Comparative osseointegration of hydrophobic tissue-level tapered implants—A preclinical in vivo study

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1111/clr.14318
Jean-Claude Imber, Azita Khandanpour, Andrea Roccuzzo, Delia R. Irani, Dieter D. Bosshardt, Anton Sculean, Benjamin E. Pippenger
{"title":"Comparative osseointegration of hydrophobic tissue-level tapered implants—A preclinical in vivo study","authors":"Jean-Claude Imber,&nbsp;Azita Khandanpour,&nbsp;Andrea Roccuzzo,&nbsp;Delia R. Irani,&nbsp;Dieter D. Bosshardt,&nbsp;Anton Sculean,&nbsp;Benjamin E. Pippenger","doi":"10.1111/clr.14318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To histometrically compare the osseointegration and crestal bone healing of a novel tapered, self-cutting tissue-level test implant with a standard tissue-level control implant in a submerged healing regimen.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a mandibular minipig model, implants were inserted and evaluated histometrically after a healing period of 3, 6, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the evaluation of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and secondary outcomes were primary stability as per insertion torque and first BIC (fBIC). Outcomes for the test and control implants were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and mixed linear regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Insertion torque values were significantly higher for the test (50.0 ± 26.4 Ncm) compared to the control implants (35.2 ± 19.7 Ncm, <i>p</i> = .0071). BIC values of test implants were non-inferior to those of control implants over the investigated study period. After 12 weeks, the corresponding values measured were 81.62 ± 11.12% and 90.41 ± 4.81% (<i>p</i> = .1763) for test and control implants, respectively. Similarly, no statistical difference was found for fBIC values, except for the 12 weeks outcome that showed statistically lower values for the test (−675.58 ± 590.88 μm) compared to control implants (−182.75 ± 197.40 μm, <i>p =</i> .0068).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Novel self-cutting tissue-level implants demonstrated noninferior osseointegration and crestal bone height maintenance to the tissue-level implants. Histometric outcomes between both implants demonstrated test implants were statistically noninferior to control implants, despite substantial differences in the bone engagement mechanism and resulting differences in insertion torque and qualitative bone healing patterns.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"35 10","pages":"1299-1309"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.14318","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.14318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To histometrically compare the osseointegration and crestal bone healing of a novel tapered, self-cutting tissue-level test implant with a standard tissue-level control implant in a submerged healing regimen.

Materials and Methods

In a mandibular minipig model, implants were inserted and evaluated histometrically after a healing period of 3, 6, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the evaluation of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and secondary outcomes were primary stability as per insertion torque and first BIC (fBIC). Outcomes for the test and control implants were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and mixed linear regression models.

Results

Insertion torque values were significantly higher for the test (50.0 ± 26.4 Ncm) compared to the control implants (35.2 ± 19.7 Ncm, p = .0071). BIC values of test implants were non-inferior to those of control implants over the investigated study period. After 12 weeks, the corresponding values measured were 81.62 ± 11.12% and 90.41 ± 4.81% (p = .1763) for test and control implants, respectively. Similarly, no statistical difference was found for fBIC values, except for the 12 weeks outcome that showed statistically lower values for the test (−675.58 ± 590.88 μm) compared to control implants (−182.75 ± 197.40 μm, p = .0068).

Conclusions

Novel self-cutting tissue-level implants demonstrated noninferior osseointegration and crestal bone height maintenance to the tissue-level implants. Histometric outcomes between both implants demonstrated test implants were statistically noninferior to control implants, despite substantial differences in the bone engagement mechanism and resulting differences in insertion torque and qualitative bone healing patterns.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疏水性组织级锥形植入物的骨结合对比--临床前体内研究
目的比较新型锥形自切组织水平试验种植体与标准组织水平对照种植体在水下愈合过程中的骨结合和骨嵴愈合情况。主要结果是骨与种植体接触(BIC)的评估,次要结果是根据插入扭矩和首次骨与种植体接触(fBIC)计算的主要稳定性。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和混合线性回归模型对试验种植体和对照种植体的结果进行比较。结果试验种植体的插入扭矩值(50.0 ± 26.4 Ncm)明显高于对照种植体(35.2 ± 19.7 Ncm,p = .0071)。在研究期间,试验种植体的 BIC 值与对照种植体相比没有劣势。12 周后,测试种植体和对照种植体的相应测量值分别为 81.62 ± 11.12% 和 90.41 ± 4.81%(p = .1763)。同样,fBIC 值也没有发现统计学差异,只是在 12 周后,测试值(-675.58 ± 590.88 μm)低于对照种植体(-182.75 ± 197.40 μm,p = .0068)。两种种植体之间的组织计量结果表明,尽管骨啮合机制存在很大差异,导致插入扭矩和骨愈合模式的不同,但从统计学角度来看,试验种植体并不逊色于对照种植体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information Combined Effect of Abutment Height and Restoration Emergence Angle on Peri-Implant Bone Loss Progression: A Retrospective Analysis. In Vitro Assessment of the Potential Effect of Vertical Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Thickness on Nonsurgical and Surgical Implant Surface Decontamination Methods. Effect of Bone Microstructure Derived From CBCT on the Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1