Effects of Different Exercise Interventions on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w
Mansueto Gomes-Neto, Andre Rodrigues Durães, Lino Sérgio Rocha Conceição, Michelli Bernardone Saquetto, Iura Gonzalez Alves, Neil A Smart, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho
{"title":"Effects of Different Exercise Interventions on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Mansueto Gomes-Neto, Andre Rodrigues Durães, Lino Sérgio Rocha Conceição, Michelli Bernardone Saquetto, Iura Gonzalez Alves, Neil A Smart, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is an important component of rehabilitation care for people with coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to critically analyze and summarize the existing evidence from published systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and PEDro) were searched for SRs of exercise interventions of people with CHD. Two reviewers assessed the quality of SRs using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated the strength of evidence quality with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for relevant outcome measures. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one SRs (with 125 RCTs) met the study criteria, including 33,608 patients. Compared with usual care, continuous aerobic exercise produced an improvement in peak oxygen consumption, MD of 3.8 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 3.204.4, I<sup>2</sup> = 67%); high-intensity interval training, MD 6.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 0.4-11.8, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%); resistance training, MD of 2.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 0.98-3.2, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%); combined aerobic and resistance training, MD of 3.0 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 2.5-3.4, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%); and water-based exercise, MD of 4.4 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI, 2.1-6.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions improve peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD. However, there was moderate to very-low certainty for the evidence found.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2395-2409"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise is an important component of rehabilitation care for people with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to critically analyze and summarize the existing evidence from published systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD.

Methods: Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and PEDro) were searched for SRs of exercise interventions of people with CHD. Two reviewers assessed the quality of SRs using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated the strength of evidence quality with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for relevant outcome measures. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Thirty-one SRs (with 125 RCTs) met the study criteria, including 33,608 patients. Compared with usual care, continuous aerobic exercise produced an improvement in peak oxygen consumption, MD of 3.8 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 3.204.4, I2 = 67%); high-intensity interval training, MD 6.1 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 0.4-11.8, I2 = 97%); resistance training, MD of 2.1 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 0.98-3.2, I2 = 60%); combined aerobic and resistance training, MD of 3.0 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 2.5-3.4, I2 = 0%); and water-based exercise, MD of 4.4 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI, 2.1-6.7; I2 = 2%).

Conclusion: Exercise interventions improve peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD. However, there was moderate to very-low certainty for the evidence found.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同运动干预对冠心病患者以峰值耗氧量衡量的心肺功能的影响:系统综述》。
背景:运动是冠心病患者康复护理的重要组成部分:运动是冠心病患者康复治疗的重要组成部分:本研究旨在批判性地分析和总结已发表的系统综述(SR)和随机对照试验(RCT)荟萃分析中的现有证据,这些证据评估了不同类型的运动干预对冠心病患者心肺功能的影响,以峰值耗氧量来衡量:方法:在电子数据库(Cochrane Library、Medline/PubMed、EMBASE 和 PEDro)中搜索有关冠心病患者运动干预的研究报告。两名审稿人使用AMSTAR-2工具评估了SRs的质量,并使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统对相关结果指标的证据质量强度进行了评估。计算了平均差(MD)和 95% 置信区间(CI):符合研究标准的研究有 31 项(其中有 125 项 RCT),包括 33,608 名患者。与常规护理相比,持续有氧运动可改善峰值耗氧量,MD 为 3.8 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI:3.204.4,I2 = 67%);高强度间歇训练,MD 为 6.1 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI:0.4-11.8,I2 = 97%);阻力训练,MD 为 2.1 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 0.98-3.2, I2 = 60%);结合有氧和阻力训练,MD 为 3.0 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 2.5-3.4, I2 = 0%);水上运动,MD 为 4.4 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI, 2.1-6.7; I2 = 2%):结论:运动干预可改善冠心病患者的峰值耗氧量。结论:运动干预可改善冠心病患者的峰值耗氧量,但所发现的证据的确定性为中度到极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between Physical Literacy and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Guiding Evidence-Based Classification in Para Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review of Impairment Measures and Activity Limitations The Influence of Kinesiophobia on Time to Clinical Recovery in Collegiate Athletes with Concussion Acknowledgement to Referees and the Editorial Board. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy as a Tool to Characterize Exercise and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1