Eco-efficiency in the agricultural landscape of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104062
Stefan Seifert , Saskia Wolff , Silke Hüttel
{"title":"Eco-efficiency in the agricultural landscape of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany","authors":"Stefan Seifert ,&nbsp;Saskia Wolff ,&nbsp;Silke Hüttel","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Intensified agricultural production systems relying on larger field sizes and homogeneous landscapes result in land degradation, biodiversity losses, and impaired ecosystem services, particularly regulating services such as water and climate regulation. A multifunctional landscape composition and configuration promises higher ecosystem functionality by balancing ecological and economic provisioning functionality for food, fuel, and fiber. However, to the best of our knowledge, not much is known about the synergies and trade-offs of different landscape compositions and configurations and landscape designs providing ecosystem functionality in economic and ecological dimensions.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>We addressed the question whether the ecosystem functionality of agricultural landscapes can be improved at given levels of economic valuation. We quantified potential improvements of ecosystem functionality through multifunctional landscape composition and configuration. We identified agricultural landscapes that provide high ecosystem functionality at their level of economic valuation, given that such regions may serve as role models for a target landscape composition.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Using an eco-efficiency approach based on the non-parametric order<em>-m</em> estimator, we quantified potential improvements of ecosystem functionality at the agricultural landscapes scale. We used the 20 km<sup>2</sup> hexagonal grid level in the Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. We described landscape composition and configuration using spatially explicit land cover data from the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS); land value data indicated the economic output of the landscape. We investigated robustness of our results under different grid specifications (10–50 km<sup>2</sup>) and using subsamples of regions with similar environmental conditions.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>We found on average high eco-efficiency of agricultural landscapes in the study region. We also found notable improvement potentials in at least one ecological indicator that were spatially clustered. The results suggest the potential for Pareto improvements, i.e., increasing landscape eco-efficiency without sacrificing economic outputs.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>We present a novel empirical approach to evaluate the eco-efficiency of agricultural landscapes and investigate spatial patterns of eco-efficiency at the landscape scale. We modeled landscapes' potential multifunctionality at a fine regional scale using indicators for landscape composition and configuration based on spatially explicit and highly granular land use and land management data. We relied on publicly available data, and our approach can serve to develop monitoring or policy evaluation at the landscape scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104062"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002129/pdfft?md5=c2c4557572656a5ff7599d68ca62cbe9&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002129-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Intensified agricultural production systems relying on larger field sizes and homogeneous landscapes result in land degradation, biodiversity losses, and impaired ecosystem services, particularly regulating services such as water and climate regulation. A multifunctional landscape composition and configuration promises higher ecosystem functionality by balancing ecological and economic provisioning functionality for food, fuel, and fiber. However, to the best of our knowledge, not much is known about the synergies and trade-offs of different landscape compositions and configurations and landscape designs providing ecosystem functionality in economic and ecological dimensions.

OBJECTIVE

We addressed the question whether the ecosystem functionality of agricultural landscapes can be improved at given levels of economic valuation. We quantified potential improvements of ecosystem functionality through multifunctional landscape composition and configuration. We identified agricultural landscapes that provide high ecosystem functionality at their level of economic valuation, given that such regions may serve as role models for a target landscape composition.

METHODS

Using an eco-efficiency approach based on the non-parametric order-m estimator, we quantified potential improvements of ecosystem functionality at the agricultural landscapes scale. We used the 20 km2 hexagonal grid level in the Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. We described landscape composition and configuration using spatially explicit land cover data from the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS); land value data indicated the economic output of the landscape. We investigated robustness of our results under different grid specifications (10–50 km2) and using subsamples of regions with similar environmental conditions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We found on average high eco-efficiency of agricultural landscapes in the study region. We also found notable improvement potentials in at least one ecological indicator that were spatially clustered. The results suggest the potential for Pareto improvements, i.e., increasing landscape eco-efficiency without sacrificing economic outputs.

SIGNIFICANCE

We present a novel empirical approach to evaluate the eco-efficiency of agricultural landscapes and investigate spatial patterns of eco-efficiency at the landscape scale. We modeled landscapes' potential multifunctionality at a fine regional scale using indicators for landscape composition and configuration based on spatially explicit and highly granular land use and land management data. We relied on publicly available data, and our approach can serve to develop monitoring or policy evaluation at the landscape scale.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州农业景观的生态效益
内容提要依赖于更大的田地面积和单一景观的强化农业生产系统会导致土地退化、生物多样性丧失和生态系统服务受损,特别是水和气候调节等调节服务。多功能景观的组成和配置通过平衡粮食、燃料和纤维的生态和经济供应功能,有望实现更高的生态系统功能。然而,据我们所知,人们对不同景观组成和配置以及景观设计在经济和生态方面提供生态系统功能的协同作用和权衡还知之甚少。我们量化了通过多功能景观组成和配置提高生态系统功能的潜力。我们确定了在其经济估值水平上具有较高生态系统功能的农业景观,因为这些区域可作为目标景观组成的榜样。方法我们采用基于非参数阶m估算器的生态效率方法,量化了农业景观尺度上生态系统功能的潜在改善。我们在德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州使用了 20 平方公里的六边形网格。我们使用综合管理和控制系统(IACS)中的空间显式土地覆被数据描述了景观的组成和配置;土地价值数据显示了景观的经济产出。我们研究了不同网格规格(10-50 平方公里)下结果的稳健性,并使用了具有相似环境条件的地区子样本。我们还发现,至少有一项生态指标具有明显的改善潜力,而且这些指标在空间上呈集群分布。这些结果表明了帕累托改进的潜力,即在不牺牲经济产出的情况下提高景观生态效益。意义我们提出了一种新颖的实证方法来评估农业景观的生态效益,并研究景观尺度上生态效益的空间模式。我们利用基于空间明确且高度细化的土地利用和土地管理数据的景观组成和配置指标,在精细的区域尺度上模拟了景观的潜在多功能性。我们依赖于公开可用的数据,我们的方法可用于在景观尺度上开展监测或政策评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Lowering the greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from grassland-based dairy production The dairy production system in the north of Sweden under possible future food scenarios A pathway for decreasing the water footprint from grazing-based beef production systems in the Tropics How to use residual biomass streams in circular food systems to minimise land use or GHG emissions Win-win or lose-win? Economic-climatic synergies and trade-offs in dual-purpose cattle systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1