La rigueur scientifique de l’approche expertale

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2024.06.001
Ridouan Hammouch Professeur Maître de Conférence - Docteur en Droit Privé , Yamna Fatmi Professeure universitaire - P.E.S.
{"title":"La rigueur scientifique de l’approche expertale","authors":"Ridouan Hammouch Professeur Maître de Conférence - Docteur en Droit Privé ,&nbsp;Yamna Fatmi Professeure universitaire - P.E.S.","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Experts are crucial in legal disputes that involve technical matters beyond a judge's competence. Procedural requirements and the judge's assessment of an expert's conclusions provide control guarantees to ensure the reliability of scientific expertise. Experts are obligated to follow objective and rigorous investigation processes, with a professional duty to accuracy and logical approaches. This article examines how judges can control the scientific rigor of experts’ approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2024 188","pages":"Pages 87-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experts are crucial in legal disputes that involve technical matters beyond a judge's competence. Procedural requirements and the judge's assessment of an expert's conclusions provide control guarantees to ensure the reliability of scientific expertise. Experts are obligated to follow objective and rigorous investigation processes, with a professional duty to accuracy and logical approaches. This article examines how judges can control the scientific rigor of experts’ approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家方法的科学严谨性
在涉及超出法官权限的技术问题的法律纠纷中,专家至关重要。程序要求和法官对专家结论的评估为确保科学专业知识的可靠性提供了控制保障。专家有义务遵循客观、严谨的调查程序,对准确性和逻辑方法负有专业责任。本文探讨了法官如何控制专家方法的科学严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents IA et médecine : quand les avancées technologiques redéfinissent les règles d’une IA responsable dans le domaine de la santé Dérives thérapeutiques : la loi pénale contre les faux remèdes L’extraction des dents de sagesse : responsabilité étude de la jurisprudence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1