‘Evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational interstitial lung disease in railway workers’

Islam M. Mostafa, G. Salem, Maryam A. A. Kader, Dina Ruby
{"title":"‘Evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational interstitial lung disease in railway workers’","authors":"Islam M. Mostafa, G. Salem, Maryam A. A. Kader, Dina Ruby","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_37_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Occupational lung diseases include a wide variety of respiratory diseases with clinical manifestations and diagnostic test results that have features similar to nonoccupational diseases.\n \n \n \n To determine the prevalence of occupational Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) among confirmed ILD patients admitted to the chest department of Egyptian Railway Medical Centre and the assessment of the outcome.\n \n \n \n A total of 155 patients with confirmed ILD, were subdivided into two groups: group (A) 79 patients with occupational exposure and group (B) 76 patients with nonoccupational exposure. Both groups were subjected to a detailed history, radiological assessment, arterial blood gases, and Spirometry. Data of days of hospital stay were also recorded.\n \n \n \n The prevalence of confirmed cases of ILD among occupational exposure was 1.49% versus 1.1% in the nonoccupational. Range of age in occupational group was between (31and 68 years). Chest X ray (CXR) findings were positive in 58.2% and 30.2% of occupational and nonoccupational group, respectively. Among group (A), 47.1% of the patients stayed between 11 and 15 days), 15.76% admitted to ICU, and 5.2% were mechanically ventilated. While 48% of hospitalized nonoccupational patients stayed between 6 and 10 days, 8% were admitted to ICU and 4% were mechanically ventilated.\n \n \n \n The prevalence of interstitial lung diseases with occupational exposure was 1.49%, higher than non-occupational interstitial lung diseases. They were younger in age, had history of domiciliary oxygen therapy, frequent exacerbations, and previous hospital admissions. They had prolonged length of hospital stay, particularly those not using protective measures.\n","PeriodicalId":519530,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_37_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational lung diseases include a wide variety of respiratory diseases with clinical manifestations and diagnostic test results that have features similar to nonoccupational diseases. To determine the prevalence of occupational Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) among confirmed ILD patients admitted to the chest department of Egyptian Railway Medical Centre and the assessment of the outcome. A total of 155 patients with confirmed ILD, were subdivided into two groups: group (A) 79 patients with occupational exposure and group (B) 76 patients with nonoccupational exposure. Both groups were subjected to a detailed history, radiological assessment, arterial blood gases, and Spirometry. Data of days of hospital stay were also recorded. The prevalence of confirmed cases of ILD among occupational exposure was 1.49% versus 1.1% in the nonoccupational. Range of age in occupational group was between (31and 68 years). Chest X ray (CXR) findings were positive in 58.2% and 30.2% of occupational and nonoccupational group, respectively. Among group (A), 47.1% of the patients stayed between 11 and 15 days), 15.76% admitted to ICU, and 5.2% were mechanically ventilated. While 48% of hospitalized nonoccupational patients stayed between 6 and 10 days, 8% were admitted to ICU and 4% were mechanically ventilated. The prevalence of interstitial lung diseases with occupational exposure was 1.49%, higher than non-occupational interstitial lung diseases. They were younger in age, had history of domiciliary oxygen therapy, frequent exacerbations, and previous hospital admissions. They had prolonged length of hospital stay, particularly those not using protective measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估铁路工人的职业性和非职业性间质性肺病
职业性肺部疾病包括多种呼吸系统疾病,其临床表现和诊断测试结果与非职业性疾病的特征相似。 目的:确定埃及铁路医疗中心胸科收治的确诊间质性肺病(ILD)患者中职业性间质性肺病(ILD)的发病率,并评估其疗效。 共 155 名确诊的间质性肺病患者被细分为两组:一组(A)79 名有职业暴露的患者,另一组(B)76 名无职业暴露的患者。两组患者均接受了详细的病史、放射学评估、动脉血气和肺活量测定。此外,还记录了住院天数数据。 在职业接触人群中,确诊的 ILD 病例发病率为 1.49%,而非职业接触人群的发病率为 1.1%。职业人群的年龄范围在 31 岁至 68 岁之间。职业组和非职业组中分别有 58.2% 和 30.2% 的人胸部 X 线检查结果呈阳性。在(A)组中,47.1%的患者住院时间在 11-15 天之间,15.76%的患者住进了重症监护室,5.2%的患者接受了机械通气。48%的非职业性住院病人住院时间为 6 至 10 天,8%的病人住进了重症监护室,4%的病人接受了机械通气。 与职业接触有关的间质性肺病发病率为 1.49%,高于非职业间质性肺病。他们的年龄较轻,有家庭氧疗史,病情经常加重,曾入院治疗。他们的住院时间较长,尤其是那些没有采取保护措施的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of clinical management and radiological affection of coronavirus disease 2019 patients under isolation: an experience from a University Hospital Randomized prospective trial comparing two schedules of hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy 3 weeks against 1 week fractionation regimen in females with breast cancer ECG abnormalities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: can the ECG record still astound us? A prospective study Strengthening the transportation network to improve diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: role of postal services Comparative evaluation of baseline SOFA score and CURB-65 score in predicting patient severity and outcome in COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary care ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1