Abortion on Campus: Sexual Liberation and Reproductive Control at Southern Colleges and Universities before 1973

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a932554
Lisa Lindquist Dorr
{"title":"Abortion on Campus: Sexual Liberation and Reproductive Control at Southern Colleges and Universities before 1973","authors":"Lisa Lindquist Dorr","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a932554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Abortion on Campus: <span>Sexual Liberation and Reproductive Control at Southern Colleges and Universities before 1973</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Lisa Lindquist Dorr (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>O</strong><small>n</small> O<small>ctober</small> 6, 1971, R<small>on</small> S<small>achs</small>, <small>editor of the</small> U<small>niversity of</small> Florida’s student newspaper, the <em>Florida Alligator</em>, was arrested for violating the state’s 1868 law prohibiting abortion. Sachs had not provided or been involved directly in any abortion himself. Instead, he was charged with violating the section of the law that prohibited the dissemination of any information that could lead to abortion.<sup>1</sup> Against the advice of the president and university attorneys, Sachs and his editorial team had published a list of abortion referral and counseling services in the October 6 edition of the <em>Alligator</em>. These services counseled women with unwanted pregnancies and provided information on competent abortion providers. Florida students, the editors believed, deserved information about abortion referral services regardless of the law, as debate on campus over the previous few years had made clear. The charges against Sachs ultimately were dismissed, with a ruling that Florida’s abortion law violated women’s privacy and that the prohibition on information was a violation of free speech rights. Two months later, in February 1972, the Florida Supreme Court concurred, throwing out <strong>[End Page 539]</strong> Florida’s 1868 law entirely.<sup>2</sup> As a result, college newspapers in Florida were free to publish information about where women could seek safe abortions. Student newspapers nationwide celebrated Sachs’s victory, as did several major newspapers in the state and around the country. The University of Florida even went a step further, providing its own on- campus referral service through the Student Government Association, recognizing Florida students’ interest in the procedure.</p> <p>The story of Sachs’s victory for abortion rights has been resurrected recently in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court decision <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</em> in June 2022. But the efforts by students at southern colleges and universities to gain access to abortion before <em>Roe v. Wade</em> in 1973 made abortion legal went beyond the drama involving the <em>Florida Alligator</em>. College students across the South demanded access to reproductive services on college campuses. Their lively arguments, activities, and personal efforts illustrate the complicated debate over abortion in the South long before <em>Roe</em>. Although women’s liberation groups were part of this process, voicing their desire for the repeal of abortion laws, they were not alone. Indeed, the debate about abortion was less about the organized protest activities regularly associated with student movements of the 1960s. More broadly, students crafted new sexual values focused on responsible and equitable relationships between women and men.<sup>3</sup> Embracing more permissive <strong>[End Page 540]</strong> views on premarital sex and responding to fellow students’ own stories about unwanted pregnancy and abortion, college students on predominantly white campuses across the South argued for reproductive choice and personal freedom, and evidence—from student newspapers to legislative records—indicates they acted on their beliefs. These efforts noted the real consequences of unintended pregnancies on “coeds” and the disparate impact those pregnancies, especially risky illegal abortions, had on women compared with men. Access to safe abortions, in that light, seemed only fair.</p> <p>Unsurprisingly, students’ desire for autonomy and discretion in sexual values alarmed parents, administrators, and state authorities. Indications that college students needed birth control, experienced unintended pregnancies, and sought abortions confirmed to the older generation that college campuses, and their student-run newspapers, had lost their moral compass. Although the conflict over students’ sexual behavior exploded spectacularly in Florida, college trustees and state officials at predominantly white institutions in other southern states also sought ways to limit students’ access to information about birth control and abortion. While students did not necessarily take to the streets, they persistently asserted their right to determine their own values, with considerable success. By 1973, the fear and silence that had surrounded pregnancy and abortion on many southern campuses in the years before <em>Roe v. Wade</em> had been replaced by a new sexual landscape in which premarital sex and reproductive control were accepted aspects of student life, and avenues of access to safe abortion, even before <em>Roe</em>, replaced the risks of illegal abortion.<sup>4</sup></p> <p>Abortion was nothing...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Abortion on Campus: Sexual Liberation and Reproductive Control at Southern Colleges and Universities before 1973
  • Lisa Lindquist Dorr (bio)

On October 6, 1971, Ron Sachs, editor of the University of Florida’s student newspaper, the Florida Alligator, was arrested for violating the state’s 1868 law prohibiting abortion. Sachs had not provided or been involved directly in any abortion himself. Instead, he was charged with violating the section of the law that prohibited the dissemination of any information that could lead to abortion.1 Against the advice of the president and university attorneys, Sachs and his editorial team had published a list of abortion referral and counseling services in the October 6 edition of the Alligator. These services counseled women with unwanted pregnancies and provided information on competent abortion providers. Florida students, the editors believed, deserved information about abortion referral services regardless of the law, as debate on campus over the previous few years had made clear. The charges against Sachs ultimately were dismissed, with a ruling that Florida’s abortion law violated women’s privacy and that the prohibition on information was a violation of free speech rights. Two months later, in February 1972, the Florida Supreme Court concurred, throwing out [End Page 539] Florida’s 1868 law entirely.2 As a result, college newspapers in Florida were free to publish information about where women could seek safe abortions. Student newspapers nationwide celebrated Sachs’s victory, as did several major newspapers in the state and around the country. The University of Florida even went a step further, providing its own on- campus referral service through the Student Government Association, recognizing Florida students’ interest in the procedure.

The story of Sachs’s victory for abortion rights has been resurrected recently in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in June 2022. But the efforts by students at southern colleges and universities to gain access to abortion before Roe v. Wade in 1973 made abortion legal went beyond the drama involving the Florida Alligator. College students across the South demanded access to reproductive services on college campuses. Their lively arguments, activities, and personal efforts illustrate the complicated debate over abortion in the South long before Roe. Although women’s liberation groups were part of this process, voicing their desire for the repeal of abortion laws, they were not alone. Indeed, the debate about abortion was less about the organized protest activities regularly associated with student movements of the 1960s. More broadly, students crafted new sexual values focused on responsible and equitable relationships between women and men.3 Embracing more permissive [End Page 540] views on premarital sex and responding to fellow students’ own stories about unwanted pregnancy and abortion, college students on predominantly white campuses across the South argued for reproductive choice and personal freedom, and evidence—from student newspapers to legislative records—indicates they acted on their beliefs. These efforts noted the real consequences of unintended pregnancies on “coeds” and the disparate impact those pregnancies, especially risky illegal abortions, had on women compared with men. Access to safe abortions, in that light, seemed only fair.

Unsurprisingly, students’ desire for autonomy and discretion in sexual values alarmed parents, administrators, and state authorities. Indications that college students needed birth control, experienced unintended pregnancies, and sought abortions confirmed to the older generation that college campuses, and their student-run newspapers, had lost their moral compass. Although the conflict over students’ sexual behavior exploded spectacularly in Florida, college trustees and state officials at predominantly white institutions in other southern states also sought ways to limit students’ access to information about birth control and abortion. While students did not necessarily take to the streets, they persistently asserted their right to determine their own values, with considerable success. By 1973, the fear and silence that had surrounded pregnancy and abortion on many southern campuses in the years before Roe v. Wade had been replaced by a new sexual landscape in which premarital sex and reproductive control were accepted aspects of student life, and avenues of access to safe abortion, even before Roe, replaced the risks of illegal abortion.4

Abortion was nothing...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校园堕胎:1973 年前南方高校的性解放与生殖控制
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 校园堕胎:Lisa Lindquist Dorr (bio) 1971 年 10 月 6 日,佛罗里达大学学生报《佛罗里达鳄鱼报》的编辑 Ron Sachs 因违反该州 1868 年禁止堕胎的法律而被捕。萨克斯本人并未提供或直接参与任何堕胎活动。1 萨克斯和他的编辑团队不顾校长和大学律师的建议,在 10 月 6 日的《短吻鳄报》上刊登了一份堕胎转介和咨询服务清单。这些服务机构为意外怀孕的妇女提供咨询,并提供有关合格堕胎机构的信息。编辑们认为,无论法律如何规定,佛罗里达州的学生都应该了解有关堕胎转介服务的信息,这一点在过去几年的校园辩论中已经很清楚。对萨克斯的指控最终被驳回,判决认为佛罗里达州的堕胎法侵犯了妇女的隐私权,而且禁止提供信息也侵犯了言论自由权。两个月后,即 1972 年 2 月,佛罗里达州最高法院表示同意,完全废除了 [End Page 539] 佛罗里达州的 1868 年法律。2 因此,佛罗里达州的大学报纸可以自由刊登有关妇女可以在哪里寻求安全堕胎的信息。全国的学生报纸都在庆祝萨克斯的胜利,佛罗里达州和全国各地的几家大报也是如此。佛罗里达大学甚至更进一步,认识到佛罗里达学生对堕胎手术的兴趣,通过学生会提供了自己的校内转介服务。最近,在美国最高法院于 2022 年 6 月做出多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的判决后,萨克斯争取堕胎权的故事再次被提起。但是,在 1973 年 "罗伊诉韦德 "案使堕胎合法化之前,南方高校学生为获得堕胎机会所做的努力远不止 "佛罗里达鳄鱼 "一案。整个南方的大学生都要求在大学校园里获得生殖服务。他们生动的争论、活动和个人努力说明了早在《罗伊诉韦德案》之前南方关于堕胎的复杂争论。尽管妇女解放团体参与了这一进程,表达了废除堕胎法的愿望,但她们并不孤单。事实上,关于堕胎的争论与 20 世纪 60 年代学生运动中经常出现的有组织的抗议活动相比并不那么重要。3 由于对婚前性行为持更宽容的 [第 540 页完] 观点,并对同学们自己关于意外怀孕和堕胎的故事做出了回应,南方各地以白人为主的校园中的大学生们主张生育选择和个人自由,从学生报纸到立法记录等证据都表明,他们根据自己的信念采取了行动。这些努力指出了意外怀孕对 "coeds "造成的实际后果,以及这些怀孕,尤其是高风险的非法堕胎,对女性造成的不同于男性的影响。因此,获得安全堕胎的机会似乎才是公平的。不出所料,学生们对性价值观的自主性和随意性的渴望引起了家长、管理者和国家当局的警觉。大学生需要节育、意外怀孕和寻求堕胎的迹象向老一代人证实,大学校园及其学生自办的报纸已经失去了道德指南针。尽管有关学生性行为的冲突在佛罗里达州爆发得轰轰烈烈,但在南部其他州,以白人为主的院校的校董和州政府官员也在想方设法限制学生获取有关节育和堕胎的信息。虽然学生们不一定会走上街头,但他们坚持维护自己决定自身价值观的权利,并取得了相当大的成功。到 1973 年,在 "罗伊诉韦德案 "之前的几年中,围绕着怀孕和堕胎的恐惧和沉默在许多南方校园中被一种新的性景观所取代,在这种景观中,婚前性行为和生殖控制是学生生活中被接受的方面,甚至在 "罗伊案 "之前,获得安全堕胎的途径也取代了非法堕胎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
Faith, Race, and the Lost Cause: Confessions of a Southern Church by Christopher Alan Graham (review) Nothing More Than Freedom: The Failure of Abolition in American Law by Giuliana Perrone (review) A Man of Bad Reputation: The Murder of John Stephens and the Contested Landscape of North Carolina Reconstruction by Drew A. Swanson (review) Ruin and Resilience: Southern Literature and the Environment by Daniel Spoth (review) In the Shadows of the Big House: Twenty-First-Century Antebellum Slave Cabins and Heritage Tourism in Louisiana by Stephen Small (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1