Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Coronary Artery Disease Detection and Classification Using a Heterogeneous Multivendor Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Data Set.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000798
Emanuele Muscogiuri, Marly van Assen, Giovanni Tessarin, Alexander C Razavi, Max Schoebinger, Michael Wels, Mehmet Akif Gulsun, Puneet Sharma, George S K Fung, Carlo N De Cecco
{"title":"Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Coronary Artery Disease Detection and Classification Using a Heterogeneous Multivendor Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Data Set.","authors":"Emanuele Muscogiuri, Marly van Assen, Giovanni Tessarin, Alexander C Razavi, Max Schoebinger, Michael Wels, Mehmet Akif Gulsun, Puneet Sharma, George S K Fung, Carlo N De Cecco","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to clinically validate a fully automated deep learning (DL) algorithm for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection and classification in a heterogeneous multivendor cardiac computed tomography angiography data set.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-centre retrospective study, we included patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography angiography scans between 2010 and 2020 with scanners from 4 vendors (Siemens Healthineers, Philips, General Electrics, and Canon). Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification was performed by a DL algorithm and by an expert reader (reader 1, R1), the gold standard. Variability analysis was performed with a second reader (reader 2, R2) and the radiologic reports on a subset of cases. Statistical analysis was performed stratifying patients according to the presence of CAD (CAD-RADS >0) and obstructive CAD (CAD-RADS ≥3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred ninety-six patients (average age: 53.66 ± 13.65, 169 males) were enrolled. For the detection of CAD only, the DL algorithm showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of 95.3%, 79.7%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. For the detection of obstructive CAD, the DL algorithm showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of 89.4%, 92.8%, 92.2%, and 91.1%, respectively. The variability analysis for the detection of obstructive CAD showed an accuracy of 92.5% comparing the DL algorithm with R1, and 96.2% comparing R1 with R2 and radiology reports. The time of analysis was lower using the DL algorithm compared with R1 (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL algorithm demonstrated robust performance and excellent agreement with the expert readers' analysis for the evaluation of CAD, which also corresponded with significantly reduced image analysis time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to clinically validate a fully automated deep learning (DL) algorithm for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection and classification in a heterogeneous multivendor cardiac computed tomography angiography data set.

Materials and methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, we included patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography angiography scans between 2010 and 2020 with scanners from 4 vendors (Siemens Healthineers, Philips, General Electrics, and Canon). Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification was performed by a DL algorithm and by an expert reader (reader 1, R1), the gold standard. Variability analysis was performed with a second reader (reader 2, R2) and the radiologic reports on a subset of cases. Statistical analysis was performed stratifying patients according to the presence of CAD (CAD-RADS >0) and obstructive CAD (CAD-RADS ≥3).

Results: Two hundred ninety-six patients (average age: 53.66 ± 13.65, 169 males) were enrolled. For the detection of CAD only, the DL algorithm showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of 95.3%, 79.7%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. For the detection of obstructive CAD, the DL algorithm showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve of 89.4%, 92.8%, 92.2%, and 91.1%, respectively. The variability analysis for the detection of obstructive CAD showed an accuracy of 92.5% comparing the DL algorithm with R1, and 96.2% comparing R1 with R2 and radiology reports. The time of analysis was lower using the DL algorithm compared with R1 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The DL algorithm demonstrated robust performance and excellent agreement with the expert readers' analysis for the evaluation of CAD, which also corresponded with significantly reduced image analysis time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用异构多供应商冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影数据集对用于自动冠状动脉疾病检测和分类的深度学习算法进行临床验证。
目的:我们试图在异构的多供应商心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影数据集中,对用于冠状动脉疾病(CAD)检测和分类的全自动深度学习(DL)算法进行临床验证:在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们纳入了在 2010 年至 2020 年期间使用 4 家供应商(西门子医疗、飞利浦、通用电气和佳能)的扫描仪进行心脏计算机断层扫描的患者。冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS)分类由 DL 算法和专家读者(读者 1,R1)(金标准)进行。由第二位读者(读者 2,R2)和部分病例的放射学报告进行变异性分析。根据是否存在 CAD(CAD-RADS >0)和阻塞性 CAD(CAD-RADS ≥3)对患者进行分层统计分析:结果:共登记了 296 名患者(平均年龄:53.66 ± 13.65,男性 169 人)。仅在检测 CAD 方面,DL 算法的敏感性、特异性、准确性和曲线下面积分别为 95.3%、79.7%、87.5% 和 87.5%。对于阻塞性 CAD 的检测,DL 算法的敏感性、特异性、准确性和曲线下面积分别为 89.4%、92.8%、92.2% 和 91.1%。阻塞性 CAD 检测的变异性分析显示,将 DL 算法与 R1 相比,准确率为 92.5%,将 R1 与 R2 和放射学报告相比,准确率为 96.2%。与R1相比,DL算法的分析时间更短(P < 0.001):DL算法在评估CAD方面表现出强大的性能,与专家读者的分析结果非常吻合,同时也大大缩短了图像分析时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Resolution Fidelity Comparison Between Energy Integrating and Deep Silicon Photon Counting CT: Implications for Pulmonary Imaging. Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance. The Relationship Between Cardiac CT-based Left Atrial Structure and Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Within 2 Years. Left Atrial Strain for Prediction of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking. Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1