Comprehensive evaluation of urban river ecological bank protection based on AHP-TOPSIS method.

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1080/09593330.2024.2380395
Shutian Li, Liu Yang, Jianyin Fang
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of urban river ecological bank protection based on AHP-TOPSIS method.","authors":"Shutian Li, Liu Yang, Jianyin Fang","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2024.2380395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ecological revetment is a new type that combines natural vegetation with civil engineering technology to establish functions, such as flood control, drainage, ecology, and landscape. Various types of ecological and other bank protection lead to different bank protection effects. Urban river ecological bank protection can effectively prevent bank collapse and promote mutual infiltration between river water and soil and is important for maintaining the balance of the river ecosystem and enhancing the ecological service function of river bank protection. To scientifically and accurately evaluate the ecological protection of riverbanks, this study screened 16 evaluation indicators based on four aspects: structural stability, ecological functionality, landscape suitability, and socio-economic status. A comprehensive evaluation index system for urban river ecological protection was constructed and an urban river ecological protection evaluation model based on the AHP - TOPSIS method was established. The model was used to evaluate the ecological protection of the rivers in the study area. The results revealed that the evaluation value, 0.830, of the self-embedded retaining wall exhibited the best performance among the current slope protection types. In addition, structural stability is a crucial factor in river ecological revetments, and the evaluation results were consistent with the revetment type selected in actual engineering. Therefore, the evaluation system constructed in this study is reasonable and reliable and has strong generalizability. This study provides theoretical guidance for selecting ecological protection banks for future river management projects and has specific references important for academic research and the development of environmental protection banks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1201-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2024.2380395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ecological revetment is a new type that combines natural vegetation with civil engineering technology to establish functions, such as flood control, drainage, ecology, and landscape. Various types of ecological and other bank protection lead to different bank protection effects. Urban river ecological bank protection can effectively prevent bank collapse and promote mutual infiltration between river water and soil and is important for maintaining the balance of the river ecosystem and enhancing the ecological service function of river bank protection. To scientifically and accurately evaluate the ecological protection of riverbanks, this study screened 16 evaluation indicators based on four aspects: structural stability, ecological functionality, landscape suitability, and socio-economic status. A comprehensive evaluation index system for urban river ecological protection was constructed and an urban river ecological protection evaluation model based on the AHP - TOPSIS method was established. The model was used to evaluate the ecological protection of the rivers in the study area. The results revealed that the evaluation value, 0.830, of the self-embedded retaining wall exhibited the best performance among the current slope protection types. In addition, structural stability is a crucial factor in river ecological revetments, and the evaluation results were consistent with the revetment type selected in actual engineering. Therefore, the evaluation system constructed in this study is reasonable and reliable and has strong generalizability. This study provides theoretical guidance for selecting ecological protection banks for future river management projects and has specific references important for academic research and the development of environmental protection banks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于AHP-TOPSIS方法的城市河流生态护岸综合评价。
生态护岸是将自然植被与土木工程技术相结合,建立防洪、排水、生态、景观等功能的一种新型护岸。各种类型的生态护岸和其他护岸会产生不同的护岸效果。城市河道生态护岸能有效防止崩岸,促进河水与土壤的相互渗透,对维持河道生态系统平衡、增强河道护岸的生态服务功能具有重要意义。为科学、准确地评价河岸生态保护状况,本研究从结构稳定性、生态功能性、景观适宜性和社会经济状况四个方面筛选了 16 项评价指标。构建了城市河流生态保护综合评价指标体系,建立了基于 AHP - TOPSIS 法的城市河流生态保护评价模型。利用该模型对研究区域内的河流进行生态保护评价。结果显示,自嵌式挡土墙的评价值为 0.830,在目前的护坡类型中表现最佳。此外,结构稳定性是河流生态护岸的关键因素,评价结果与实际工程中选择的护岸类型一致。因此,本研究构建的评价体系合理可靠,具有较强的普适性。本研究为今后河道治理工程中生态护岸的选择提供了理论指导,对学术研究和环保护岸的发展具有重要的借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology
Environmental Technology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies. Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months. Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current
期刊最新文献
Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants based on non-dispersive infrared technique: a case study. Quantification of microplastics in Coptodon rendalli and surface waters of Dikgatlhong Dam, Botswana: the first baseline evidence. Synergistic anaerobic caffeine degradation and bioelectricity production using microbial fuel cell. Accounting carbon emission responsibility on China's ICT sector under different principles based on the EE-MRIO model. Chlorine regeneration of a zeolite ion-exchange column for ammonia removal from an explosives-impacted mining wastewater.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1