Differences in perception of general anesthesia for pediatric dental treatment between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists in Japan

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pediatric Dental Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pdj.2024.06.001
Tomoka Matsumura , Shigeru Maeda , Tsutomu Iwamoto , Takehiko Iijima
{"title":"Differences in perception of general anesthesia for pediatric dental treatment between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists in Japan","authors":"Tomoka Matsumura ,&nbsp;Shigeru Maeda ,&nbsp;Tsutomu Iwamoto ,&nbsp;Takehiko Iijima","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span><span>In Japan, the use of general anesthesia for </span>dental treatment (GAD) is common in patients with intellectual disabilities. However, GAD in uncooperative </span>pediatric patients without intellectual disabilities is uncommon.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the variance in acceptance of GAD between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists contributed to its limited use in uncooperative children.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A questionnaire-based survey was administered to dentists certified by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry (JSPD) and the Japanese Society of Dental Anesthesiologists (JDSA). The questionnaire included questions regarding the implementation and understanding of general anesthesia and sedation in children. The responses from both groups were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that 63% of the JDSA group believed that restraints in dental treatment negatively affect intellectual development, compared to only 37% of the JSPD group. Additionally, 84% of the JDSA group preferred GA as it avoids interruption of treatment for uncooperative pediatric patients, compared to only 42% of the JSPD group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dental anesthesiologists and pediatric dentists have different perceptions of GAD, and more communication is needed to establish optimal indications for GAD in pediatric patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239424000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In Japan, the use of general anesthesia for dental treatment (GAD) is common in patients with intellectual disabilities. However, GAD in uncooperative pediatric patients without intellectual disabilities is uncommon.

Aim

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the variance in acceptance of GAD between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists contributed to its limited use in uncooperative children.

Materials and methods

A questionnaire-based survey was administered to dentists certified by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry (JSPD) and the Japanese Society of Dental Anesthesiologists (JDSA). The questionnaire included questions regarding the implementation and understanding of general anesthesia and sedation in children. The responses from both groups were compared.

Results

The results showed that 63% of the JDSA group believed that restraints in dental treatment negatively affect intellectual development, compared to only 37% of the JSPD group. Additionally, 84% of the JDSA group preferred GA as it avoids interruption of treatment for uncooperative pediatric patients, compared to only 42% of the JSPD group.

Conclusion

Dental anesthesiologists and pediatric dentists have different perceptions of GAD, and more communication is needed to establish optimal indications for GAD in pediatric patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本儿童牙医和牙科麻醉师对儿童牙科治疗全身麻醉的认识差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Dental Journal
Pediatric Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
26 days
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of molar-incisor hypomineralization in Mexican population: A systematic review and meta-analysis Deciduous teeth eruption, gross motor skills, and feeding in children with down syndrome: A cross-sectional study Oral manifestations of Burkitts Lymphoma - Literature review and case report of Burkitt's lymphoma in a 5 years old female Integration of single cell analysis of dental mesenchyme and human disease database identifies the responsible gene of dentin disorders Hypoxia enhances osteoclastogenesis in periodontal ligament cells via expression of VEGF and RANKL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1