Which Side Are You On?

Charles Bernstein
{"title":"Which Side Are You On?","authors":"Charles Bernstein","doi":"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.41.1.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recollections of the author’s 1983 speech on Williams at the MLA Annual Convention led to a critique of his formulation of “official verse culture” with special reference to Randall Jarrell. Are there “sides” in modernist and contemporary American poetry? Some poets seem to be embraced by “both sides” (including, but not at all times, Williams), while others, equally significant, are not. Cultural homogeneity, often unconscious, works against aesthetically necessary diversity. In 1983, as well as in this work, the author employed rhetorical strategies for poetic ends, or possibly vice versa. A strong argument is made for Williams not only as a great poet but a supernal—indeed foundational—thinker for modernist and contemporary poetics.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.41.1.0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recollections of the author’s 1983 speech on Williams at the MLA Annual Convention led to a critique of his formulation of “official verse culture” with special reference to Randall Jarrell. Are there “sides” in modernist and contemporary American poetry? Some poets seem to be embraced by “both sides” (including, but not at all times, Williams), while others, equally significant, are not. Cultural homogeneity, often unconscious, works against aesthetically necessary diversity. In 1983, as well as in this work, the author employed rhetorical strategies for poetic ends, or possibly vice versa. A strong argument is made for Williams not only as a great poet but a supernal—indeed foundational—thinker for modernist and contemporary poetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你站在哪一边?
通过回忆作者 1983 年在文学和艺术协会年会上关于威廉姆斯的演讲,对他提出的 "官方诗歌文化 "进行了批判,并特别提到了兰德尔-贾雷尔(Randall Jarrell)。现代主义和当代美国诗歌是否存在 "两派"?一些诗人似乎被 "双方 "所接受(包括威廉姆斯,但并非始终如此),而另一些同样重要的诗人却没有被接受。文化的同一性,往往是无意识的,与美学上必要的多样性背道而驰。在《1983 年》和这部作品中,作者运用了修辞策略来达到诗歌的目的,反之亦然。威廉斯不仅是一位伟大的诗人,而且是现代主义和当代诗学的奠基人,这一点得到了有力的论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“No One to Witness and Adjust”: The Academy Still in Peril Spring and All No Longer in Peril Spring and All: The Present 100 Years Later Modernist Hangover? William Carlos Williams as Bob Perelman’s Poetic Cure Which Side Are You On?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1