资者交易的影响
我们通过分析(社交)媒体发布前后的净购买活动,研究了社交媒体帖子和新闻文章对 Robinhood 上零售交易的影响。我们的研究结果表明,两种发布类型都会导致持有者的增加。然而,这两种效应都是短暂的,社交媒体文章对散户交易的影响明显更大。此外,无论文本情绪如何,投资者都会购买 Reddit 上推荐的股票。但是,他们会逆向操作,卖出正面新闻报道的股票,反之亦然。因此,我们发现了注意力和信息驱动交易行为的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Markets
Journal of Financial Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Markets publishes high quality original research on applied and theoretical issues related to securities trading and pricing. Area of coverage includes the analysis and design of trading mechanisms, optimal order placement strategies, the role of information in securities markets, financial intermediation as it relates to securities investments - for example, the structure of brokerage and mutual fund industries, and analyses of short and long run horizon price behaviour. The journal strives to maintain a balance between theoretical and empirical work, and aims to provide prompt and constructive reviews to paper submitters.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Dealer competition in over-the-counter markets The Chinese trading halt puzzle Does familiarity breed activism? Geography and hedge fund activism Extreme fund performance and investor divergence in beliefs about manager skill
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1