Unlocking the role of shared dockless e-scooters bridging last-mile gaps: A quasi-experimental study of metro rail transit in Los Angeles

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100869
{"title":"Unlocking the role of shared dockless e-scooters bridging last-mile gaps: A quasi-experimental study of metro rail transit in Los Angeles","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One major challenge of a public transit system is first- and last-mile (FLM) connectivity. With the advent of smart technology and on-demand transportation services, shared micromobility is believed to provide a low-cost solution for bridging the first- and last-mile gap. However, several studies have arrived at mixed conclusions about the FLM achieved by shared mircomobility. This study explores the causal effect of shared dockless e-scooters on last-mile connectivity to public transit by controlling confounding variables, including built environment and socioeconomic status. The study employs a quasi-experimental design. This study defines last-mile connectivity, here, treatment effect, if e-scooter service areas near rail stations increase metro rail ridership after the introduction of e-scooter service. After matching pairs between treatment and control groups using propensity score matching, we use difference-in-difference regression to examine the causal relationship between shared dockless e-scooter service and ridership changes in public rail transit before and after e-scooter service. The findings indicate that the treatment effect, a higher e-scooter trip density around transit buffer areas, positively impacts monthly rail ridership. In conclusion, planning and transportation agencies can develop street design guidelines or transit-oriented development to encourage the active and safe use of e-scooters, thereby promoting better integration of shared dockless e-scooters with transit systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One major challenge of a public transit system is first- and last-mile (FLM) connectivity. With the advent of smart technology and on-demand transportation services, shared micromobility is believed to provide a low-cost solution for bridging the first- and last-mile gap. However, several studies have arrived at mixed conclusions about the FLM achieved by shared mircomobility. This study explores the causal effect of shared dockless e-scooters on last-mile connectivity to public transit by controlling confounding variables, including built environment and socioeconomic status. The study employs a quasi-experimental design. This study defines last-mile connectivity, here, treatment effect, if e-scooter service areas near rail stations increase metro rail ridership after the introduction of e-scooter service. After matching pairs between treatment and control groups using propensity score matching, we use difference-in-difference regression to examine the causal relationship between shared dockless e-scooter service and ridership changes in public rail transit before and after e-scooter service. The findings indicate that the treatment effect, a higher e-scooter trip density around transit buffer areas, positively impacts monthly rail ridership. In conclusion, planning and transportation agencies can develop street design guidelines or transit-oriented development to encourage the active and safe use of e-scooters, thereby promoting better integration of shared dockless e-scooters with transit systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示共享无桩电动滑板车在弥合最后一英里差距方面的作用:洛杉矶地铁轨道交通准实验研究
公共交通系统面临的一大挑战是 "最初一英里 "和 "最后一英里"(FLM)的连接。随着智能技术和按需运输服务的出现,共享微型交通被认为是缩小首末里差距的低成本解决方案。然而,多项研究对共享微型交通所实现的 "最后一英里"(FLM)得出的结论不一。本研究通过控制建筑环境和社会经济状况等混杂变量,探讨了共享无桩电动滑板车对最后一英里公共交通连接的因果效应。研究采用了准实验设计。如果在引入电动滑板车服务后,地铁站附近的电动滑板车服务区增加了地铁乘客数量,则本研究将其定义为 "最后一英里连通性",即治疗效果。在使用倾向得分匹配法对治疗组和对照组进行配对后,我们使用差分回归法考察了共享无桩电动滑板车服务与电动滑板车服务前后公共轨道交通乘客量变化之间的因果关系。研究结果表明,处理效应--公交缓冲区周围更高的电动滑板车出行密度--对每月的轨道交通乘客量产生了积极影响。总之,规划和交通机构可以制定街道设计指南或公交导向开发,以鼓励积极、安全地使用电动滑板车,从而促进无桩共享电动滑板车与公交系统更好地融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Activity spaces and leisure travel emissions: A case study in Reykjavík, Iceland Investigating spatial-temporal characteristics of joint activity/travel behaviour with smart card data Influence of childhood experiences on walking behavior during adulthood: Long-term panel data analysis Understanding factors associated with individuals’ non-mandatory activities using machine learning and SHAP interpretation: A case study of Guangzhou, China Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected travellers’ willingness to wait with real-time crowding information?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1