COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL最新文献

Objectives: As cochlear implant (CI) criteria widen, more candidates with usable residual hearing are being considered for a CI. Unlike children, adults mostly receive only one implant. The aim of this survey was to determine bimodal-hearing and bilateral CI service provision for adults around the world. This survey offers the backdrop against which future clinical practice and service delivery can be considered.

Methods: CI professionals from across the world were invited to participate in an international multicentre survey. The online questionnaire was circulated to CI professionals in 75 countries. There were 64 respondents, representing 25 countries across five world regions.

Results: In this sample, adult CI users most had unilateral CI (74.5%) and only 25.5% were bilateral CI users. Some 54% of unilateral CI users used a hearing aid (HA) in the non-implanted ear. Funding for a second implant or HA was not well supported for adult unilateral CI users, and there was no clear practice guidance for fitting and maintaining the contralateral HA in most regions.

Conclusions: CI professionals recognised the value of fitting contralateral HAs at CI services, with audiology departments and private HA dispensers playing an ongoing role in general maintenance and support.

Background and aims: Studies investigating the relationship between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds have demonstrated uncertainty as to whether initial results can provide an accurate estimation of an infant's functional hearing. This estimation must be accurate if a cochlear implant (CI) is to be considered before behavioural audiometry.This study aims to explore the variance between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds in infants to determine under which conditions electrophysiological results can be used to support a CI recommendation before behavioural audiology.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 63 infants with suspected severe to profound hearing loss, referred to the Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, before 12 months of age. The assessment protocol includes auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, tympanometry, and behavioural audiometry.

Conclusion: For most infants undergoing CI candidacy evaluation, initial electrophysiological thresholds are an accurate reflection of their subsequent behavioural thresholds. An alternative CI candidacy pathway is recommended for infants who show profound sensorineural hearing loss on initial electrophysiological testing, in the absence of middle ear effusion, prematurity, or auditory neuropathy features, to provide CI recommendations before behavioural thresholds are obtained. This would lead to reduced delay to implantation and improved oral language outcomes.

Introduction: We report an unusual case of cochlear implant complication and eventual explantation secondary to an allergic reaction to silicone.

Case report: A 62-year-old man who underwent cochlear implantation for asymmetric hearing loss developed an allergic response to the implant within a few weeks of the surgery. This led to subsequent explantation. Patch testing using the various parts of the implant revealed a hypersensitive response to the silicone component of the receiver stimulator. There have only been 6 reported cases of cochlear implant explantation secondary to allergic reactions to cochlear implants. The inflammatory reaction has been to the silicone component of the cochlear implant found in the silicone used in Cochlear America's implants.

Conclusion: Although rare, it's important to be aware of delayed hypersensitivity reactions to the silicone component of a cochlear implant. Attention should be made to associate symptoms such as pruritis, urticaria and loss of hair as symptoms and signs of possible allergic reaction to the implanted component. Steroids may help to alleviate symptoms; however, symptoms have been shown to recur after cessation of steroids. Treatment requires the removal of the device.

Objectives: To investigate the effects of automatic scene classification (SCAN) on speech perception in noise and real-world functional performance in children using cochlear implants (CIs).

Methods: We used a within-subjects repeated measures design in two studies. The first study assessed speech perception in noise with or without SCAN enabled in 25 school-aged children. The second study evaluated functional auditory performance in real life. Parents of 18 children provided ratings using the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/oral Performance of Children (PEACH) questionnaire; and children provided ratings using the Self Evaluation of Listening Function (SELF) questionnaire. Analyses of variance with repeated measures were used to examine the effect of SCAN.

Results: On average, speech perception in noise was significantly better with SCAN enabled (mean SRT: -4.1 dB; SD: 4.0), compared to SCAN disabled (mean SRT: 0.5 dB; SD: 3.5). Children's functional performance in real life was similar between the two device settings.

Conclusion: Automatic auditory scene classification provides significant benefits for speech perception in noise (4.6 dB improvement). On average, there were no perceived detrimental or beneficial effects in real life. These findings support the use of SCAN in CIs for young children.

Objectives: Hearing implants often limit the assessment of magnetic resonance examinations due to susceptibility artefacts. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of artefacts attributed to the Osia®2 implant system in terms of utility in visualizing selected cranial structures.

Methods: A BI300 implant and an OSI200 actuator were implanted into a human cadaver head in the audiologically most favourable position according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Scanning was accomplished using the institutional head and inner ear protocol with a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner with retained and removed implant magnet, extended with T1 and T2 weighted sequences with metal-artefact reduction (MAVRIC SL). Image quality was evaluated by three radiologists.

Results: The Osia®2 produced significant artefacts in most of the series of standard imaging sequences predominantly on the ipsilateral side of the head. The majority of the artefacts were caused by the implant magnet. Even without removing the magnet, MAVRIC SL improved image quality to such an extent that it became comparable with that after magnet removal.

Conclusions: The standard sequences suffer considerable quality loss due to the artefacts, attributed predominantly to the magnetic component. Metal-artefact reduction sequences are effective in obtaining sufficient-to-good quality images without surgical magnet removal.

Objectives: The primary objective was to examine duration of daily cochlear implant (CI) usage at 12 and 24 months post-operatively in single sided deafness (SSD). The secondary objective was to examine factors that could affect CI usage.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with SSD who received CI from January 2015 to March 2020. CI usage was evaluated at 12 and 24 months. Hearing loss duration, tinnitus scores and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were correlated with CI usage at 12 months.

Results: Usage data was available for 54 patients at 12 months and 38 patients at 24 months. The mean usage was 8.2 h/day (SD 4.2) at 12 months, 7.0 h/day (SD 5.1) at 24 months. 5 out of 54 (9.3%) and 7 out of 38 patients (18.4%) were non-users at 12 and 24 months post-operatively. An improved mean SNR score from pre-operative 4.4 dB (SD 2.8) to - 0.70 dB (SD 4.2) at 12 months post-operative was positively correlated with CI usage at 12 and 24 months. Hearing loss duration and tinnitus scores were not associated with CI usage.

Conclusions: 18.4% of our patients were non-users at 24 months. Mean usage at 24 months was 7.0 h/day. Improved hearing in noise at 12 months was correlated with better usage.

Objectives: The aim was to construct validity and reliability of the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index Questionnaire (HISQUI19) in Turkish.

Methods: This study was a methodologic study to validate HISQUI19 in Turkish. The study included 62 cochlear implant users. Guttman's split half-coefficient and Cronbach's alpha tests were used for construct validity and internal consistency. Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship of the HISQUI19 total score to the SSQ49 scales for CI users and to show test - retest reliability.

Results: The Cronbach's α value was 0.94 overall score with high internal consistency (Guttman's split-half-coefficient: 0.912). Test-retest reliability results showed high repeatability and consistency of the measure across time (r = 0.708; P = 0.002). Support for conducting factor analysis was provided by the KMO test, with a value of 0.876, which is 'great'.

Discussion: Subjective evaluation of cochlear implant users' daily life experiences is a useful tool to reveal the auditory benefits of cochlear implant usage.

Conclusion: Turkish version of the HISQUI19 is a reliable and valid assessment tool for adults with CIs. This questionnaire provides clinicians with a valuable, reliable, and valid tool for determining the subjective benefit of CI for patients.

Objective: To describe and evaluate a modified cochlear implant surgical procedure for patients with a thick musculocutaneous flap.

Materials and methods: A prospective study for cochlear implant surgery in selected patients with a musculocutaneous flap thicker than 7 mm.

Results: Fourteen patients with a thick scalp flap underwent cochlear implantation between July 2019 and December 2020. The patient age ranged between 17 and 53 years. The flap thickness was between 7 mm and 14 mm. The mean follow uptime post operatively was 16.5 months. The cochlear implant receiver coil was successfully implanted using the transmuscular technique without complications and with normal audiological function.

Conclusion: The transmuscular pocket modified technique is a safe and effective method to overcome a thick musculocutaneous flap in cochlear implant surgery.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the rate of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.

Methods: The review was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies psychophysically measured taste. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models were used. An overall mean from studies reporting a single mean of taste strip performance was calculated using inverse variance method for pooling.

Results: Of 380 studies identified, 9 were included across which 55 cases of postoperative taste disturbance were reported in 498 patients. Taste was tested at variable timepoints, from <1 week to ≥6 months postoperatively. The overall rate of postoperative taste disturbance was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.6-20.7%) with high heterogeneity between studies (I²= 62%).

Discussion: 13.5% might indicate a higher prevalence of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation compared to the general population. However, the confidence we can assign to our calculated rate is limited by significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Studies reporting mean taste strip scores generally found reduced taste function on the side of the tongue ipsilateral to implantation, but this reduction wasn't statistically significant.

Conclusion: Further research, employing more robust and standardised methodologies, is necessary to accurately ascertain the rate and nature of taste disturbance following cochlear implantation.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reading outcomes of a Canadian cohort of school-aged deaf learners with cochlear implants (CIs). The goal was to investigate whether achievement approached that of hearing age peers and identify demographic factors influencing performance.

Methods: Participants represent a subset of 13 students with CIs from a larger sample of 70 deaf students in grades four through 12 educated in inclusive settings within a large school board in central Canada. Data sources included demographic information, teachers' ratings on the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), and scores from the Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery [WJ III-DRB].Results/Discussion: Participants performed within the low average range in all areas except for Phonological Awareness, which was in the low range; however, there was wide variability in scores across participants. None of the demographic variables (e.g. home language, additional disabilities) had a statistically significant association with performance, although older students had higher mean scores on the Phonological Awareness cluster.

Conclusion: These findings add to the body of research on literacy achievement and cochlear implantation, providing evidence that this technology has a significant positive effect on outcomes for a population that has heretofore underperformed in this area.