The double barrel Impella exchange: A reliable method for uninterrupted mechanical circulatory support

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.07.009
Jessica S. Clothier MD , Serge Kobsa MD, PhD , Jonathan Praeger MD, Markian Bojko MD, MPH, Mark Barr MD, Sanjeet Patel MD, PhD, Anahat Dhillon MD, Jonathan Cash MD, Raymond Lee MD
{"title":"The double barrel Impella exchange: A reliable method for uninterrupted mechanical circulatory support","authors":"Jessica S. Clothier MD ,&nbsp;Serge Kobsa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Praeger MD,&nbsp;Markian Bojko MD, MPH,&nbsp;Mark Barr MD,&nbsp;Sanjeet Patel MD, PhD,&nbsp;Anahat Dhillon MD,&nbsp;Jonathan Cash MD,&nbsp;Raymond Lee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Classic Impella exchange interrupts flow when the old device is pulled into the aorta before advancing the new device across the aortic valve, threatening circulatory collapse and loss of left ventricular access. In “double barrel,” uninterrupted Impella exchange, the new device is placed into the ventricle alongside the old, where flow is first transitioned completely. Of 31 consecutive patients undergoing this procedure, none experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest, and 96.8% (30/31) had no new aortic insufficiency. One vascular complication ensued following known preoperative iliac injury. One patient suffered nonembolic stroke; another had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Fifty-five percent (17/31) of patients survived, with 22.6% (7/31) recovering, 25.8% (8/31) undergoing transplant, and 6.5% (2/31) transitioning to durable left ventricular assist device. Impella-only survival (83.3%, 10/12) was significantly higher than Impella-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival (36.8%, 7/19; (operating room) OR 14.46, 95% ((confidence interval) CI 1.74-119.93, <em>p</em> = 0.01). We conclude the “double barrel” technique is reliable in device-dependent cardiogenic shock patients, offering significant advantages and minimal risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"43 12","pages":"Pages 2031-2035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105324982401742X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classic Impella exchange interrupts flow when the old device is pulled into the aorta before advancing the new device across the aortic valve, threatening circulatory collapse and loss of left ventricular access. In “double barrel,” uninterrupted Impella exchange, the new device is placed into the ventricle alongside the old, where flow is first transitioned completely. Of 31 consecutive patients undergoing this procedure, none experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest, and 96.8% (30/31) had no new aortic insufficiency. One vascular complication ensued following known preoperative iliac injury. One patient suffered nonembolic stroke; another had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Fifty-five percent (17/31) of patients survived, with 22.6% (7/31) recovering, 25.8% (8/31) undergoing transplant, and 6.5% (2/31) transitioning to durable left ventricular assist device. Impella-only survival (83.3%, 10/12) was significantly higher than Impella-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival (36.8%, 7/19; (operating room) OR 14.46, 95% ((confidence interval) CI 1.74-119.93, p = 0.01). We conclude the “double barrel” technique is reliable in device-dependent cardiogenic shock patients, offering significant advantages and minimal risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双管 Impella 交换器:不间断机械循环支持的可靠方法。
传统的 Impella 交换在将新装置推进主动脉瓣之前将旧装置拉入主动脉时会中断血流,导致循环衰竭和左心室通路丧失。在 "双管 "不间断 Impella 交换中,新装置与旧装置一起放入心室,血流首先在这里完全转换。在连续接受这种手术的 31 名患者中,没有人在术中发生心脏骤停,96.8%(30/31)的患者没有出现新的主动脉瓣关闭不全。术前已知的髂骨损伤引发了一起血管并发症。一名患者发生非栓塞性中风,另一名患者发生蛛网膜下腔出血。55%(17/31)的患者存活,其中 22.6%(7/31)康复,25.8%(8/31)接受移植,6.5%(2/31)转为耐用型 LVAD。纯Impella存活率(83.3%,10/12)显著高于Impella-ECMO存活率(36.8%,7/19)(OR 14.46,95% CI 1.74-119.93,P=0.01)。我们的结论是,"双管 "技术在设备依赖性心源性休克患者中是可靠的,优势明显,风险极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
期刊最新文献
VENOPULMONARY EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORT: AN ELSO REGISTRY ANALYSIS. Randomized Evaluation of Heart Graft Preservation: Comparative Effects of Optimized Static Cold Storage, Hypothermic and Normothermic Machine Perfusion, and Colchicine Pretreatment on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in a porcine model. Radiologist- and computer-based chest imaging quantification at 12 months post transplant correlates with baseline lung allograft dysfunction. Letter to the editor: Impact of right ventricular reserve during exercise on aortic valve opening in patients with a left ventricular assist device. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1