In-processing and post-processing strategies for balancing accuracy and sustainability in product recommendations

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101433
Chloe Satinet , François Fouss , Marco Saerens , Pierre Leleux
{"title":"In-processing and post-processing strategies for balancing accuracy and sustainability in product recommendations","authors":"Chloe Satinet ,&nbsp;François Fouss ,&nbsp;Marco Saerens ,&nbsp;Pierre Leleux","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many e-commerce websites use product recommendation systems. With the growing awareness of the environmental impact of our consumption, these recommender systems, well-known for encouraging purchases and consumption, are being challenged. In recent literature, it has been suggested that recommender systems should balance the exploitation of existing preferences with the exploration of sustainable items, i.e., to make sustainable alternatives more accessible to consumers and promote sustainable consumption habits. In this paper, we therefore analyse how to increase the presence of sustainable products in recommendation lists, without overly decreasing their accuracy. More precisely, we test three in-processing and four post-processing strategies using an offline experimental design. The post-processing strategies 1 (relevance scores’ adjustment) and 3.1. (incremental list formation with calibration) manage to offer interesting accuracy-sustainability trade-offs on our datasets. For instance, by applying post-processing strategy 3.1 to a content-based recommendation algorithm, a gain of up to 20% can be achieved for the sustainability metric without any loss of accuracy. Greater sustainability improvements can be achieved if a loss of accuracy is tolerated. For practitioners, i.e., e-commerce platforms, this means that they could continue to offer relevant recommendations while promoting a more sustainable consumption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101433"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many e-commerce websites use product recommendation systems. With the growing awareness of the environmental impact of our consumption, these recommender systems, well-known for encouraging purchases and consumption, are being challenged. In recent literature, it has been suggested that recommender systems should balance the exploitation of existing preferences with the exploration of sustainable items, i.e., to make sustainable alternatives more accessible to consumers and promote sustainable consumption habits. In this paper, we therefore analyse how to increase the presence of sustainable products in recommendation lists, without overly decreasing their accuracy. More precisely, we test three in-processing and four post-processing strategies using an offline experimental design. The post-processing strategies 1 (relevance scores’ adjustment) and 3.1. (incremental list formation with calibration) manage to offer interesting accuracy-sustainability trade-offs on our datasets. For instance, by applying post-processing strategy 3.1 to a content-based recommendation algorithm, a gain of up to 20% can be achieved for the sustainability metric without any loss of accuracy. Greater sustainability improvements can be achieved if a loss of accuracy is tolerated. For practitioners, i.e., e-commerce platforms, this means that they could continue to offer relevant recommendations while promoting a more sustainable consumption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡产品推荐准确性和可持续性的处理中和处理后策略
许多电子商务网站都使用产品推荐系统。随着人们越来越意识到消费对环境的影响,这些以鼓励购买和消费而闻名的推荐系统正在受到挑战。最近有文献建议,推荐系统应在利用现有偏好与探索可持续商品之间取得平衡,即让消费者更容易获得可持续的替代品,并促进可持续消费习惯的养成。因此,我们在本文中分析了如何增加可持续产品在推荐列表中的存在,同时又不过分降低其准确性。更确切地说,我们采用离线实验设计,测试了三种事中处理策略和四种事后处理策略。后处理策略 1(相关性分数调整)和 3.1.(带校准的增量列表形成)能够在我们的数据集上提供有趣的准确性-可持续性权衡。例如,通过将后处理策略 3.1 应用于基于内容的推荐算法,在不损失任何准确性的情况下,可持续性指标可获得高达 20% 的增益。如果能够容忍准确性的损失,则可实现更大的可持续性改进。对于从业者(即电子商务平台)来说,这意味着他们可以继续提供相关推荐,同时促进更可持续的消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode? Home is best: Review source and cross-border online shopping Sustaining superior visibility within digital platforms through inside and outside competitive action repertoires The effects of physician’s brand positioning on diagnostic dispensing continuity and cross-provincial healthcare flow: Evidence from an online traditional Chinese medicine community Physical stores versus physical showrooms: Channel structures of online retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1