Effectiveness of natural remineralizing agents on microhardness of white spot lesions: In vitro study

Ehsan Hossam Eldin Aly, Yousra mohamed Abdelrahem, M. Eliwa
{"title":"Effectiveness of natural remineralizing agents on microhardness of white spot lesions: In vitro study","authors":"Ehsan Hossam Eldin Aly, Yousra mohamed Abdelrahem, M. Eliwa","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.286885.3027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This in vitro study is conducted to compare the effect of extracts of Ginger and Rosemary on the microhardness of white spot lesions to sodium fluoride varnish. Materials and methods: The current study used thirty extracted incisors. Ten teeth(n = 10) in each group had a remineralizing treatment: group 1:rosemary, group 2: ginger, and group 3: sodium fluoride varnish. A nail polish was applied on labial surfaces except to a window of 4x4mm and the microhardness test was done. Then all samples were immersed in demineralizing solution for four days to produce white spot lesions. Then testing microhardness was conducted. The remineralizing agents were applied to each group for ten days. The samples were immersed in artificial saliva between treatments. Lastly, microhardness test was conducted. Results: ANOVA test was used to Compare between groups. Comparison within the same group was performed using a paired t-test. The Fluoride group was not significantly different than the other 2 groups after remineralization, The mean value was 63.04±3.79 in the fluoride group, in comparison to 64.01±3.85 in the Ginger group and 62.20±3.91 in the Rosemary group. The mean value recorded in the rosemary group was significantly higher than ginger group (p=0.047). Considering the percent of change from Demineralization to remineralization the highest mean value of percentage increase occurred in the ginger group (34.50±18; median 30.98), succeeded by fluoride (30.49±15.54; median 32.53). Conclusions: Rosemary, ginger, and fluoride varnish reduce white spot lesions and are more favorable for prevention and remineralization of early enamel lesions.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.286885.3027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study is conducted to compare the effect of extracts of Ginger and Rosemary on the microhardness of white spot lesions to sodium fluoride varnish. Materials and methods: The current study used thirty extracted incisors. Ten teeth(n = 10) in each group had a remineralizing treatment: group 1:rosemary, group 2: ginger, and group 3: sodium fluoride varnish. A nail polish was applied on labial surfaces except to a window of 4x4mm and the microhardness test was done. Then all samples were immersed in demineralizing solution for four days to produce white spot lesions. Then testing microhardness was conducted. The remineralizing agents were applied to each group for ten days. The samples were immersed in artificial saliva between treatments. Lastly, microhardness test was conducted. Results: ANOVA test was used to Compare between groups. Comparison within the same group was performed using a paired t-test. The Fluoride group was not significantly different than the other 2 groups after remineralization, The mean value was 63.04±3.79 in the fluoride group, in comparison to 64.01±3.85 in the Ginger group and 62.20±3.91 in the Rosemary group. The mean value recorded in the rosemary group was significantly higher than ginger group (p=0.047). Considering the percent of change from Demineralization to remineralization the highest mean value of percentage increase occurred in the ginger group (34.50±18; median 30.98), succeeded by fluoride (30.49±15.54; median 32.53). Conclusions: Rosemary, ginger, and fluoride varnish reduce white spot lesions and are more favorable for prevention and remineralization of early enamel lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然再矿化剂对白斑病变微硬度的影响:体外研究
目的:本体外研究旨在比较生姜和迷迭香提取物对氟化钠漆膜白斑病变微硬度的影响。材料和方法:本研究使用了 30 颗拔出的门牙。每组 10 颗牙齿(n = 10)进行再矿化处理:第 1 组:迷迭香,第 2 组:生姜,第 3 组:氟化钠清漆。在唇面涂上指甲油,但不超过 4x4mm 的窗口,然后进行显微硬度测试。然后将所有样本浸泡在脱矿物质溶液中四天,以产生白斑病变。然后进行显微硬度测试。每组样品均使用再矿化剂十天。在两次处理之间,将样品浸泡在人工唾液中。最后进行显微硬度测试。结果组间比较采用方差分析。同组内的比较采用配对 t 检验。氟化物组的平均值为 63.04±3.79,而生姜组为 64.01±3.85,迷迭香组为 62.20±3.91。迷迭香组的平均值明显高于生姜组(P=0.047)。考虑到从脱矿化到再矿化的百分比变化,生姜组的百分比增加平均值最高(34.50±18;中位数为 30.98),其次是氟化物组(30.49±15.54;中位数为 32.53)。结论迷迭香、生姜和氟化物涂膜可减少白斑病变,更有利于早期釉质病变的预防和再矿化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Of Smartphone Application In Improving Oral Hygiene Compared To Oral Instructions In Patients With Plaque-induced Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Histopathological Evaluation of Cholecalciferol Overdose on Tongue Structure of Albino Rats (Immunohistochemical Study) EFFECT OF EXTERNAL COLD AND VIBRATION (BUZZY DEVICE) VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINSTRATION IN CHILDREN: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICALTRIAL STUDY Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND COLOR STABILITY OF MILLED VERSUS 3D PRINTED INTERIM RESTORATION AFTER IMMERSION IN TWO PH MEDIA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1