Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder With and Without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Olivia G. Calancie , Ashley C. Parr , Don C. Brien , Brian C. Coe , Linda Booij , Sarosh Khalid-Khan , Doug P. Munoz
{"title":"Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder With and Without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder","authors":"Olivia G. Calancie , Ashley C. Parr , Don C. Brien , Brian C. Coe , Linda Booij , Sarosh Khalid-Khan , Doug P. Munoz","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with heightened impulsivity, evidenced by increased substance abuse, self-harm, and suicide attempts. Addressing impulsivity in individuals with BPD is a therapeutic objective, but its underlying neural basis in this clinical population remains unclear, partly due to its frequent comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a response inhibition paradigm—the interleaved pro-/antisaccade task—among adolescents diagnosed with BPD with and without comorbid ADHD (<em>n</em> = 25 and <em>n</em> = 24, respectively) during concomitant video-based eye tracking. We quantified various eye movement response parameters reflective of impulsive action during the task, including delay to fixation acquisition, fixation breaks, anticipatory saccades, and direction errors with express saccade (saccade reaction time: 90–140 ms) and regular saccade latencies (saccade reaction time > 140 ms).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals with BPD exhibited deficient response preparation, as evidenced by reduced visual fixation on task cues and greater variability of saccade responses (i.e., saccade reaction time and peak velocity). The ADHD/BPD group shared these traits and made more anticipatory responses and direction errors with express saccade latencies and reduced error correction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Saccadic deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD stemmed not from an inability to execute antisaccades but rather from inadequate preparation for the upcoming task set. These distinctions may arise due to abnormal signaling in cortical areas like the frontal eye fields, posterior parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. Understanding these mechanisms could provide insights into targeted interventions focusing on task set preparation to manage response inhibition deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"9 11","pages":"Pages 1178-1187"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with heightened impulsivity, evidenced by increased substance abuse, self-harm, and suicide attempts. Addressing impulsivity in individuals with BPD is a therapeutic objective, but its underlying neural basis in this clinical population remains unclear, partly due to its frequent comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Methods
We used a response inhibition paradigm—the interleaved pro-/antisaccade task—among adolescents diagnosed with BPD with and without comorbid ADHD (n = 25 and n = 24, respectively) during concomitant video-based eye tracking. We quantified various eye movement response parameters reflective of impulsive action during the task, including delay to fixation acquisition, fixation breaks, anticipatory saccades, and direction errors with express saccade (saccade reaction time: 90–140 ms) and regular saccade latencies (saccade reaction time > 140 ms).
Results
Individuals with BPD exhibited deficient response preparation, as evidenced by reduced visual fixation on task cues and greater variability of saccade responses (i.e., saccade reaction time and peak velocity). The ADHD/BPD group shared these traits and made more anticipatory responses and direction errors with express saccade latencies and reduced error correction.
Conclusions
Saccadic deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD stemmed not from an inability to execute antisaccades but rather from inadequate preparation for the upcoming task set. These distinctions may arise due to abnormal signaling in cortical areas like the frontal eye fields, posterior parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. Understanding these mechanisms could provide insights into targeted interventions focusing on task set preparation to manage response inhibition deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.