{"title":"1179 Navigating the AI Landscape: Surveying the Use of AI Language Tools for Medical Portfolios","authors":"M. Harris, J. Majchrzak, F. Baig","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae163.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) driven natural language processing have made it possible to use tools such as ChatGPT to generate pieces of text which are realistic, eloquent, and challenging to distinguish from human-generated content. This work aims to answer the question: could the use of these tools for medical portfolios represent a positive opportunity to enhance learning, or would it detract from the purpose of reflective practice?\n \n \n \n In total, 98 post-graduate doctors from across the UK were surveyed to gather data on their awareness of, previous use of, disclosure of use and experience with these tools for their professional portfolios. Their opinions on the need for future guidance in this area were also explored.\n \n \n \n From 90 respondents who currently maintain a professional portfolio, 18 (20%) had used AI-driven tools in some form to generate content for it and none disclosed this use. Regarding disclosing the use of AI-driven tools, 67.3% advocate for this whereas 32.7% believe disclosure is unnecessary. There was slightly stronger consensus regarding how useful guidance from regulatory bodies on this practice would be, with 73.5% in support of guidance and 26.5% in opposition.\n \n \n \n Clearly, there is an urgent need for larger studies, discussion, and consensus from regulatory bodies so that guidance can be put in place. Without this, maintaining the integrity of CPD will become challenging for both trainee doctors and assessors of medical portfolios.\n","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae163.124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) driven natural language processing have made it possible to use tools such as ChatGPT to generate pieces of text which are realistic, eloquent, and challenging to distinguish from human-generated content. This work aims to answer the question: could the use of these tools for medical portfolios represent a positive opportunity to enhance learning, or would it detract from the purpose of reflective practice?
In total, 98 post-graduate doctors from across the UK were surveyed to gather data on their awareness of, previous use of, disclosure of use and experience with these tools for their professional portfolios. Their opinions on the need for future guidance in this area were also explored.
From 90 respondents who currently maintain a professional portfolio, 18 (20%) had used AI-driven tools in some form to generate content for it and none disclosed this use. Regarding disclosing the use of AI-driven tools, 67.3% advocate for this whereas 32.7% believe disclosure is unnecessary. There was slightly stronger consensus regarding how useful guidance from regulatory bodies on this practice would be, with 73.5% in support of guidance and 26.5% in opposition.
Clearly, there is an urgent need for larger studies, discussion, and consensus from regulatory bodies so that guidance can be put in place. Without this, maintaining the integrity of CPD will become challenging for both trainee doctors and assessors of medical portfolios.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology.
While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.