Support for Policies and Strategies to Promote Healthy Food Retail In-Store and Online: Perspectives From a National Sample of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participants

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.06.001
{"title":"Support for Policies and Strategies to Promote Healthy Food Retail In-Store and Online: Perspectives From a National Sample of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participants","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Gather perspectives on healthy retail policies and strategies from a national sample of <span><em>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program</em></span> (SNAP) participants.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Anonymous web-based survey fielded in English and Spanish. The survey measured support for healthy retail policies and strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>National Qualtrics panel fielded on September 30 and October 19, 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A total of 1,559 adult SNAP participants (in the last 12 months) participated in the Qualtrics SNAP survey panel.</div></div><div><h3>Variables Measured</h3><div>Overall support for retail policies and strategies was calculated using response frequencies and proportions.</div></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><div><span>Cross-tabulations and chi-square tests of independence assessed differences in policy support by online shopping behavior and nutrition security status. Significance was determined at </span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most SNAP participants were broadly supportive of policies and strategies to improve the healthy food retail environment. More restrictive policies were less popular than policies that expanded consumer choice. Support also varied by online shopping status and nutrition security status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Policies and strategies that improve the healthy food retail environment are popular among a national sample of SNAP participants. Policy discussions must understand SNAP participants’ perspectives regarding changes to the retail environment that may impact their ability to access healthy foods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624003518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Gather perspectives on healthy retail policies and strategies from a national sample of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants.

Design

Anonymous web-based survey fielded in English and Spanish. The survey measured support for healthy retail policies and strategies.

Setting

National Qualtrics panel fielded on September 30 and October 19, 2022.

Participants

A total of 1,559 adult SNAP participants (in the last 12 months) participated in the Qualtrics SNAP survey panel.

Variables Measured

Overall support for retail policies and strategies was calculated using response frequencies and proportions.

Analysis

Cross-tabulations and chi-square tests of independence assessed differences in policy support by online shopping behavior and nutrition security status. Significance was determined at P < 0.05.

Results

Most SNAP participants were broadly supportive of policies and strategies to improve the healthy food retail environment. More restrictive policies were less popular than policies that expanded consumer choice. Support also varied by online shopping status and nutrition security status.

Conclusions and Implications

Policies and strategies that improve the healthy food retail environment are popular among a national sample of SNAP participants. Policy discussions must understand SNAP participants’ perspectives regarding changes to the retail environment that may impact their ability to access healthy foods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持促进店内和网上健康食品零售的政策和策略:来自全国营养补助计划参与者样本的观点。
目标:收集全国营养补助计划(SNAP)参与者对健康零售政策和策略的看法:收集全国营养补助计划 (SNAP) 参与者对健康零售政策和策略的看法:设计:匿名网络调查,使用英语和西班牙语。调查衡量了对健康零售政策和策略的支持程度:全国 Qualtrics 小组于 2022 年 9 月 30 日和 10 月 19 日进行调查:共有 1,559 名成年 SNAP 参与者(过去 12 个月内)参加了 Qualtrics SNAP 调查小组:分析:交叉分析和卡方检验:交叉表和独立卡方检验评估了网购行为和营养安全状况对政策支持的影响。结果:大多数 SNAP 参与者都广泛支持营养安全政策:大多数 SNAP 参与者广泛支持改善健康食品零售环境的政策和策略。限制性较强的政策不如扩大消费者选择的政策受欢迎。支持率也因网购状况和营养安全状况而异:改善健康食品零售环境的政策和策略在全国 SNAP 参与者中很受欢迎。政策讨论必须了解 SNAP 参与者对零售环境变化的看法,这些变化可能会影响他们获取健康食品的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of a Fresh Produce Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses. Development of Educational Whiteboard Videos for Head Start Teachers on How to Implement Food-based Learning in the Preschool Classroom. Deciphering Dichos for Nutrition and Health Discussion: A Qualitative Study Among Men of Mexican Origin With or At-Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Acceptability of Pilot School-based Food Pantries Compared With Weekend Feeding BackPack Programs Among Food Pantry Clients in Rural Tennessee: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1