Sports Medicine最新文献

Goal setting is one of the most commonly used strategies for increasing exercise and physical activity, and is a core aspect of the scope of practice for many exercise and health practitioners. Despite its widespread use, recent research has highlighted a need to reconsider traditional practice and re-evaluate the theoretical and empirical basis of goal setting in exercise and physical activity promotion. The issues identified in traditional approaches to goal setting in exercise and physical activity include oversimplification, misapplication of theory and over-reliance on the SMART acronym (e.g., Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-bound goals) rather than more rigorous evidence-based approaches. Therefore, this expert statement, on behalf of Exercise and Sports Science Australia, reviews theory and empirical evidence on goal setting, and provides practical recommendations for exercise and health practitioners when supporting clients to set goals. To move beyond the issues highlighted in traditional approaches to goal setting, it is necessary to go 'back to basics' and consider the foundations of goal setting. In turn, we outline: the goal-setting process; the structure of goals; moderating factors that determine whether/when certain types of goal should be set; and outcomes of goals, including risks and pitfalls. We provide corresponding practical recommendations to assist exercise and health practitioners in setting goals with clients. This expert statement seeks to help practitioners avoid the issues highlighted in traditional approaches to goal setting in exercise and physical activity, and set more suitable and evidence-based goals with clients instead.

This is the second of two publications comprising the 2025 update to the 2014 Consensus Statement on treatment and return to play guidelines on the Female Athlete Triad (Triad). This paper pairs with the 2025 Update to the Female Athlete Triad Coalition Consensus Statement Part 1: State of the Science and Introduction of a New Adolescent Model (Sports Medicine, 2025), to focus on evidence-based revisions for screening, diagnosis, treatment, and clearance and return to play. Revised recommendations for managing eating disorders (ED)/disordered eating (DE) and non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment of bone loss and abnormal menstrual cycles are included, as are the most recent clearance and return to play recommendations, inclusive of adolescent athletes. Recent research supports the adoption of revised criteria for defining and treating energy deficiency, moving away from the concept of an energy-availability threshold. Energy deficiency-induced menstrual disturbances can be reversed with a moderate increase in food intake and modest weight gain, but restoration of menses alone is not associated with high rates of ovulation or increased ovarian steroid levels until multiple consecutive normal length menstrual cycles are achieved. Revised guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of functional hypothalamic oligo/amenorrhea are included with guidance on the confounding effects of hyperandrogenemia. Gynecological age and psychological stress are factors impacting the individual susceptibility to the Triad. The bone health spectrum of the Triad now includes bone stress injuries. Routes of administration via epidermal patch versus oral for pharmacological treatment of low bone density are discussed. The diagnosis, treatment, and return to play approaches for adolescents with the Triad are unique compared with those employed for adults and require age-appropriate clinical guidelines. The strength of the evidence-based statements is graded using an accepted taxonomy in which randomized controlled trials and observational data are considered the highest level of evidence.

This paper is the first of two publications comprising a 2025 update to the 2014 Consensus Statement on treatment and return-to-play guidelines on the Female Athlete Triad (Triad), defined as three inter-related components including energy status, reproductive function, and bone health. The Triad is initiated by exposure to varying degrees of energy deficiency with or without disordered eating/eating disorders with primary pathological outcomes to the reproductive and skeletal systems. This first paper includes a detailed update on the scientific underpinnings of the Triad and introduces a new Triad model specific to the adolescent female athlete. Energy deficiency and "metabolic compensation" are added to the energy status continuum to describe adaptations that reflect energy conservation. Ovarian steroid hormone exposure and functional hypothalamic oligo-amenorrhea are added to the reproductive function continuum. Bone stress injury is added to the bone health continuum. Rates of change are depicted for the induction and recovery of clinical outcomes within the adult model. Evidence-based statements are presented throughout the paper and supported by a high number of level A and B grades.