Communication breakdown repair skills: Comparison between deaf and hard-of-hearing, and normal-hearing adolescents.

IF 1.2 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2024.2379122
Sahar Sadati, Reyhane Mohamadi
{"title":"Communication breakdown repair skills: Comparison between deaf and hard-of-hearing, and normal-hearing adolescents.","authors":"Sahar Sadati, Reyhane Mohamadi","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2379122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Communication breakdowns and their repair by deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) and hearing adolescents were examined in conversation with an unfamiliar communication partner.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study compared the number and type of clarification requests and responses to those requests of 16 DHH and 16 normal-hearing adolescents aged 11-16 years, in a 10-minute conversation with an unfamiliar adult. It also analyzed the relationship between speech intelligibility, communication breakdowns, and clarification requests by an unfamiliar adult. the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) was completed by parents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DHH adolescents demonstrated significantly higher usage of nonverbal clarification requests and verbal and nonverbal responses to clarification requests compared to normal-hearing adolescents in conversations with an unfamiliar adult. Furthermore, the subscale scores of the CCC and the speech intelligibility of DHH adolescents were significantly lower than those of normal-hearing adolescents. There were correlations between speech intelligibility and the speech subscale score of the CCC, as well as correlations between the pragmatic composite score of the CCC, the number of communication breakdowns, and the number of clarification requests by an unfamiliar adult.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The adolescents with DHH experienced more communication breakdowns in conversation with an unfamiliar adult and the number of clarification requests made by adults was higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"99-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2379122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Communication breakdowns and their repair by deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) and hearing adolescents were examined in conversation with an unfamiliar communication partner.

Method: This study compared the number and type of clarification requests and responses to those requests of 16 DHH and 16 normal-hearing adolescents aged 11-16 years, in a 10-minute conversation with an unfamiliar adult. It also analyzed the relationship between speech intelligibility, communication breakdowns, and clarification requests by an unfamiliar adult. the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC) was completed by parents.

Results: DHH adolescents demonstrated significantly higher usage of nonverbal clarification requests and verbal and nonverbal responses to clarification requests compared to normal-hearing adolescents in conversations with an unfamiliar adult. Furthermore, the subscale scores of the CCC and the speech intelligibility of DHH adolescents were significantly lower than those of normal-hearing adolescents. There were correlations between speech intelligibility and the speech subscale score of the CCC, as well as correlations between the pragmatic composite score of the CCC, the number of communication breakdowns, and the number of clarification requests by an unfamiliar adult.

Discussion: The adolescents with DHH experienced more communication breakdowns in conversation with an unfamiliar adult and the number of clarification requests made by adults was higher.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交流中断修复技能:聋哑青少年与听力正常青少年的比较。
目的:研究聋人、重听人和听力正常的青少年在与不熟悉的交流伙伴交谈时的交流障碍及其修复情况:研究聋哑青少年和听力正常青少年在与不熟悉的交流伙伴交谈时出现的交流障碍及其修复情况:本研究比较了 16 名 11-16 岁聋哑青少年和 16 名正常听力青少年在与陌生成年人进行 10 分钟对话时提出澄清要求的数量和类型以及对这些要求的回应。研究还分析了言语清晰度、沟通障碍和陌生成人提出的澄清要求之间的关系。家长填写了儿童沟通检查表(CCC):结果:与听力正常的青少年相比,在与陌生成年人的对话中,听力障碍青少年使用非语言澄清请求以及对澄清请求的语言和非语言反应的比例明显更高。此外,DHH 青少年的 CCC 分量表得分和言语理解能力明显低于正常听力青少年。言语清晰度与CCC的言语分量表得分之间存在相关性,CCC的语用综合得分、沟通中断次数和被陌生成人要求澄清的次数之间也存在相关性:讨论:DHH 青少年在与不熟悉的成年人交谈时,交流中断的次数较多,成年人要求澄清的次数也较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
期刊最新文献
Cochlear device explantation in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer irradiation. Clinical significance of the mastoid emissary vein in paediatric Osia implantation. Investigating the association between pre-implantation cognitive performance and one-year post-implantation speech perception outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients using the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status for hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H). Predictive value of automated cognivue cognitive assessment for cochlear implant outcomes - a preliminary study in a private otolaryngology practice. Professional barriers to adult cochlear implantation: a systematic review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1