Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1111/medu.15476
Hiske Joanna Brouwer, Margot Barry, Manon Kluijtmans, Roger Anna Maria Joseph Damoiseaux, Esther de Groot
{"title":"Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review.","authors":"Hiske Joanna Brouwer, Margot Barry, Manon Kluijtmans, Roger Anna Maria Joseph Damoiseaux, Esther de Groot","doi":"10.1111/medu.15476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinician-teachers, physicians with educational responsibilities in either classroom or clinical setting, are assumed to add value by virtue of their dual role. The clinical responsibilities are often prioritised over the educational tasks. How and under which circumstances clinician-teachers are able to perform their educational role and create added value for different stakeholders is currently unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify for whom, how and under which circumstances educational activities executed by CTs by virtue of their dual role add value to others.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>CTs activities linking the system of education and clinical practice beyond direct patient interactions and purposefully executed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A realist review was conducted. Databases were searched in two stages: a narrow conventional search, followed by a comprehensive artificial intelligence-aided search. Studies concerning clinician-teachers' dual role were included. Realist analysis was applied to identify in which contexts resource mechanisms triggered reasoning mechanisms, which led to specific outcomes for different stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six studies were included. In contexts where clinician-teachers' dual role was formally recognised and valued, clinician-teachers benefitted from the credibility and legitimacy bestowed on them, making the transfer of domain-specific knowledge more impactful. In contexts where sociocultural differences between both systems existed, CTs were able to mediate and adjust recommendations aligned with stakeholders' perceived relevance. Also, contexts organised to support both roles made resource mechanisms more impactful. Clinician-teachers added value to students' clinical competency and learning environment, and to educational organisations' curricular innovation. In their clinical workspace, clinician-teachers added value by enhancing colleague physicians' teaching expertise, implementing educational innovations and recruiting students for scarce specialisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinician-teachers add value to students, colleague physicians and the clinical and educational contexts at large. Domain-specific knowledge of both systems was important to gain credibility and achieve added value. Openness, formal recognition and allocated time for both roles in educational and clinical contexts towards the dual role are important to strengthen the impact of the dual role.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinician-teachers, physicians with educational responsibilities in either classroom or clinical setting, are assumed to add value by virtue of their dual role. The clinical responsibilities are often prioritised over the educational tasks. How and under which circumstances clinician-teachers are able to perform their educational role and create added value for different stakeholders is currently unclear.

Objectives: To identify for whom, how and under which circumstances educational activities executed by CTs by virtue of their dual role add value to others.

Scope: CTs activities linking the system of education and clinical practice beyond direct patient interactions and purposefully executed.

Methods: A realist review was conducted. Databases were searched in two stages: a narrow conventional search, followed by a comprehensive artificial intelligence-aided search. Studies concerning clinician-teachers' dual role were included. Realist analysis was applied to identify in which contexts resource mechanisms triggered reasoning mechanisms, which led to specific outcomes for different stakeholders.

Results: Sixty-six studies were included. In contexts where clinician-teachers' dual role was formally recognised and valued, clinician-teachers benefitted from the credibility and legitimacy bestowed on them, making the transfer of domain-specific knowledge more impactful. In contexts where sociocultural differences between both systems existed, CTs were able to mediate and adjust recommendations aligned with stakeholders' perceived relevance. Also, contexts organised to support both roles made resource mechanisms more impactful. Clinician-teachers added value to students' clinical competency and learning environment, and to educational organisations' curricular innovation. In their clinical workspace, clinician-teachers added value by enhancing colleague physicians' teaching expertise, implementing educational innovations and recruiting students for scarce specialisms.

Conclusion: Clinician-teachers add value to students, colleague physicians and the clinical and educational contexts at large. Domain-specific knowledge of both systems was important to gain credibility and achieve added value. Openness, formal recognition and allocated time for both roles in educational and clinical contexts towards the dual role are important to strengthen the impact of the dual role.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养作为教师的临床医生:现实主义评论。
背景:临床教师,即在课堂或临床环境中承担教育职责的医生,被认为因其双重角色而具有增值作用。临床职责往往优先于教育任务。目前尚不清楚临床教师如何以及在何种情况下能够履行其教育职责并为不同利益相关者创造附加值:目的:确定临床教师凭借其双重身份为谁开展教育活动、如何开展教育活动以及在何种情况下开展教育活动,从而为他人创造价值:范围: CTs 在与患者直接互动之外,有目的地开展的连接教育系统和临床实践的活动:方法:进行现实主义审查。数据库的检索分为两个阶段:狭义的常规检索和全面的人工智能辅助检索。其中包括有关临床医生-教师双重角色的研究。应用现实主义分析法确定在哪些情况下资源机制触发了推理机制,从而导致不同利益相关者的特定结果:结果:共纳入 66 项研究。在临床医生-教师的双重角色得到正式认可和重视的情况下,临床医生-教师从赋予他们的可信度和合法性中获益,从而使特定领域知识的传授更具影响力。在两个系统之间存在社会文化差异的情况下,临床教师能够根据利益相关者的相关性对建议进行调解和调整。此外,为支持两种角色而组织的环境也使资源机制更具影响力。临床教师为学生的临床能力和学习环境以及教育机构的课程创新增添了价值。在临床工作场所,临床教师通过提高同事医生的教学专业知识、实施教育创新和招收稀缺专业的学生来增加价值:结论:临床教师为学生、同事医生以及整个临床和教育环境带来了价值。两个系统的特定领域知识对于获得可信度和实现附加值非常重要。教育和临床环境对双重角色的开放、正式认可和分配时间,对加强双重角色的影响非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
A realist evaluation of prospective entrustment decisions in paediatric residency clinical competency committees. Putting 'leader' back into leadership training. Supporting resident inbox management with screen-casted videos. Enhancing telehealth Objective Structured Clinical Examination fidelity with integrated Electronic Health Record simulation. Equity, diversity, and inclusion in entrustable professional activities based assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1