Principles and practices of returning individual research results to participants in large studies of pregnancy and childhood.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae228
Clay Mash, Kimberly A McAllister, Sundania Wonnum, Ashley J Vargas, Gaya Dowling, S Sonia Arteaga, Carol J Blaisdell, Kristina K Hardy, Irene Prabhu Das, Tonse N K Raju, Matthew W Gillman
{"title":"Principles and practices of returning individual research results to participants in large studies of pregnancy and childhood.","authors":"Clay Mash, Kimberly A McAllister, Sundania Wonnum, Ashley J Vargas, Gaya Dowling, S Sonia Arteaga, Carol J Blaisdell, Kristina K Hardy, Irene Prabhu Das, Tonse N K Raju, Matthew W Gillman","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigators conducting human subject research have typically conveyed only clinically actionable results back to individual participants. Shifting scientific culture around viewing participants as partners in research, however, is prompting investigators to consider returning as much data or results as the participant would like, even if they are not clearly actionable. Expanding return of individual results may add value for individual participants and their communities, refine future research questions and methods, build trust, and enhance retention of participants. Yet, gaps remain in understanding the implications of these changes for groups of \"vulnerable\" participants, including pregnant and pediatric participants. Here we present the findings of a National Institutes of Health workshop on returning individual research results, particularly as applicable to pregnant and pediatric participants. Research participants who were panelists at the workshop agreed that they desired to receive their results. Workshop findings and current literature indicate that participants have differing preferences for what results they receive. One way to address the limits of current practice is to develop flexible digital platforms that convey individual results along with researchers' availability to answer questions, and to provide as much information as possible about actionable steps for controlling environmental exposures associated with disease risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"830-836"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigators conducting human subject research have typically conveyed only clinically actionable results back to individual participants. Shifting scientific culture around viewing participants as partners in research, however, is prompting investigators to consider returning as much data or results as the participant would like, even if they are not clearly actionable. Expanding return of individual results may add value for individual participants and their communities, refine future research questions and methods, build trust, and enhance retention of participants. Yet, gaps remain in understanding the implications of these changes for groups of "vulnerable" participants, including pregnant and pediatric participants. Here we present the findings of a National Institutes of Health workshop on returning individual research results, particularly as applicable to pregnant and pediatric participants. Research participants who were panelists at the workshop agreed that they desired to receive their results. Workshop findings and current literature indicate that participants have differing preferences for what results they receive. One way to address the limits of current practice is to develop flexible digital platforms that convey individual results along with researchers' availability to answer questions, and to provide as much information as possible about actionable steps for controlling environmental exposures associated with disease risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将个人研究成果返还给大型妊娠和儿童研究参与者的原则和做法》(Principles and Practices of Returning Individual Research Results to Participants in Large Studies of Pregnancy and Childhood)。
进行人体研究的调查人员通常只将临床上可操作的结果反馈给参与者个人。然而,将参与者视为研究伙伴的科学文化的转变正促使研究人员考虑按照参与者的意愿返还尽可能多的数据或结果,即使这些数据或结果并不具有明确的可操作性。扩大个人结果的返还范围可能会为个人参与者及其社区带来更多价值,完善未来的研究问题和方法,建立信任,并提高参与者的保留率。然而,在了解这些变化对 "弱势 "参与者群体(包括孕妇和儿科参与者)的影响方面仍存在差距。我们介绍了美国国立卫生研究院关于归还个人研究成果的研讨会的研究成果,尤其是适用于孕妇和儿科参与者的研究成果。作为研讨会小组成员的研究参与者一致认为,他们希望收到自己的研究结果。研讨会的结论和目前的文献表明,参与者对收到什么样的结果有着不同的偏好。解决目前做法的局限性的方法之一是开发灵活的数字平台,在传达个人结果的同时,研究人员也可以回答问题,并尽可能多地提供有关控制与疾病风险相关的环境暴露的可行步骤的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the effectiveness of systemic heparin during arteriovenous fistula creation by emulating a target trial. Long-term PM2.5 exposure and peak expiratory flow in middle-aged and older people in China: a quasi-experimental study. Physical activity, fitness, and cardiac autonomic function among adults born postterm. Mediating pathways between neighborhood disadvantage and cardiovascular risk: quasi-experimental evidence from a Danish refugee dispersal policy. The Puerto Rico Young Adults' Stress, Contextual, Behavioral, and Cardiometabolic Risk (PR-OUTLOOK) Study: design and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1