Assessing consumer perception on underwear products: Visual and tactile evaluations

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Sensory Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1111/joss.12937
Wei Yin, Bugao Xu, Xiaohong Yuan
{"title":"Assessing consumer perception on underwear products: Visual and tactile evaluations","authors":"Wei Yin,&nbsp;Bugao Xu,&nbsp;Xiaohong Yuan","doi":"10.1111/joss.12937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Underwear is an intimate apparel with skin contact that impacts wearer's sensory experience. The visual and tactile properties of an underwear play critical roles in consumers' comfort and style considerations. This study concentrated on analyzing consumer perceptual preferences for underwear through surveys of bipolar word-pairs describing the visual and tactile properties of underwear. A questionnaire on the word pairs was designed using semantic differential scales, and 60 selected participants were surveyed under five test modes, including visual observations and tactile explorations (such as touching, pressing, and grasping). Clustering analysis was utilized to categorize the word-pairs into four clusters—“appearance,” “hand,” “style,” and “quality”—representing vital aspects of consumer concerns about underwear. The significance of the clusters and the test modes in assessing perceived underwear values was scrutinized, and the models to predict underwear's perceived values were established through multivariate regression analysis. It was found that consumers are likely to prioritize the “appearance” and “style” clusters over the “hand” and “quality” clusters, and the visual and grasping tests over the other tactile tests. The predictive models demonstrate high reliability in estimating the perceived values of underwear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>The study findings highlight that, in assessing underwear products, consumers give greater importance to “appearance” and “style” than to “hand” and “quality.” In addition, the visual and grasping tests prove more effective than the other three methods (i.e., palm touching, fingertip touching, and fingertip pressing). These insights are valuable for underwear designers aiming to create marketable products. Moreover, the predictive models developed in the study exhibit high reliability, offering a valuable guide for consumer purchasing decisions. This is particularly pertinent in online shopping scenarios where the physical sensing of visual and tactile features of underwear is not possible.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underwear is an intimate apparel with skin contact that impacts wearer's sensory experience. The visual and tactile properties of an underwear play critical roles in consumers' comfort and style considerations. This study concentrated on analyzing consumer perceptual preferences for underwear through surveys of bipolar word-pairs describing the visual and tactile properties of underwear. A questionnaire on the word pairs was designed using semantic differential scales, and 60 selected participants were surveyed under five test modes, including visual observations and tactile explorations (such as touching, pressing, and grasping). Clustering analysis was utilized to categorize the word-pairs into four clusters—“appearance,” “hand,” “style,” and “quality”—representing vital aspects of consumer concerns about underwear. The significance of the clusters and the test modes in assessing perceived underwear values was scrutinized, and the models to predict underwear's perceived values were established through multivariate regression analysis. It was found that consumers are likely to prioritize the “appearance” and “style” clusters over the “hand” and “quality” clusters, and the visual and grasping tests over the other tactile tests. The predictive models demonstrate high reliability in estimating the perceived values of underwear.

Practical Applications

The study findings highlight that, in assessing underwear products, consumers give greater importance to “appearance” and “style” than to “hand” and “quality.” In addition, the visual and grasping tests prove more effective than the other three methods (i.e., palm touching, fingertip touching, and fingertip pressing). These insights are valuable for underwear designers aiming to create marketable products. Moreover, the predictive models developed in the study exhibit high reliability, offering a valuable guide for consumer purchasing decisions. This is particularly pertinent in online shopping scenarios where the physical sensing of visual and tactile features of underwear is not possible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估消费者对内衣产品的看法:视觉和触觉评估
内衣是一种与皮肤接触的贴身衣物,会影响穿着者的感官体验。内衣的视觉和触觉特性对消费者的舒适度和风格考量起着至关重要的作用。本研究主要通过对描述内衣视觉和触觉特性的两极词对进行调查,分析消费者对内衣的感知偏好。研究采用语义差异量表设计了有关词对的调查问卷,并在视觉观察和触觉探索(如触摸、按压和抓握)等五种测试模式下对 60 名选定参与者进行了调查。聚类分析将词对分为四个聚类--"外观"、"手感"、"款式 "和 "质量"--代表了消费者对内衣关注的重要方面。研究仔细研究了这些群组和测试模式在评估内衣感知价值方面的意义,并通过多元回归分析建立了预测内衣感知价值的模型。研究发现,消费者可能优先考虑 "外观 "和 "款式",而不是 "手感 "和 "质量",视觉和抓握测试也可能优先于其他触觉测试。预测模型在估算内衣的感知价值方面表现出很高的可靠性。 实际应用 研究结果表明,在评估内衣产品时,消费者对 "外观 "和 "款式 "的重视程度高于 "手感 "和 "质量"。此外,事实证明视觉和抓握测试比其他三种方法(即手掌触摸、指尖触摸和指尖按压)更有效。这些见解对于旨在创造适销对路产品的内衣设计师来说非常有价值。此外,研究中开发的预测模型具有很高的可靠性,可为消费者的购买决策提供有价值的指导。这一点在网购场景中尤为重要,因为在网购场景中不可能对内衣的视觉和触觉特征进行物理感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations” Rabitti, N. S., Appiani, M., Proserpio, C., Pagliarini, E., & Laureati, M. (2024). How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 39(3), e12915. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12915 Displaying ingredients on healthy snack packaging: A study on visual attention, choice, and purchase intention Normative cortical activation patterns in children distinguishing one or two tactile sensory inputs points: An functional MRI study Pleasantness of fat flavor is decreased in young adults with high perceived stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1