Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder with and without co-morbid Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder.

Olivia G Calancie, Ashley C Parr, Don C Brien, Brian C Coe, Linda Booij, Sarosh Khalid-Khan, Doug P Munoz
{"title":"Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder with and without co-morbid Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Olivia G Calancie, Ashley C Parr, Don C Brien, Brian C Coe, Linda Booij, Sarosh Khalid-Khan, Doug P Munoz","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is associated with heightened impulsivity, evidenced by increased substance abuse, self-harm and suicide attempts. Addressing impulsivity in individuals with BPD is a therapeutic objective; but its underlying neural basis in this clinical population remains unclear, partly due to its frequent co-morbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a response inhibition paradigm - the interleaved pro-/anti-saccade task (IPAST) - among adolescents diagnosed with BPD with and without comorbid ADHD (N=25 and N=24, respectively) during concomitant video-based eye-tracking. We quantified various eye movement response parameters reflective of impulsive action during the task, including delay to fixation acquisition, fixation breaks, anticipatory saccades, and direction errors with express saccade (Saccade Reaction Time [SRT]: 90-140 ms) and regular saccade latencies (SRT > 140 ms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with BPD exhibited deficient response preparation, exampled by reduced visual fixation on task cues and greater variability of saccade responses (i.e., SRT and peak velocity). The ADHD/BPD group shared these traits, as well as produced an increased frequency of anticipatory responses and direction errors with express saccade latencies and reduced error correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Saccadic deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD stem not from an inability to execute anti-saccades, but rather from an inadequate preparation for the upcoming task set. These distinctions may arise due to abnormal signaling in cortical areas like the frontal eye fields, posterior parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. Understanding these mechanisms could provide insights into targeted interventions focusing on task set preparation to manage response inhibition deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is associated with heightened impulsivity, evidenced by increased substance abuse, self-harm and suicide attempts. Addressing impulsivity in individuals with BPD is a therapeutic objective; but its underlying neural basis in this clinical population remains unclear, partly due to its frequent co-morbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Methods: We employed a response inhibition paradigm - the interleaved pro-/anti-saccade task (IPAST) - among adolescents diagnosed with BPD with and without comorbid ADHD (N=25 and N=24, respectively) during concomitant video-based eye-tracking. We quantified various eye movement response parameters reflective of impulsive action during the task, including delay to fixation acquisition, fixation breaks, anticipatory saccades, and direction errors with express saccade (Saccade Reaction Time [SRT]: 90-140 ms) and regular saccade latencies (SRT > 140 ms).

Results: Individuals with BPD exhibited deficient response preparation, exampled by reduced visual fixation on task cues and greater variability of saccade responses (i.e., SRT and peak velocity). The ADHD/BPD group shared these traits, as well as produced an increased frequency of anticipatory responses and direction errors with express saccade latencies and reduced error correction.

Conclusions: Saccadic deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD stem not from an inability to execute anti-saccades, but rather from an inadequate preparation for the upcoming task set. These distinctions may arise due to abnormal signaling in cortical areas like the frontal eye fields, posterior parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex. Understanding these mechanisms could provide insights into targeted interventions focusing on task set preparation to manage response inhibition deficits in BPD and ADHD/BPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴有或不伴有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的边缘型人格障碍患者的视线固定和准备性跳跃控制能力受损。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与冲动性增强有关,表现为药物滥用、自残和自杀企图增多。解决 BPD 患者的冲动问题是一项治疗目标;但在这一临床人群中,其潜在的神经基础仍不清楚,部分原因是它经常与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)共病:我们采用了一种反应抑制范式--交错前/反回旋任务(IPAST)--在同时进行视频眼动追踪的过程中,对被诊断为伴有或不伴有多动症的青少年(分别为 25 人和 24 人)进行了研究。我们对任务中反映冲动性动作的各种眼动反应参数进行了量化,包括获得定点的延迟、定点中断、预期性囊回以及快速囊回的方向错误(囊回反应时间 [SRT]:90-140 毫秒)和常规囊回延迟(SRT > 140 毫秒):结果:患有 BPD 的个体表现出反应准备不足,具体表现为对任务线索的视觉固定减少,以及囊回反应(即 SRT 和峰值速度)的变异性更大。ADHD/BPD组也具有这些特征,同时还表现出更高频率的预期反应和方向错误,囊回延迟更快,错误纠正更少:结论:BPD和ADHD/BPD的回闪缺陷并非源于无法执行反回闪,而是源于对即将到来的任务准备不足。这些区别可能是由于额叶眼区、后顶叶皮层和前扣带回皮层等皮层区域的信号异常造成的。了解这些机制可以为有针对性的干预措施提供启示,这些干预措施侧重于任务集准备,以控制BPD和ADHD/BPD的反应抑制缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Altered development of the Hurst Exponent in medial prefrontal cortex in preschoolers with autism. Symptom Dimensions and Cognitive Impairments in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Beyond the Descriptive: A Comprehensive, Multi-domain Validation of Symptom Trajectories for Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Multitrait analysis to decipher the intertwined genetic architecture of neuroanatomical phenotypes and psychiatric disorders. Multivariate Association between Functional Connectivity Gradients and Cognition in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1