Challenge-Based Learning for Competency Development in Engineering Education, a Prisma-Based Systematic Literature Review

IF 2.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES IEEE Transactions on Education Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1109/TE.2024.3417908
Andreia Leles;Luciana Zaina;José Roberto Cardoso
{"title":"Challenge-Based Learning for Competency Development in Engineering Education, a Prisma-Based Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Andreia Leles;Luciana Zaina;José Roberto Cardoso","doi":"10.1109/TE.2024.3417908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The teaching-learning process in engineering aims to meet current societal demands and address real challenges faced by businesses and the job market. Challenge-based learning (CBL) has gained traction as an active and innovative approach in engineering education, introducing real challenges and open questions to the classroom regarding environmental sustainability and issues faced by Industry 4.0. These challenges require resources and technology that turn the teaching-learning process into an open system, demanding partnerships beyond academia for validating deliverables and projects. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study aimed to systematically analyze the implementation and implications of CBL for competencies development. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PRISMA method, 62 articles were used for abstract analyses to identify methods, workload, resources, structure, technology, and stakeholder integration, as well as to answer the research questions. The studies were categorized into three types of applied challenges: 1) social and environmental sustainability; 2) Industry 4.0; and 3) those related to Educational Institutions. A total of 46 articles were analyzed in their entirety, and summarized in three tables. All analyzed studies showed that CBL is effective according to summative and formative assessments, leading to sociotechnical competencies development through experience with real-world challenges, teamwork, and interaction with external partners. As most studies are qualitative, there is room for quantitative investigations to better justify the relevance of CBL, especially in terms of adaptive and personalized learning. Moreover, the workload and complexity imposed by CBL, particularly on teachers, warrant further study to facilitate implementation and engagement.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10600095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10600095/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The teaching-learning process in engineering aims to meet current societal demands and address real challenges faced by businesses and the job market. Challenge-based learning (CBL) has gained traction as an active and innovative approach in engineering education, introducing real challenges and open questions to the classroom regarding environmental sustainability and issues faced by Industry 4.0. These challenges require resources and technology that turn the teaching-learning process into an open system, demanding partnerships beyond academia for validating deliverables and projects. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study aimed to systematically analyze the implementation and implications of CBL for competencies development. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PRISMA method, 62 articles were used for abstract analyses to identify methods, workload, resources, structure, technology, and stakeholder integration, as well as to answer the research questions. The studies were categorized into three types of applied challenges: 1) social and environmental sustainability; 2) Industry 4.0; and 3) those related to Educational Institutions. A total of 46 articles were analyzed in their entirety, and summarized in three tables. All analyzed studies showed that CBL is effective according to summative and formative assessments, leading to sociotechnical competencies development through experience with real-world challenges, teamwork, and interaction with external partners. As most studies are qualitative, there is room for quantitative investigations to better justify the relevance of CBL, especially in terms of adaptive and personalized learning. Moreover, the workload and complexity imposed by CBL, particularly on teachers, warrant further study to facilitate implementation and engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程教育中基于挑战的能力培养学习--基于棱镜的系统文献综述
工程学的教学过程旨在满足当前的社会需求,应对企业和就业市场面临的实际挑战。基于挑战的学习(CBL)作为一种积极创新的工程学教育方法,在课堂上引入了有关环境可持续发展和工业 4.0 所面临问题的真实挑战和开放性问题,因而受到了广泛关注。这些挑战需要资源和技术,将教学过程变成一个开放的系统,需要学术界以外的合作伙伴来验证交付成果和项目。根据 PRISMA 2020 准则,本研究旨在系统分析 CBL 在能力培养方面的实施情况和影响。按照 PRISMA 方法的纳入和排除标准,对 62 篇文章进行了摘要分析,以确定方法、工作量、资源、结构、技术和利益相关者整合,并回答研究问题。这些研究分为三类应用挑战:1) 社会和环境可持续性;2) 工业 4.0;3) 与教育机构相关的挑战。共对 46 篇文章进行了全面分析,并在三个表格中进行了总结。所有分析研究都表明,根据终结性评估和形成性评估,CBL 是有效的,通过体验真实世界的挑战、团队合作以及与外部伙伴的互动,培养了社会技术能力。由于大多数研究都是定性研究,因此还需要进行定量调查,以更好地证明 CBL 的相关性,特别是在适应性和个性化学习方面。此外,CBL 带来的工作量和复杂性,特别是对教师的影响,值得进一步研究,以促进实施和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Education
IEEE Transactions on Education 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Education Information for Authors IEEE Transactions on Education Publication Information Development and Evaluation of Remote Laboratory System for Simulated Induction Motor Developing and Validating the Contextual Technology Andragogy/Pedagogy Entrepreneurship Work Content Knowledge Model: A Framework for Vocational Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1