Flap Versus Flapless Implant Placement in Immediate Functional Loading: A Comparative Study

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24
Piyush Javiya, T. Anjan, S. Duseja, Jeevan Matada Basavarajaiah, Jignesh Tate, Rahul Puthenkandathil, F. Baig
{"title":"Flap Versus Flapless Implant Placement in Immediate Functional Loading: A Comparative Study","authors":"Piyush Javiya, T. Anjan, S. Duseja, Jeevan Matada Basavarajaiah, Jignesh Tate, Rahul Puthenkandathil, F. Baig","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Dental implants are now the typical tooth replacement method. Because it speeds up therapy, quick functional loading—attaching prosthetic restorations to implants following surgery—has become popular. Flapless implant implantation reduces surgical stress and expedites recovery.\n \n \n \n A prospective comparative study of 100 flap and flapless dental implant patients was done. Patient-reported outcomes, implant survival, peri-implant parameters, and surgical complications were assessed. Statistical analysis compared the two groups’ results.\n \n \n \n Both flap and flapless methods exhibited good implant survival and similar peri-implant characteristics. Patients reported equal postoperative comfort and satisfaction in both groups. Surgical complications were similar for flap and flapless surgeries.\n \n \n \n In immediate functional loading, flap and flapless implant insertion are equally effective and safe. Both methods yield dependable implant survival, peri-implant health, patient comfort, and surgical safety. Dental professionals should evaluate patient variables and anatomical aspects while choosing an implant implantation surgery. Implant dentistry needs further study on long-term results and treatment regimens.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dental implants are now the typical tooth replacement method. Because it speeds up therapy, quick functional loading—attaching prosthetic restorations to implants following surgery—has become popular. Flapless implant implantation reduces surgical stress and expedites recovery. A prospective comparative study of 100 flap and flapless dental implant patients was done. Patient-reported outcomes, implant survival, peri-implant parameters, and surgical complications were assessed. Statistical analysis compared the two groups’ results. Both flap and flapless methods exhibited good implant survival and similar peri-implant characteristics. Patients reported equal postoperative comfort and satisfaction in both groups. Surgical complications were similar for flap and flapless surgeries. In immediate functional loading, flap and flapless implant insertion are equally effective and safe. Both methods yield dependable implant survival, peri-implant health, patient comfort, and surgical safety. Dental professionals should evaluate patient variables and anatomical aspects while choosing an implant implantation surgery. Implant dentistry needs further study on long-term results and treatment regimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即刻功能负荷中的翻瓣与无瓣种植体植入:比较研究
摘要 牙种植体是目前典型的牙齿替换方法。由于可以加快治疗速度,快速功能加载--在手术后将修复体安装到种植体上--已变得非常流行。无瓣种植可减少手术压力并加快恢复。 我们对 100 名翻瓣和无瓣种植牙患者进行了前瞻性比较研究。对患者报告的结果、种植体存活率、种植体周围参数和手术并发症进行了评估。统计分析比较了两组结果。 翻瓣法和无瓣法都显示出良好的种植体存活率和相似的种植体周围特征。两组患者的术后舒适度和满意度相当。翻瓣和无瓣手术的并发症相似。 在即刻功能负荷中,翻瓣和无瓣种植体植入同样有效和安全。两种方法都能保证种植体的存活率、种植体周围的健康、患者的舒适度和手术的安全性。牙科专业人员在选择种植体植入手术时,应评估患者的变量和解剖学方面的因素。种植牙的长期效果和治疗方案还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Tele-Orthodontics in Enhancing Patient Compliance and Treatment Monitoring Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Dry Eye Syndrome: An In vitro Investigation Enhancing Precision in Endodontic Procedures: An In vitro Investigation of Magnification and Enhanced Visualization Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Techniques for Pterygium Management: An In Vitro Study Schoolchildren’s Musculoskeletal Pain and Backpack Weight Impact on Posture: A Short-Term Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1