Objectives: We had two sets of objectives. First, to assess the effects of an online music program on the expressive vocabulary of children with cochlear implants (CIs) and on maternal stress. Second, to explore associations between children's vocabulary, maternal stress, and the quality of children's acoustic environment, measured as daily exposure to speech in quiet.
Methods: Sixteen children with CIs (M = 17.63 months, SD = 6.39) and their mothers participated weekly in a 12-week online music program (CI-T), and 16 children with CIs (M = 18.46 months, SD = 6.02) and their mothers served as controls (CI-C). The program started three months after CI activation. Both groups were assessed at three (T1), six (T2), and twelve (T3) months after CI activation. We collected measures of children's vocabulary (using the MacArthur-Bates Cognitive Development Inventories; MB-CDI), maternal stress (using the Parenting Stress Index; PSI), and children's daily exposure to speech in quiet (from the datalogging of children's devices). Friedman non-parametric tests examined within-group differences in children's vocabulary and in mothers' stress across time points. Spearman correlations (both groups combined) explored associations between changes in vocabulary, maternal stress, and the datalogging at T1, T2, and T3.
Results: The CI-T group showed significant vocabulary gains between T1 and T2, and between T2 and T3 [χ²(2) = 20.5, p < .001]. The CI-C group significantly improved only between T2 and T3 [χ²(2) = 19.60, p < .001]. Maternal stress decreased significantly in the CI-T group between T1 and T2 [χ²(2) = 8.22, p = .02], but not in the CI-C group (all ps > .05). In both groups, we found significant associations between increases in children's expressive vocabulary and maternal stress (e.g. between children's vocabulary increases between T1 and T2, and mothers' scores on the 'Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction' subscale at T1; r = -.40, p = .03); between increases in children's expressive vocabulary and daily exposure to speech in quiet (e.g. between children's vocabulary increases between T1 and T2 and the datalogging 'Speech' scene at T2; r = .47, p = .03); and between maternal stress and daily exposure to speech in quiet (e.g. between mothers' scores on the 'Parent Distress' subscale at T2 and the datalogging 'Speech' scene at T2; r = -.56, p = .01).
Conclusions: Online music-based interventions could benefit children with CIs and their mothers, alongside longer exposure to speech in quiet.
目标:我们有两套目标。首先,评估在线音乐节目对植入人工耳蜗(CIs)儿童表达性词汇的影响以及对母亲压力的影响。其次,探讨儿童词汇量、母亲压力和儿童声环境质量之间的联系,以每天在安静环境中接触语音为衡量标准。方法:16例CIs患儿(M = 17.63个月,SD = 6.39)及其母亲每周参加为期12周的在线音乐课程(CI-T), 16例CIs患儿(M = 18.46个月,SD = 6.02)及其母亲作为对照组(CI-C)。该项目在CI激活后3个月开始。两组在CI激活后3个月(T1)、6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)进行评估。我们收集了儿童词汇量(使用麦克阿瑟-贝茨认知发展量表;MB-CDI)、母亲压力(使用育儿压力指数;PSI)和儿童每天在安静环境下的言语暴露(来自儿童设备的数据记录)的测量数据。弗里德曼非参数测试检验了儿童词汇量和母亲压力在不同时间点上的组内差异。Spearman相关性(两组结合)探讨了词汇变化、母亲压力和T1、T2和T3数据记录之间的联系。结果:CI-T组在T1和T2之间、T2和T3之间有显著的词汇量增加[χ 2 (2) = 20.5, p p p =。[02],但CI-C组无(均为ps >.05)。在两组中,我们发现儿童表达词汇量的增加与母亲压力之间存在显著关联(例如,儿童词汇量在T1和T2之间的增加与母亲在T1的“亲子功能失调互动”子量表上的得分之间存在显著关联;r = - 0.40, p = .03);儿童表达性词汇量的增加与安静中日常言语接触之间的关系(例如,儿童在T1和T2之间的词汇量增加与在T2记录“言语”场景之间的关系;r =。47, p = .03);以及母亲压力与日常安静言语暴露之间的关系(例如,在T2时母亲在“父母痛苦”子量表上的得分与T2时记录“言语”场景的得分之间的关系;r = - 0.56, p = 0.01)。结论:基于在线音乐的干预可以使患有CIs的儿童和他们的母亲受益,同时也可以使他们长时间接触安静的语言。
{"title":"The effect of an online music program on children with cochlear implants' vocabulary, and maternal stress, and the role of the acoustic environment.","authors":"Michela Santangelo, Chiara Barachetti, Letizia Guerzoni, Domenico Cuda, Marinella Majorano","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2026.2620276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2026.2620276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We had two sets of objectives. First, to assess the effects of an online music program on the expressive vocabulary of children with cochlear implants (CIs) and on maternal stress. Second, to explore associations between children's vocabulary, maternal stress, and the quality of children's acoustic environment, measured as daily exposure to speech in quiet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen children with CIs (<i>M</i> = 17.63 months, <i>SD</i> = 6.39) and their mothers participated weekly in a 12-week online music program (CI-T), and 16 children with CIs (<i>M</i> = 18.46 months, <i>SD</i> = 6.02) and their mothers served as controls (CI-C). The program started three months after CI activation. Both groups were assessed at three (T1), six (T2), and twelve (T3) months after CI activation. We collected measures of children's vocabulary (using the MacArthur-Bates Cognitive Development Inventories; MB-CDI), maternal stress (using the Parenting Stress Index; PSI), and children's daily exposure to speech in quiet (from the datalogging of children's devices). Friedman non-parametric tests examined within-group differences in children's vocabulary and in mothers' stress across time points. Spearman correlations (both groups combined) explored associations between changes in vocabulary, maternal stress, and the datalogging at T1, T2, and T3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CI-T group showed significant vocabulary gains between T1 and T2, and between T2 and T3 [χ²(2) = 20.5, <i>p</i> < .001]. The CI-C group significantly improved only between T2 and T3 [χ²(2) = 19.60, <i>p</i> < .001]. Maternal stress decreased significantly in the CI-T group between T1 and T2 [χ²(2) = 8.22, <i>p</i> = .02], but not in the CI-C group (all <i>p</i>s > .05). In both groups, we found significant associations between increases in children's expressive vocabulary and maternal stress (e.g. between children's vocabulary increases between T1 and T2, and mothers' scores on the 'Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction' subscale at T1; <i>r</i> = -.40, <i>p</i> = .03); between increases in children's expressive vocabulary and daily exposure to speech in quiet (e.g. between children's vocabulary increases between T1 and T2 and the datalogging 'Speech' scene at T2; <i>r</i> = .47, <i>p</i> = .03); and between maternal stress and daily exposure to speech in quiet (e.g. between mothers' scores on the 'Parent Distress' subscale at T2 and the datalogging 'Speech' scene at T2; <i>r</i> = -.56, <i>p</i> = .01)<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online music-based interventions could benefit children with CIs and their mothers, alongside longer exposure to speech in quiet.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2026.2622144
Shayan Alvansazyazdi, Razeen Hussain, Jan Margeta, Manuela Chessa, Roger Calixto, Reda Kamraoui, Raabid Hussain, Fabio Solari
Objectives: Cochlear implants (CIs) have revolutionized the treatment of severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, with life-altering outcomes for patients. CI surgery requires the surgeon to delicately place an electrode array in the scala tympani of the cochlea, a procedure that often challenges surgeons due to the absence of visual guidance. In this work, we aim to develop a vision-based tracking strategy to track the movements of the patient and the surgical tools.
Methods: A comprehensive object detection and tracking workflow tailored for temporal bone environments was developed by evaluating the performance of multiple object detection models, which were integrated with a modified BoT-SORT algorithm to enable accurate identification, segmentation, and tracking of surgical tools, electrodes, the surgeon's hands, and the patient's head across frames. The tracking strategy was trained and tested on both in-vivo and ex-vivo datasets.
Results: YOLOv9-based framework achieved the best performance with a mAP50 of 0.788 for detection and 0.762 for segmentation.
Discussion: Our findings highlight the promise of vision-based detection and tracking models in surgical settings, while also underscoring the challenges of translating performance from ex vivo to in vivo environments.
Conclusion: The integrated YOLOv9 and BoT-SORT tracking system maintained stable identity preservation and trajectory consistency, demonstrating strong potential for real-world surgical applications.
{"title":"Vision-based object detection and tracking from surgical microscope video for augmented cochlear implant surgery.","authors":"Shayan Alvansazyazdi, Razeen Hussain, Jan Margeta, Manuela Chessa, Roger Calixto, Reda Kamraoui, Raabid Hussain, Fabio Solari","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2026.2622144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2026.2622144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cochlear implants (CIs) have revolutionized the treatment of severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, with life-altering outcomes for patients. CI surgery requires the surgeon to delicately place an electrode array in the scala tympani of the cochlea, a procedure that often challenges surgeons due to the absence of visual guidance. In this work, we aim to develop a vision-based tracking strategy to track the movements of the patient and the surgical tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive object detection and tracking workflow tailored for temporal bone environments was developed by evaluating the performance of multiple object detection models, which were integrated with a modified BoT-SORT algorithm to enable accurate identification, segmentation, and tracking of surgical tools, electrodes, the surgeon's hands, and the patient's head across frames. The tracking strategy was trained and tested on both in-vivo and ex-vivo datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>YOLOv9-based framework achieved the best performance with a mAP50 of 0.788 for detection and 0.762 for segmentation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the promise of vision-based detection and tracking models in surgical settings, while also underscoring the challenges of translating performance from ex vivo to in vivo environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integrated YOLOv9 and BoT-SORT tracking system maintained stable identity preservation and trajectory consistency, demonstrating strong potential for real-world surgical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146088001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2026.2614862
Lauren R McCray, Pranav A Patel, Erin A Harvey, Theodore R McRackan, Elizabeth L Camposeo, Peter R Dixon
Objectives: To evaluate the perceived utility, challenges, and opportunities for improving a regional telehealth model for cochlear implant (CI) care.
Methods: This qualitative study involved a focus group with five CI audiologists at a tertiary care center. Participants discussed their experiences with a regional telehealth program that used seven satellite sites as part of an ongoing non-inferiority trial. The transcript was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Audiologists identified regional telehealth as beneficial for routine follow-ups, troubleshooting, and reducing travel burden. Visits were shorter and more convenient for patients and providers. Challenges included difficulty communicating with patients who had cognitive or auditory limitations, limited capacity for remote troubleshooting and device handling, and lack of audiometric testing. Site variability in equipment and room acoustics also affected care quality. Participants recommended improving audiovisual infrastructure, standardizing site setups, integrating interpreter and captioning services, and expanding reimbursement. While certain populations posed greater challenges, regional telehealth was viewed as beneficial for mitigating geographic access barriers without the technological requisites for home-based telehealth.
Conclusion: Audiologists perceived regional telehealth as a valuable adjunct to traditional CI care for improving access in underserved areas. Addressing infrastructure and workflow limitations may enhance effectiveness and support broader adoption.
{"title":"Audiologist perspectives on a regional telehealth model for cochlear implant follow-up care: a qualitative study.","authors":"Lauren R McCray, Pranav A Patel, Erin A Harvey, Theodore R McRackan, Elizabeth L Camposeo, Peter R Dixon","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2026.2614862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2026.2614862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the perceived utility, challenges, and opportunities for improving a regional telehealth model for cochlear implant (CI) care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved a focus group with five CI audiologists at a tertiary care center. Participants discussed their experiences with a regional telehealth program that used seven satellite sites as part of an ongoing non-inferiority trial. The transcript was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Audiologists identified regional telehealth as beneficial for routine follow-ups, troubleshooting, and reducing travel burden. Visits were shorter and more convenient for patients and providers. Challenges included difficulty communicating with patients who had cognitive or auditory limitations, limited capacity for remote troubleshooting and device handling, and lack of audiometric testing. Site variability in equipment and room acoustics also affected care quality. Participants recommended improving audiovisual infrastructure, standardizing site setups, integrating interpreter and captioning services, and expanding reimbursement. While certain populations posed greater challenges, regional telehealth was viewed as beneficial for mitigating geographic access barriers without the technological requisites for home-based telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Audiologists perceived regional telehealth as a valuable adjunct to traditional CI care for improving access in underserved areas. Addressing infrastructure and workflow limitations may enhance effectiveness and support broader adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2025.2598103
Barak M Spector, Riley Gilbertson, Jedidiah Grisel, Kimberly Ravelo, Aaron C Moberly
Objectives: Broad variability exists in the outcomes of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. This study assessed performance of adult CI recipients on Cognivue Thrive, a quick, automated cognitive screening device applied in a private Otolaryngology practice, and assessed its ability to predict CI outcomes.
Methods: Thirty-one adults who received CIs between September 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled and tested using Cognivue Thrive before implantation. Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) words and AzBio sentence recognition scores were collected early (1-3 months) and late (6-12 months) after cochlear implantation. .
Results: The group demonstrated poor-to-moderate mean scores relative to normative scores in the Cognivue domains of Memory, Visuospatial, and Executive Function and good performance in Reaction Time and Processing Speed. Controlling for age, the pre-operative Cognivue Memory domain score correlated positively with early post-CI CNC word score (rho = .6, P = .009) and AzBio sentence score (rho = .71, P = .002) with large effect sizes. The pre-operative Visuospatial domain score also correlated with early post-CI AzBio sentence score (rho = .62, P = .01) with large effect size. Correlations between Cognivue scores and late post-CI speech recognition were mostly weaker and non-significant.
Discussion: A pre-operative 5-minute, automated, visual cognitive screening test yields scores that are predictive of short-term adaptation after cochlear implantation but not longer-term speech recognition. A prospective study with larger sample is needed to validate findings. .
Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates proof of concept of applying Cognivue Thrive in a private CI program and its potential to help clinicians and patients to predict CI outcomes.
目的:成人人工耳蜗(CI)受者的预后存在广泛的可变性。本研究评估了成人CI受者在Cognivue Thrive上的表现,Cognivue Thrive是一种用于私人耳鼻喉科实践的快速、自动认知筛查设备,并评估了其预测CI结果的能力。方法:招募了31名在2020年9月至2022年12月期间接受CIs的成年人,并在植入前使用Cognivue Thrive进行了测试。分别于人工耳蜗植入后1-3个月和6-12个月采集辅音核辅音(CNC)单词和AzBio句子识别评分。 。结果:实验组在记忆、视觉空间和执行功能的认知领域表现出较差至中等的平均得分,而在反应时间和处理速度方面表现良好。控制年龄,术前认知记忆领域评分与早期ci后CNC字评分呈正相关(rho =)。6、p =。009)和AzBio句子评分(rho =。71, p =。002)效应量大。术前视觉空间域评分也与早期ci后AzBio句子评分相关(rho =)。62, p =。01)效应量大。认知评分与后期ci后语音识别之间的相关性大多较弱且不显著。讨论:术前5分钟的自动视觉认知筛查测试可以预测人工耳蜗植入后的短期适应,但不能预测长期语音识别。需要更大样本的前瞻性研究来验证研究结果。 。结论:这项初步研究证明了在私人CI项目中应用Cognivue Thrive的概念,以及它帮助临床医生和患者预测CI结果的潜力。
{"title":"Predictive value of automated cognivue cognitive assessment for cochlear implant outcomes - a preliminary study in a private otolaryngology practice.","authors":"Barak M Spector, Riley Gilbertson, Jedidiah Grisel, Kimberly Ravelo, Aaron C Moberly","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2598103","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2598103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Broad variability exists in the outcomes of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. This study assessed performance of adult CI recipients on Cognivue Thrive, a quick, automated cognitive screening device applied in a private Otolaryngology practice, and assessed its ability to predict CI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one adults who received CIs between September 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled and tested using Cognivue Thrive before implantation. Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) words and AzBio sentence recognition scores were collected early (1-3 months) and late (6-12 months) after cochlear implantation. .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group demonstrated poor-to-moderate mean scores relative to normative scores in the Cognivue domains of Memory, Visuospatial, and Executive Function and good performance in Reaction Time and Processing Speed. Controlling for age, the pre-operative Cognivue Memory domain score correlated positively with early post-CI CNC word score (rho = .6, P = .009) and AzBio sentence score (rho = .71, P = .002) with large effect sizes. The pre-operative Visuospatial domain score also correlated with early post-CI AzBio sentence score (rho = .62, P = .01) with large effect size. Correlations between Cognivue scores and late post-CI speech recognition were mostly weaker and non-significant.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A pre-operative 5-minute, automated, visual cognitive screening test yields scores that are predictive of short-term adaptation after cochlear implantation but not longer-term speech recognition. A prospective study with larger sample is needed to validate findings. .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary study demonstrates proof of concept of applying Cognivue Thrive in a private CI program and its potential to help clinicians and patients to predict CI outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"22-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2025.2604428
Michelle Le, Richard B Anderson, Jaime Leigh, Colleen Psarros, Bojana Šarkić
Objectives: Despite the established benefits of cochlear implantation for adults with significant hearing loss, utilisation remains low. Professional and organisational barriers may impede referral for cochlear implants (CIs). This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise professional barriers to adult CI referral within audiological rehabilitation.
Methods: A systematic search of English-language literature was performed from January 1st 1990 to May 16th 2025 using Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, and findings were synthesised descriptively. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024540394).
Results: Four themes were identified as professional barriers to adult cochlear implantation: lack of knowledge and training; concerns and beliefs about CIs and patients; organisational factors; and low prioritisation of hearing loss in healthcare.
Discussion: Limited clinician understanding of CI candidacy criteria and referral pathways was the most frequently reported barrier. Organisational barriers included financial disincentives related to hearing aid sales and inconsistent communication between providers. Non-audiology specialists often perceived hearing loss as a lower-priority condition, contributing to under-referral despite established criteria.
Conclusion: Improving adult CI access requires targeted clinician education, integration of CI education with hearing aids, and reduction of financial disincentives. Future research should explore patient perspectives to identify barriers and inform intervention strategies.
{"title":"Professional barriers to adult cochlear implantation: a systematic review of literature.","authors":"Michelle Le, Richard B Anderson, Jaime Leigh, Colleen Psarros, Bojana Šarkić","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2604428","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2604428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the established benefits of cochlear implantation for adults with significant hearing loss, utilisation remains low. Professional and organisational barriers may impede referral for cochlear implants (CIs). This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise professional barriers to adult CI referral within audiological rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of English-language literature was performed from January 1<sup>st</sup> 1990 to May 16<sup>th</sup> 2025 using Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, and findings were synthesised descriptively. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024540394).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified as professional barriers to adult cochlear implantation: lack of knowledge and training; concerns and beliefs about CIs and patients; organisational factors; and low prioritisation of hearing loss in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Limited clinician understanding of CI candidacy criteria and referral pathways was the most frequently reported barrier. Organisational barriers included financial disincentives related to hearing aid sales and inconsistent communication between providers. Non-audiology specialists often perceived hearing loss as a lower-priority condition, contributing to under-referral despite established criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving adult CI access requires targeted clinician education, integration of CI education with hearing aids, and reduction of financial disincentives. Future research should explore patient perspectives to identify barriers and inform intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2025.2607227
Ralf A Boerboom, Sabine Engels, Fenna A Ebbens, Paul Merkus, Adriana L Smit, Cas Smits
Objective: To present a case series of patients with Chudley - McCullough syndrome (CMS) and provide audiometric outcomes pre - and post - cochlear implantation.
Methods: A retrospective case series was written based on six patients with CMS and hearing loss. Patients were treated in a tertiary-care medical center for their hearing loss with hearing aid fitting and cochlear implantation. Audiometric outcomes pre- and post-cochlear implantation were analyzed.
Results: Three out of six patients were diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), one patient was suspected of ANSD, and in two patients, the presence of ANSD could neither be confirmed nor excluded. All patients were fitted with hearing aids, and all had limited benefit. In most cases, hearing deteriorated rapidly and eventually, all patients received a cochlear implant (CI), unilateral or bilateral. In general, aided thresholds with CIs were satisfactory. However, speech recognition varied widely between patients and was, on average, worse compared to patients with sensorineural hearing loss without CMS.
Conclusions: CMS was often diagnosed relatively late during childhood, and sometimes hearing loss was the first apparent symptom. Hearing loss was found to be progressive, often not detected shortly after birth and often complicated by ANSD. Cochlear implantation emerged as the optimal treatment, demonstrating superiority over hearing aid rehabilitation to improve hearing performance. Auditory and speech-language development outcomes remained poorer than in children with CI and without CMS. Based on these results, we advocate considering cochlear implantation early for children who have CMS and hearing loss.
{"title":"Hearing loss and cochlear implantation in Chudley McCullough syndrome: A case series.","authors":"Ralf A Boerboom, Sabine Engels, Fenna A Ebbens, Paul Merkus, Adriana L Smit, Cas Smits","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2607227","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2607227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a case series of patients with Chudley - McCullough syndrome (CMS) and provide audiometric outcomes pre - and post - cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series was written based on six patients with CMS and hearing loss. Patients were treated in a tertiary-care medical center for their hearing loss with hearing aid fitting and cochlear implantation. Audiometric outcomes pre- and post-cochlear implantation were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three out of six patients were diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), one patient was suspected of ANSD, and in two patients, the presence of ANSD could neither be confirmed nor excluded. All patients were fitted with hearing aids, and all had limited benefit. In most cases, hearing deteriorated rapidly and eventually, all patients received a cochlear implant (CI), unilateral or bilateral. In general, aided thresholds with CIs were satisfactory. However, speech recognition varied widely between patients and was, on average, worse compared to patients with sensorineural hearing loss without CMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMS was often diagnosed relatively late during childhood, and sometimes hearing loss was the first apparent symptom. Hearing loss was found to be progressive, often not detected shortly after birth and often complicated by ANSD. Cochlear implantation emerged as the optimal treatment, demonstrating superiority over hearing aid rehabilitation to improve hearing performance. Auditory and speech-language development outcomes remained poorer than in children with CI and without CMS. Based on these results, we advocate considering cochlear implantation early for children who have CMS and hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"73-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2026.2614844
Emaan Dawood, Arman Saeedi, Daniel H Coelho
Objective: To identify major themes of interest posted by users of the foremost Facebook cochlear implant (CI) support group, understand how these users engage in online support communities, and identify educational gaps in CI care.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective thematic content analysis approach rooted in framework analysis. 536 Facebook posts were gathered over a two-week period in July 2024 from the Cochlear Implant Experiences Facebook group. Posts were analyzed for author, tone, content, and engagement metrics. Posts were inductively coded into more specific themes and subthemes by two coders with any disagreements resolved by consensus discussion.
Results: Majority of posts were authored by patients (81.6%), followed by unknown authors (11.8%), family members (6.2%), companies/vendors (0.2%), and providers (0.2%). The average number of reactions and comments was 22 and 20, respectively. Most posts had a neutral tone (49.6%), followed by a negative tone (28.3%), and positive tone (22.1%). Majority of posts were questions (69%), followed by experience-sharing (21%), and information-sharing posts (10%). Eight major themes were identified from the analysis.
Conclusion: Patients utilize this social media community for various reasons but overwhelmingly utilize it to ask questions related to management of the CI device and related equipment. These findings demonstrate trust among patients to gain information from each other and seek support, providing valuable information for providers and companies to fill educational gaps in CI care.
{"title":"Facebook as a resource for cochlear implant information: a thematic content analysis.","authors":"Emaan Dawood, Arman Saeedi, Daniel H Coelho","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2026.2614844","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2026.2614844","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify major themes of interest posted by users of the foremost Facebook cochlear implant (CI) support group, understand how these users engage in online support communities, and identify educational gaps in CI care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective thematic content analysis approach rooted in framework analysis. 536 Facebook posts were gathered over a two-week period in July 2024 from the Cochlear Implant Experiences Facebook group. Posts were analyzed for author, tone, content, and engagement metrics. Posts were inductively coded into more specific themes and subthemes by two coders with any disagreements resolved by consensus discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Majority of posts were authored by patients (81.6%), followed by unknown authors (11.8%), family members (6.2%), companies/vendors (0.2%), and providers (0.2%). The average number of reactions and comments was 22 and 20, respectively. Most posts had a neutral tone (49.6%), followed by a negative tone (28.3%), and positive tone (22.1%). Majority of posts were questions (69%), followed by experience-sharing (21%), and information-sharing posts (10%). Eight major themes were identified from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients utilize this social media community for various reasons but overwhelmingly utilize it to ask questions related to management of the CI device and related equipment. These findings demonstrate trust among patients to gain information from each other and seek support, providing valuable information for providers and companies to fill educational gaps in CI care.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"63-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2025.2602323
Kuan-Wu Kuo, Ting-Hui Liu, Chia-Yu Liu, Chun-Jung Liu
Importance: Cochlear implants provide a treatment option for adults with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, their long-term impact on mental health were understudied.
Objective: This study explored the long-term effect of cochlear implants on the incidence of psychiatric disorders in adults with bilateral severe to profound SNHL, and examined the subgroup differences in these outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants: Data for this cohort study were analyzed on January 12, 2024, from the TriNetX electronic records database. Adults with bilateral severe to profound SNHL who received a cochlear implant were compared with matched peers who did not.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the combined incidence of anxiety, depression, and insomnia, within one to three-years after baseline. Each psychiatric disorder was examined separately as a secondary outcome.
Results: This study included 8,964 adults in each group. The cochlear implant group demonstrated a significant lower risk of psychiatric disorders compared to the non-implanted group. Reductions were also observed for depression, insomnia, and anxiety, with effects consistent across the follow-up period and subgroups.
Conclusions: Cochlear implantation was associated with a lower long-term incidence of psychiatric disorders among adults with bilateral severe to profound SNHL.
{"title":"Effects of cochlear implants on depression, anxiety, and insomnia in adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a three-year retrospective cohort study of 8964 cochlear implant users.","authors":"Kuan-Wu Kuo, Ting-Hui Liu, Chia-Yu Liu, Chun-Jung Liu","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2602323","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2602323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cochlear implants provide a treatment option for adults with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, their long-term impact on mental health were understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the long-term effect of cochlear implants on the incidence of psychiatric disorders in adults with bilateral severe to profound SNHL, and examined the subgroup differences in these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Data for this cohort study were analyzed on January 12, 2024, from the TriNetX electronic records database. Adults with bilateral severe to profound SNHL who received a cochlear implant were compared with matched peers who did not.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the combined incidence of anxiety, depression, and insomnia, within one to three-years after baseline. Each psychiatric disorder was examined separately as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 8,964 adults in each group. The cochlear implant group demonstrated a significant lower risk of psychiatric disorders compared to the non-implanted group. Reductions were also observed for depression, insomnia, and anxiety, with effects consistent across the follow-up period and subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cochlear implantation was associated with a lower long-term incidence of psychiatric disorders among adults with bilateral severe to profound SNHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"2-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2025.2603013
Ljupcho Fenov, Chris Tsilivigos, Thomas Lenarz, Eugen Kludt, Nils Prenzler
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively assess insertion characteristics, auditory performance, and cochlear implant fitting outcomes in a large cohort of implanted patients with otosclerosis, in comparison with a control group of implanted non-otosclerotic individuals. The most of the otosclerotic patients had retrofenestral otosclerosis and were indicated to cochlear implantation because of deafness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients and intervention: </strong>A group of 49 patients (54 implanted ears) with otosclerosis who received a Cochlear Nucleus 512 or Freedom 24RE between 2009 and 2015 were included, along with a control group of 577 patients (599 implanted ears) with hearing loss due to causes other than otosclerosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, meningitis, head trauma, temporal bone fracture, labyrinthitis, or prior middle ear surgery. All patients were implanted with the same type of electrode.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Audiometric data were collected from routine fitting and re-fitting appointments using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test and the Hochmaier-Schulz-Moser test in 10 dB noise (HSM 10 dB). Electrode impedance values, Neural Response Telemetry (NRT), C-levels, the incidence of facial nerve stimulation, and electrode deactivation during the fitting process were also assessed in both groups. For the otosclerotic patients, postoperative radiologic data included measurements of the electrode insertion angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the otosclerosis group achieved a median score of 50% in the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test by the end of the first fitting week, followed by further improvement within the first year and a plateau at approximately 65%. Five years post-implantation, they achieved a mean score of 40% on the HSM 10 dB test. No statistically significant differences were observed in the audiometric test results between the otosclerosis and control groups. Impedance values in the otosclerosis group were significantly higher than in the control group. In both groups, impedances decreased after the first fitting up to the 3 months appointment, and then remained stable over the following 5 years. No statistically significant differences were observed in NRT or C-levels between the two groups. However, facial nerve stimulation occurred significantly more often in the otosclerosis group, with an incidence of 29%. The median insertion angle in the otosclerosis group was 368°, and a statistically significant positive correlation was found between insertion angle and Freiburg test scores, as determined by Pearson correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite challenging anatomical conditions and increased postoperative impedances, there are no differences in audiological performance between patients undergoing cochlear implantation with compared to
目的:综合评估植入耳蜗的耳硬化患者的植入特征、听觉表现和人工耳蜗拟合结果,并与对照组植入耳蜗的非耳硬化个体进行比较。耳硬化患者多为耳门后耳硬化,因耳聋需行人工耳蜗植入术。研究设计:回顾性观察队列研究。单位:三级转诊中心。患者和干预措施:在2009年至2015年期间,49名耳硬化患者(54只植入耳)接受了512或Freedom 24RE耳蜗,以及577名对照组患者(599只植入耳),这些患者的听力损失是由于耳硬化、成骨不全、脑膜炎、脑外伤、颞骨骨折、迷路炎或先前的中耳手术以外的原因造成的。所有患者均植入相同类型的电极。主要结果测量:听力测量数据收集自常规拟合和重新拟合,采用Freiburg单音节测试和Hochmaier-Schulz-Moser测试,噪音为10 dB (HSM 10 dB)。在拟合过程中,对两组的电极阻抗值、神经反应遥测(NRT)、c水平、面神经刺激发生率和电极失活进行评估。对于耳硬化患者,术后放射学数据包括电极插入角度的测量。结果:耳硬化组患者在第一个拟合周结束时在Freiburg单音节测试中获得50%的中位分数,随后在第一年内进一步改善,并在约65%的平台期。植入5年后,他们在HSM 10db测试中平均得分为40%。耳硬化症组与对照组的听力测试结果无统计学差异。耳硬化组阻抗值明显高于对照组。在两组中,阻抗在第一次拟合后下降,直到3个月的预约,然后在接下来的5年保持稳定。两组间NRT和c水平无统计学差异。然而,面神经刺激在耳硬化组发生的频率明显更高,发生率为29%。耳硬化组中位插入角为368°,经Pearson相关分析,插入角与Freiburg测试成绩呈正相关,有统计学意义。结论:尽管解剖条件具有挑战性,术后阻抗增加,但人工耳蜗植入患者的听力学性能与未患耳硬化的患者没有差异。耳硬化症患者明显更容易受到面神经刺激。然而,在电极总体失活和术后拟合参数方面,与对照组相比没有进一步的差异。
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: radiological, technical, and audiological outcomes over five years.","authors":"Ljupcho Fenov, Chris Tsilivigos, Thomas Lenarz, Eugen Kludt, Nils Prenzler","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2603013","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2603013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively assess insertion characteristics, auditory performance, and cochlear implant fitting outcomes in a large cohort of implanted patients with otosclerosis, in comparison with a control group of implanted non-otosclerotic individuals. The most of the otosclerotic patients had retrofenestral otosclerosis and were indicated to cochlear implantation because of deafness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients and intervention: </strong>A group of 49 patients (54 implanted ears) with otosclerosis who received a Cochlear Nucleus 512 or Freedom 24RE between 2009 and 2015 were included, along with a control group of 577 patients (599 implanted ears) with hearing loss due to causes other than otosclerosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, meningitis, head trauma, temporal bone fracture, labyrinthitis, or prior middle ear surgery. All patients were implanted with the same type of electrode.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Audiometric data were collected from routine fitting and re-fitting appointments using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test and the Hochmaier-Schulz-Moser test in 10 dB noise (HSM 10 dB). Electrode impedance values, Neural Response Telemetry (NRT), C-levels, the incidence of facial nerve stimulation, and electrode deactivation during the fitting process were also assessed in both groups. For the otosclerotic patients, postoperative radiologic data included measurements of the electrode insertion angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the otosclerosis group achieved a median score of 50% in the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test by the end of the first fitting week, followed by further improvement within the first year and a plateau at approximately 65%. Five years post-implantation, they achieved a mean score of 40% on the HSM 10 dB test. No statistically significant differences were observed in the audiometric test results between the otosclerosis and control groups. Impedance values in the otosclerosis group were significantly higher than in the control group. In both groups, impedances decreased after the first fitting up to the 3 months appointment, and then remained stable over the following 5 years. No statistically significant differences were observed in NRT or C-levels between the two groups. However, facial nerve stimulation occurred significantly more often in the otosclerosis group, with an incidence of 29%. The median insertion angle in the otosclerosis group was 368°, and a statistically significant positive correlation was found between insertion angle and Freiburg test scores, as determined by Pearson correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite challenging anatomical conditions and increased postoperative impedances, there are no differences in audiological performance between patients undergoing cochlear implantation with compared to","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"44-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2025.2601419
Loes Beckers, Hugo Nijmeijer, Emmanuel Mylanus, Wendy Huinck
Objectives: This study investigates whether pre-implantation cognitive function, assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing Impaired Individuals (RBANS-H) correlates with speech perception oneyear post-implantation, and whether it can serve as a factor explaining unexpected outcome variability in adult Cochlear implant (CI) recipients.
Methods: This prospective longitudinal study involved 68 postlingually deaf CI recipients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05525221). RBANS-H assesses five cognitive domains: Immediate Memory (List Learning and Story Memory), Visuospatial/Constructional (Figure Copy, Line Orientation), Language (Picture Naming, Semantic Fluency), Attention (Digit Span, Coding) and Delayed Memory (List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall, Figure Recall). RBANS-H and vocabulary tests were conducted pre-implantation. Phoneme scores were derived using Dutch consonant-vowel-consonant words-in-quiet, collected oneyear post-implantation in best-aided condition.
Results: Moderate positive correlations were observed for Coding (r = 0.43, p = 0.007), List Learning (r = 0.39, = 0.015), Story Recall (r = 0.43, p = 0.019), and Story Memory (r = 0.34, p = 0.030). No significant relationships were found for other tasks, domains, total scores or the vocabulary tests.
Discussion: Correlations of Coding, Immediate Memory and Delayed Memory tasks with speech outcomes highlight the involvement of attention and memory in perceiving speech with CI or acquiring this ability.
Conclusion: RBANS-H as a battery may not be sensitive enough to predict outcomes, suggesting the need for a tailored test battery that covers relevant cognitive functions and is sensitive to the specific needs of CI users.
目的:本研究探讨人工耳蜗植入前的认知功能是否与植入一年后的言语感知相关,以及它是否可以作为解释成人人工耳蜗(CI)受者意外结果变异性的一个因素。方法:本前瞻性纵向研究纳入68名语后失聪CI受者(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05525221)。RBANS-H评估五个认知领域:即时记忆(列表学习和故事记忆),视觉空间/结构(图形复制,线条方向),语言(图片命名,语义流畅性),注意力(数字广度,编码)和延迟记忆(列表回忆,列表识别,故事回忆,图形回忆)。植入前进行rban - h和词汇测试。音素评分采用荷兰语辅音-元音-辅音单词-in-quiet,在最佳辅助条件下植入一年后收集。结果:编码(r = 0.43, p = 0.007)、列表学习(r = 0.39, = 0.015)、故事回忆(r = 0.43, p = 0.019)、故事记忆(r = 0.34, p = 0.030)的学习成绩呈中等正相关。在其他任务、领域、总分或词汇测试中没有发现显著的关系。讨论:编码、即时记忆和延迟记忆任务与语音结果的相关性突出了注意和记忆在CI感知语音或获得这种能力中的参与。结论:rban - h作为一种电池可能不够敏感,无法预测结果,这表明需要定制一种涵盖相关认知功能的测试电池,并对CI用户的特定需求敏感。
{"title":"Investigating the association between pre-implantation cognitive performance and one-year post-implantation speech perception outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients using the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status for hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H).","authors":"Loes Beckers, Hugo Nijmeijer, Emmanuel Mylanus, Wendy Huinck","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2601419","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2601419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates whether pre-implantation cognitive function, assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing Impaired Individuals (RBANS-H) correlates with speech perception oneyear post-implantation, and whether it can serve as a factor explaining unexpected outcome variability in adult Cochlear implant (CI) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective longitudinal study involved 68 postlingually deaf CI recipients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05525221<b>)</b>. RBANS-H assesses five cognitive domains: <i>Immediate Memory (List Learning and Story Memory</i>), <i>Visuospatial/Constructional (Figure Copy, Line Orientation</i>), <i>Language (Picture Naming, Semantic Fluency</i>), <i>Attention (Digit Span, Coding</i>) and <i>Delayed Memory (List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall, Figure Recall</i>). RBANS-H and vocabulary tests were conducted pre-implantation. Phoneme scores were derived using Dutch consonant-vowel-consonant words-in-quiet, collected oneyear post-implantation in best-aided condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate positive correlations were observed for <i>Coding</i> (<i>r</i> = 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.007), <i>List Learning</i> (<i>r</i> = 0.39, = 0.015), <i>Story Recall</i> (<i>r</i> = 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.019), and <i>Story Memory</i> (<i>r</i> = 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.030). No significant relationships were found for other tasks, domains, total scores or the vocabulary tests.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Correlations of <i>Coding</i>, <i>Immediate Memory</i> and <i>Delayed Memory</i> tasks with speech outcomes highlight the involvement of attention and memory in perceiving speech with CI or acquiring this ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBANS-H as a battery may not be sensitive enough to predict outcomes, suggesting the need for a tailored test battery that covers relevant cognitive functions and is sensitive to the specific needs of CI users.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"32-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}