Timothy M. Janetos, Kunal Kanwar, Saffiya Bashey, Anjum Koreishi, Debra A. Goldstein
{"title":"Predictors of Therapy Success in Weekly Adalimumab for Refractory Uveitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Timothy M. Janetos, Kunal Kanwar, Saffiya Bashey, Anjum Koreishi, Debra A. Goldstein","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine predictors of treatment success after dose escalation of adalimumab, including the measurement of anti-adalimumab antibodies as a predictor of success.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective clinical cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><em>Setting</em>: Single-center academic institution. <em>Study population</em>: Patients with noninfectious uveitis who were inadequately controlled or developed recurrent disease on every other week adalimumab and required dose escalation or therapy modification. <em>Observation procedures</em>: Patients who had anti-adalimumab antibodies checked with resultant low to intermediate levels were compared with patients who had no testing performed before adalimumab dose escalation. Of note, patients with testing and resultant high levels of anti-adalimumab antibodies were not escalated. Predictors of escalation success and utility of antibody testing before escalation were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. <em>Main outcome measures</em>: Treatment success defined as anterior chamber grade ≤0.5+ cell, topical corticosteroids ≤1 drop/d, oral prednisone ≤5 mg/d, resolution of macular edema, and resolution of angiographic signs of inflammation without any addition or escalation of therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 patients had antibodies tested with low to intermediate levels (average: 32.3 ng/mL, range: 0-154 ng/mL), whereas 41 did not have antibody testing. A greater treatment success rate after escalation was observed among the “low antibody” group compared with the “no testing” group (hazard ratio: 2.63, standard error: 1.19, <em>P</em> = .031, 95% CI: 1.09-6.37). Among the entire cohort, patients with panuveitis (<em>n</em> = 14) had a lower treatment success rate compared with the reference of anterior uveitis (<em>n</em> = 26) (hazard ratio: 0.09, standard error: 0.11, <em>P</em> = .05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with low anti-adalimumab antibodies had a greater treatment success than patients in whom antibodies were not checked. This suggests a utility to checking antibodies before dose escalation and that low levels of antibodies may confer a success advantage. Overall, patients with panuveitis had a lower rate of success after escalation while patients with anterior uveitis patients had a very high rate of success suggesting that certain disease characteristics may guide clinicians when determining who to escalate versus changing therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000293942400312X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To determine predictors of treatment success after dose escalation of adalimumab, including the measurement of anti-adalimumab antibodies as a predictor of success.
Design
Retrospective clinical cohort study.
Methods
Setting: Single-center academic institution. Study population: Patients with noninfectious uveitis who were inadequately controlled or developed recurrent disease on every other week adalimumab and required dose escalation or therapy modification. Observation procedures: Patients who had anti-adalimumab antibodies checked with resultant low to intermediate levels were compared with patients who had no testing performed before adalimumab dose escalation. Of note, patients with testing and resultant high levels of anti-adalimumab antibodies were not escalated. Predictors of escalation success and utility of antibody testing before escalation were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Main outcome measures: Treatment success defined as anterior chamber grade ≤0.5+ cell, topical corticosteroids ≤1 drop/d, oral prednisone ≤5 mg/d, resolution of macular edema, and resolution of angiographic signs of inflammation without any addition or escalation of therapy.
Results
A total of 24 patients had antibodies tested with low to intermediate levels (average: 32.3 ng/mL, range: 0-154 ng/mL), whereas 41 did not have antibody testing. A greater treatment success rate after escalation was observed among the “low antibody” group compared with the “no testing” group (hazard ratio: 2.63, standard error: 1.19, P = .031, 95% CI: 1.09-6.37). Among the entire cohort, patients with panuveitis (n = 14) had a lower treatment success rate compared with the reference of anterior uveitis (n = 26) (hazard ratio: 0.09, standard error: 0.11, P = .05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.99).
Conclusions
Patients with low anti-adalimumab antibodies had a greater treatment success than patients in whom antibodies were not checked. This suggests a utility to checking antibodies before dose escalation and that low levels of antibodies may confer a success advantage. Overall, patients with panuveitis had a lower rate of success after escalation while patients with anterior uveitis patients had a very high rate of success suggesting that certain disease characteristics may guide clinicians when determining who to escalate versus changing therapy.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.