Assessing travelers’ preferences for online bus-hailing service across various travel distances: Insights from Chinese metropolitan areas

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104159
{"title":"Assessing travelers’ preferences for online bus-hailing service across various travel distances: Insights from Chinese metropolitan areas","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study conducts a stated preference survey to assess travelers’ preferences for online bus-hailing service across various travel distances in Chinese metropolitan areas. By collecting personal attributes, travel characteristics, and scenario variables (including fares, walking distance, waiting time, and travel time for various ground transportation services), we develop a travel mode choice model based on XGBoost and examine the positive and negative effects and elasticity of different influencing factors. Empirical results demonstrate that the XGBoost-based travel mode choice model performs best in predictive accuracy, proving its superior fitting capability. Meanwhile, travel distance is pivotal in determining travelers’ preferences. Short-distance travelers prioritize time efficiency, whereas as travel distance increases, travelers become less sensitive to time, and fares become the primary consideration. This shift provides service operators with opportunities to implement differentiated strategies. The remaining travel modes also significantly influence choice preferences, with travelers critically concerned about the time cost of regular bus service and highly sensitive to taxi/car-hailing service fares. Personal attributes and travel characteristics, such as gender, age, and the number of companions, also impact choice preferences, providing opportunities for service operators to offer personalized services. Elasticity analysis further confirms the role of each influencing factor in increasing the attractiveness of choosing online bus-hailing service. Ultimately, we derive significant insights at the planning level, including single-factor optimization and prioritizing optimization for different dual-factor combinations. These insights serve as a basis for urban managers to formulate and enhance online bus-hailing service, covering aspects such as fare incentive policies and route service frequencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study conducts a stated preference survey to assess travelers’ preferences for online bus-hailing service across various travel distances in Chinese metropolitan areas. By collecting personal attributes, travel characteristics, and scenario variables (including fares, walking distance, waiting time, and travel time for various ground transportation services), we develop a travel mode choice model based on XGBoost and examine the positive and negative effects and elasticity of different influencing factors. Empirical results demonstrate that the XGBoost-based travel mode choice model performs best in predictive accuracy, proving its superior fitting capability. Meanwhile, travel distance is pivotal in determining travelers’ preferences. Short-distance travelers prioritize time efficiency, whereas as travel distance increases, travelers become less sensitive to time, and fares become the primary consideration. This shift provides service operators with opportunities to implement differentiated strategies. The remaining travel modes also significantly influence choice preferences, with travelers critically concerned about the time cost of regular bus service and highly sensitive to taxi/car-hailing service fares. Personal attributes and travel characteristics, such as gender, age, and the number of companions, also impact choice preferences, providing opportunities for service operators to offer personalized services. Elasticity analysis further confirms the role of each influencing factor in increasing the attractiveness of choosing online bus-hailing service. Ultimately, we derive significant insights at the planning level, including single-factor optimization and prioritizing optimization for different dual-factor combinations. These insights serve as a basis for urban managers to formulate and enhance online bus-hailing service, covering aspects such as fare incentive policies and route service frequencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同旅行距离的旅客对在线巴士叫车服务的偏好:中国大都市地区的启示
本研究开展了一项陈述偏好调查,以评估中国大都市地区不同出行距离的旅行者对在线巴士叫车服务的偏好。通过收集个人属性、旅行特征和场景变量(包括各种地面交通服务的票价、步行距离、等候时间和旅行时间),我们建立了基于 XGBoost 的旅行模式选择模型,并检验了不同影响因素的正负效应和弹性。实证结果表明,基于 XGBoost 的出行方式选择模型在预测准确性方面表现最佳,证明了其卓越的拟合能力。同时,旅行距离是决定旅行者偏好的关键因素。短途旅客优先考虑时间效率,而随着旅行距离的增加,旅客对时间的敏感度降低,票价成为首要考虑因素。这种转变为服务运营商提供了实施差异化战略的机会。其余出行方式也会对选择偏好产生重大影响,旅客对常规公交服务的时间成本极为关注,而对出租车/叫车服务的票价则高度敏感。个人属性和旅行特征,如性别、年龄和同行者数量,也会影响选择偏好,这为服务运营商提供了提供个性化服务的机会。弹性分析进一步证实了各影响因素在增加选择在线巴士--打车服务吸引力方面的作用。最终,我们在规划层面获得了重要启示,包括单因素优化和不同双因素组合的优先级优化。这些见解可作为城市管理者制定和改进在线巴士叫车服务的依据,涉及票价激励政策和线路服务频率等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Resilience evaluation and improvement of post-disaster multimodal transportation networks Nonlinear influences of landscape configurations and walking access to transit services on travel satisfaction Transport disadvantage and social inclusion: Exploring the role of smartphone use for transport purposes Does the shipping alliance aggravate or alleviate container shipping market volatility Classifying 15-minute Cities: A review of worldwide practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1