Does rumination moderate the effect of attention bias modification for depressive symptoms?

Hallvard Solbø Hagen , Jan Ivar Røssberg , Catherine J. Harmer , Rune Jonassen , Nils Inge Landrø , Ragnhild Bø
{"title":"Does rumination moderate the effect of attention bias modification for depressive symptoms?","authors":"Hallvard Solbø Hagen ,&nbsp;Jan Ivar Røssberg ,&nbsp;Catherine J. Harmer ,&nbsp;Rune Jonassen ,&nbsp;Nils Inge Landrø ,&nbsp;Ragnhild Bø","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current treatment of major depressive disorders still leave many patients with modest improvement. Attention Bias Modification (ABM) is an approach that may serve as an adjuvant therapy for subgroups of patients. We examined whether rumination, often found to be associated with a negative attentional bias, acts as a moderating variable in a computerized ABM procedure in participants with recurrent depression.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 301 patients were randomized to receive either active - or sham ABM twice daily for 14 days. A regression-based moderator analysis was applied to evaluate whether baseline brooding, from the Rumination Response Scale (RRS-B), moderated the effect of ABM on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant interaction effect of ABM and RRS-B on HDRS or BDI-II at post-intervention or at 1 month follow-up. In addition, no correlation was found for pre-training attention bias and RRS-B.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>: Generalizability is limited to individuals with non-clinical symptom scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no moderator effect of brooding rumination on clinical depression scales in the largest clinical study on ABM to date.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100824"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001100/pdfft?md5=17a4920815c7020da000255706817046&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001100-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Current treatment of major depressive disorders still leave many patients with modest improvement. Attention Bias Modification (ABM) is an approach that may serve as an adjuvant therapy for subgroups of patients. We examined whether rumination, often found to be associated with a negative attentional bias, acts as a moderating variable in a computerized ABM procedure in participants with recurrent depression.

Methods

A total of 301 patients were randomized to receive either active - or sham ABM twice daily for 14 days. A regression-based moderator analysis was applied to evaluate whether baseline brooding, from the Rumination Response Scale (RRS-B), moderated the effect of ABM on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II).

Results

There was no significant interaction effect of ABM and RRS-B on HDRS or BDI-II at post-intervention or at 1 month follow-up. In addition, no correlation was found for pre-training attention bias and RRS-B.

Limitations

: Generalizability is limited to individuals with non-clinical symptom scores.

Conclusions

There was no moderator effect of brooding rumination on clinical depression scales in the largest clinical study on ABM to date.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反刍是否会减缓注意力偏差修正对抑郁症状的影响?
背景目前对重度抑郁障碍的治疗仍使许多患者的病情略有改善。注意力偏差修正(ABM)是一种可作为亚组患者辅助治疗的方法。我们研究了经常被发现与消极注意偏差有关的反刍是否会在复发性抑郁症患者的计算机化 ABM 程序中起到调节变量的作用。结果在干预后或随访 1 个月时,ABM 和 RRS-B 对 HDRS 或 BDI-II 没有显著的交互作用。此外,训练前的注意力偏差与 RRS-B 没有相关性:结论在迄今为止最大规模的 ABM 临床研究中,沉思反刍对临床抑郁量表没有调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum correlate with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach Examining concurrent and longitudinal associations between quality of interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms among young adults in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1