Permeability evolution of fluid-injection-reactivated granite fractures of contrasting roughnesses

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Underground Space Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2024.02.007
Fengshou Zhang , Guanpeng He , Mengke An , Rui Huang , Derek Elsworth
{"title":"Permeability evolution of fluid-injection-reactivated granite fractures of contrasting roughnesses","authors":"Fengshou Zhang ,&nbsp;Guanpeng He ,&nbsp;Mengke An ,&nbsp;Rui Huang ,&nbsp;Derek Elsworth","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fracture/fault instability induced by fluid injection in deep geothermal reservoirs could not only vary the reservoir permeability but also trigger hazardous seismicity. To address this, we conducted triaxial shear experiments on granite fractures with different architected roughnesses reactivated under fluid injection, to investigate the controls on permeability evolution linked to reactivation. Our results indicate that the fracture roughness and injection strategies are two main factors affecting permeability evolution. For fractures with different roughnesses, a rougher fracture leads to a lower peak reactivated permeability (<em>k</em><sub>max</sub>), and varying the fluid injection strategy (including the confining pressure and injection rate) has a less impact on <em>k</em><sub>max</sub>, indicating that the evolution of permeability during fluid pressurization is likely to be determined by the fracture roughness along the shear direction. Both the fracture roughness and injection strategies affect the average rates of permeability change and this parameter also reflects the long-term reservoir recovery. Our results have important implications for understanding the permeability evolution and the injection-induced fracture/fault slips in granite reservoirs during the deep geothermal energy extraction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 33-45"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000631/pdfft?md5=b8c7f8910f33c92161733ec946e116f2&pid=1-s2.0-S2467967424000631-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424000631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fracture/fault instability induced by fluid injection in deep geothermal reservoirs could not only vary the reservoir permeability but also trigger hazardous seismicity. To address this, we conducted triaxial shear experiments on granite fractures with different architected roughnesses reactivated under fluid injection, to investigate the controls on permeability evolution linked to reactivation. Our results indicate that the fracture roughness and injection strategies are two main factors affecting permeability evolution. For fractures with different roughnesses, a rougher fracture leads to a lower peak reactivated permeability (kmax), and varying the fluid injection strategy (including the confining pressure and injection rate) has a less impact on kmax, indicating that the evolution of permeability during fluid pressurization is likely to be determined by the fracture roughness along the shear direction. Both the fracture roughness and injection strategies affect the average rates of permeability change and this parameter also reflects the long-term reservoir recovery. Our results have important implications for understanding the permeability evolution and the injection-induced fracture/fault slips in granite reservoirs during the deep geothermal energy extraction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同粗糙度的注液活化花岗岩断裂的渗透性演变
在深层地热储层中注入流体诱发的断裂/断层不稳定性不仅会改变储层渗透率,还会引发危险的地震。为此,我们对注入流体后重新活化的具有不同粗糙度的花岗岩断裂进行了三轴剪切实验,以研究与重新活化相关的渗透率演变控制因素。结果表明,断裂粗糙度和注入策略是影响渗透率演变的两个主要因素。对于不同粗糙度的裂缝,较粗糙的裂缝会导致较低的再活化渗透率峰值(kmax),而改变流体注入策略(包括封闭压力和注入速度)对kmax的影响较小,这表明流体加压过程中渗透率的演变可能是由沿剪切方向的裂缝粗糙度决定的。裂缝粗糙度和注入策略都会影响渗透率的平均变化率,这一参数也反映了储层的长期恢复情况。我们的研究结果对于理解花岗岩储层在深层地热能源开采过程中的渗透率演化和注入诱发的断裂/断层滑动具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
期刊最新文献
Series of centrifuge shaking table tests study on seismic response of subway station structures in soft soil sites Analysis of hydraulic breakdown and seepage of tail sealing system in shield tunnel machines Back analysis of geomechanical parameters based on a data augmentation algorithm and machine learning technique Characteristics of deformation and defect of shield tunnel in coastal structured soil in China Numerical analysis of a deep and oversized group excavation: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1